Search

The aim of this study was to compare midchildhood speech outcomes in patients with nonsyndromic Robin sequence with cleft palate (RSCP) treated with mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) to patients with nonsyndromic Veau class I and Veau class II cleft palate (CP).The authors performed a retrospective review of patients with nonsyndromic Robin sequence from 2000 to 2017, comparing those who underwent MDO to patients with nonsyndromic CP. Demographics, operative details, length of hospital stay, complications, and Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scale scores were collected.Thirty-three patients met inclusion criteria in the MDO group with 127 patients as controls. Despite similar median age (RSCP, 4.5 years; CP only, 4.6 years) and Veau cleft type at early evaluation, there was a significant increase in composite Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scale score within the MDO cohort ( P ≤ 0.002); specifically, with worse visible nasal emission ( P ≤ 0.007), hypernasality ( P ≤ 0.001), and compensatory articulation ( P ≤ 0.015). However, these differences were not present at age-matched midchildhood evaluation (median, RSCP, 6.5; CP only, 7.1; P ≥ 0.092). Median age-matched follow-up was 6.4 years in the MDO group and 7.1 years in the control group ( P ≥ 0.136). There was also no difference in the rate of secondary speech surgery at midchildhood evaluation ( P ≥ 0.688).The authors' retrospective comparison of speech outcomes in RSCP versus CP only demonstrates no difference in midchildhood speech, conflicting with recent reports. Although patients with Robin sequence treated with MDO had worse visible nasal emission, hypernasality, and compensatory articulation in early childhood, this appears to have resolved in the interim without additional intervention. Longitudinal follow-up is needed to fully understand the speech ramifications of RSCP.Risk, II.

This study tested the core tenets of how facial scars are perceived by characterizing layperson response to faces with scars. The authors predicted that scars closer to highly viewed structures of the face (i.e., upper lip and lower lid), scars aligned against resting facial tension lines, and scars in the middle of anatomical subunits of the face would be rated less favorably.Volunteers aged 18 years and older from the United States were recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk to complete a face rating survey. Scars were digitally added in different locations and orientations for a total of 14 unique scars added to each face. Each participant rated 50 different faces on confidence, friendliness, and attractiveness. Data were analyzed using linear mixed effects models.A total of 88,850 ratings [82,990 scarred (93.4 percent)] for attractiveness, friendliness, and confidence were analyzed. In univariate linear mixed effects models, the presence of a facial scar did not significantly impact attractiveness (β = 0.016, SE = 0.014, z = 1.089, p = 0.276). A second set of linear mixed effects models identified interactions between location, subunit placement, and orientation to facial tension lines. Scars located on the lower lid mid subunit perpendicular to facial tension lines were rated less attractive (β = -0.065, SE = 0.028, z = -2.293, p = 0.022).On average, a single well-healed facial scar does not negatively affect first impressions of attractiveness, confidence, or friendliness. Specific scar location and orientation combinations, however, such as a perpendicular scar at the mid-lower eyelid, may result in lower perceived attractiveness, confidence, and friendliness.Risk, III.

A larger volume cranial vault expansion is likely facilitated by a low posterior cranial osteotomy beneath the torcula; however, this may impart an increased risk of venous bleeding. The authors compared the safety of infratorcular versus supratorcular osteotomy in patients undergoing posterior vault reconstruction or posterior vault distraction osteogenesis and analyzed volumetric changes.Patients undergoing initial posterior vault reconstruction or distraction osteogenesis between 2009 and 2021 at the authors' institution were grouped by occipital osteotomy location and analyzed retrospectively. Craniometric analysis was performed if patients had high-resolution computed tomography scans available within 180 days preoperatively and postoperatively.A total of 187 patients were included: 106 (57 percent) who underwent posterior vault distraction osteogenesis and 81 (43 percent) who underwent posterior vault reconstruction. Infratorcular osteotomy was more common in reconstruction [ n = 65 (80 percent)] than in distraction osteogenesis [ n = 61 (58 percent); p0.002]. Blood transfused was similar between low and high osteotomy cohorts in the distraction osteogenesis ( p = 0.285) and reconstruction ( p = 0.342) groups. However, median transfused blood volume per kilogram of patient weight was greater in the low versus high osteotomy distraction osteogenesis ( p = 0.010) and reconstruction ( p = 0.041) cohorts. Intraoperative venous sinus injury was rare. In the distraction osteogenesis cohort, there was increased median intracranial volumetric gain in the low (263 ml) compared with the high osteotomy cohort (127 ml; p = 0.043); however, when controlled for distraction distance, only a trend was observed ( p = 0.221). Patients undergoing distraction osteogenesis showed a larger median intracranial volume increase (168 ml) compared with those undergoing reconstruction (73 ml; p0.001).Infratorcular osteotomy can be performed safely in most patients undergoing cranial vault remodeling and does not appear to be associated with greater hemodynamic instability or sinus injury.Therapeutic, III.

Anterior cranial vault fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis is a promising treatment modality for children with unicoronal craniosynostosis. A minimally invasive, endoscope-assisted approach offers the additional potential benefits of less scalp scarring, decreased blood loss, and decreased scalp dissection. In this article, the authors present a novel technique for minimally invasive, endoscope-assisted fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis.

BACKGROUND: Macroglossia, a cardinal feature of the (epi)genetic disorder Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, is associated with obstructive sleep apnea, speech and/or feeding difficulties, and dental or jaw malalignment. These sequelae may be treated and/or prevented with tongue reduction surgery; the authors sought to determine whether certain Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome patients may benefit from early surgical intervention before age 12 months. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome who underwent tongue reduction from 2014 to 2019. The authors assessed primary outcomes of change in obstructive sleep apnea by polysomnography, respiratory support required, and feeding route before and after tongue reduction, and reviewed postoperative complications and the need for repeated tongue reduction. RESULTS: Of the 36 patients included, the median age at tongue reduction was 9.5 months (interquartile range, 3.8 to 22.8 months). For those with severe obstructive sleep apnea, there was a significant reduction in the obstructive apnea hypopnea index from 30.9 ± 21.8 per hour to 10.0 ± 18.3 per hour (p = 0.019) and improvement in nadir oxyhemoglobin saturation from 72 ± 10 percent to 83 ± 6 percent (p = 0.008). Although there was no significant change in overall supplemental feeding tube or respiratory support, there were specific patients who experienced clinically meaningful improvement. Of note, these positive outcomes applied equally to those who underwent surgery at a younger age (

BACKGROUND Fusion of cranial-base sutures/synchondroses presents a clinical conundrum, given their often unclear "normal" timing of closure. This study investigates the physiologic fusion timelines of cranial-base sutures/synchondroses. METHODS Twenty-three age intervals were analyzed in subjects aged 0 to 18 years. For each age interval, 10 head computed tomographic scans of healthy subjects were assessed. Thirteen cranial-base sutures/synchondroses were evaluated for patency. Partial closure in greater than or equal to 50 percent of subjects and complete bilateral closure in less than 50 percent of subjects defined the fusion "midpoint." Factor analysis identified clusters of related fusion patterns. RESULTS Two hundred thirty scans met inclusion criteria. The sutures' fusion midpoints and completion ages, respectively, were as follows: frontoethmoidal, 0 to 2 months and 4 years; frontosphenoidal, 6 to 8 months and 12 years; and sphenoparietal, 6 to 8 months and 4 years. Sphenosquamosal, sphenopetrosal, parietosquamosal, and parietomastoid sutures reached the midpoint at 6 to 8 months, 8 years, 9 to 11 months, and 12 years, respectively, but rarely completed fusion. The occipitomastoid suture partially closed in less than or equal to 30 percent of subjects. The synchondroses' fusion midpoints and completion ages, respectively, were as follows: sphenoethmoidal, 3 to 5 months and 5 years; spheno-occipital, 9 years and 17 years; anterior intraoccipital, 4 years and 10 years; and posterior intraoccipital, 18 to 23 months and 4 years. The petro-occipital synchondrosis reached the midpoint at 11 years and completely fused in less than 50 percent of subjects. Order of fusion of the sutures, but not the synchondroses, followed the anterior-to-posterior direction. Factor analysis suggested three separate fusion patterns. CONCLUSIONS The fusion timelines of cranial-base sutures/synchondroses may help providers interpret computed tomographic data of patients with head-shape abnormalities. Future work should elucidate the mechanisms and sequelae of cranial-base suture fusion that deviates from normal timelines.

BACKGROUND Resorbable hardware allows adequate strength for maintaining the relative position of the craniofacial skeleton during osseous healing, and allowing subsequent growth in pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the complication profile of the latest copolymer of resorbable plates for craniofacial reconstruction in pediatric patients. METHODS Retrospective query of the operative billing record was performed for use of the DePuy Synthes Rapidsorb Fixation System at the authors' tertiary children's hospital from 2015 to 2019. Three hundred twenty-five patients were randomly selected for analysis of complications within the first postoperative year. RESULTS Median age at craniofacial reconstruction was 3.0 years, with 127 procedures (39.9 percent) performed for an intracranial mass and 141 procedures (44.3 percent) performed for craniosynostosis. Overall, 7.9 percent patients had a postoperative wound complication. The most common complications were dehiscence (3.8 percent), hematoma/seroma (3.5 percent), and infection (2.5 percent). There were no instances of extrusion, plate fracture, or screw loosening. Hardware complications in the temporoparietal region were more likely to occur at incision sites (p = 0.001), whereas wound complications at the frontal region were more likely to occur away from incision sites (p < 0.001). There were no differences in complications between plates secured with resorbable screws or with the resorbable injectable polymer system (p ≥ 0.161 for all). Radiotherapy was significantly implicated in development of clinical infection (p = 0.001), culture-positive infection (p < 0.001), readmission (p = 0.007), reoperation (p = 0.003), and plate removal (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION Resorbable cranial hardware has an overall favorable complication profile for craniofacial reconstruction in pediatric patients undergoing surgical intervention for craniosynostosis or intracranial mass resection.

Background/Purpose: Patients with syndromic craniosynostosis and midface hypoplasia often undergo midface advancement to improve respiratory function, orbital relationships, and facial appearance. This study characterizes the perioperative morbidity of a large cohort of subjects who underwent transcranial or subcranial midface distraction. Methods: Demographic and perioperative data were compared between those who underwent transcranial or subcranial midface DO between July 1999 and December 2017. Univariate analysis was conducted using chi-square and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Multivariate analysis was conducted using logistic regression modeling. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: Sixty-four subjects (34 female, 30 male) underwent a total of 71 midface distraction procedures. There was a total of 28 (39%) complications. The transcranial cohort had a significantly higher frequency of complications (58%) compared to the subcranial cohort (29%, p=0.017), with a significantly greater proportion of infection-related complications in the transcranial cohort (80% vs 54%, p=0.028). Transcranial complications included cranial contamination, whereas most subcranial cohort infections were superficial or limited facial abscesses. The only significant predictor variable for complications in a multivariate analysis was whether the osteotomy approach was transcranial as opposed to subcranial, with an odds ratio of 5.80 (p=0.013). Conclusion: Complication rates in midface distraction remain high, with transcranial procedures having significantly higher complication rates, infection-related complications, and notably greater severity of complications. While the goals of surgery often dictate choice of osteotomy, thorough understanding of the risks associated with transcranial procedures must be understood by surgeon and patient alike.

Background Timing of frontofacial surgery for the syndromic craniosynostosis as it relates to various surgical risks has not been adequately studied. The purpose of this study was to investigate posterior dental complications of midface advancement in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis undergoing surgery at different ages and the effects on subsequent orthognathic surgery. Methods A retrospective chart review of patients with syndromic craniosynostosis treated with midface advancement (monobloc or Le Fort III) from 1999 to 2018 was carried out. Patient demographics, records, and imaging studies were reviewed. A subanalysis of those patients who were also treated with orthognathic surgery from 2014 to 2018 with imaging studies available for analysis was also performed. Results Thirty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-four percent of the patients had radiographic evidence of maxillary molar dental abnormality. Older age at the time of surgery was significantly associated with a lower odds of sustaining dental injury (OR, 0.55; p = 0.034). The odds of damaging second or third maxillary molars was significantly higher with a younger age at the time of surgery (p = 0.021 and p = 0.034). The odds of sustaining dental injury increased moving posteriorly, showing the risk of abnormal pattern of M3 greater than M2 greater than M1. Advanced age at the time of surgery was significantly associated with decreased odds of dental injury (OR, 0.55; p = 0.034). Conclusions Damage to the developing permanent maxillary molars may affect orthodontic management, mastication, and potentially maxillary development. Delaying frontofacial surgery until development of the permanent maxillary dentition should be considered if other indications do not mandate earlier intervention.

The purpose of this study was to delineate optimal age to perform unilateral or bilateral cleft lip repair in premature patients. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric data set was queried for unilateral and bilateral cleft lip repairs performed between 2012 and 2017. Complications, readmissions, and reoperations were analyzed in the context of prematurity with appropriate statistics. Degree of prematurity was significantly associated with adverse events (p = 0.001, rs = 0.44). Premature patients with unilateral cleft lip had a significantly decreased risk of adverse events when performing cleft lip repair after 150 days of age [OR, 18.1; p = 0.004; before cutoff, n = 10 of 140 (7.1 percent); after cutoff, n = 0 of 112 (0.0 percent)] in the absence of other risk factors. Premature patients with bilateral cleft lip had a significantly decreased risk of adverse events when performing cleft lip repair after 175 days of age (OR, 16.1; p = 0.010; before cutoff, n = 7 of 33 (21.2 percent); after cutoff, n = 0 of 28 (0.0 percent)] in the absence of other risk factors. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Risk, II.

BACKGROUND Patients undergoing orthognathic skeletal correction present with a variety of comorbidities that may affect surgical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine how patient risk factors and operative technique contribute to complication rates after orthognathic surgery in the era of patient-specific implants. METHODS Retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of pediatric patients undergoing Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, and/or genioplasty from 2014 to 2018. Patient risk factors, operative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were gathered and compared with appropriate statistics. RESULTS Ninety-four patients met inclusion criteria, with an overall 1-year complication rate of 11.7 percent (11 of 94). Patient-specific mandibular plates are significantly associated with infection (p = 0.009; OR, 8.8), occurrence of any complication (p = 0.003; OR, 8.3), readmission (p < 0.001; OR, 11.1), and reoperation (p < 0.001; OR, 11.4). In patients with syndromes or history of cleft lip/palate, patient-specific mandibular plates are associated with infection (p = 0.006; OR, 10.3), readmission (p < 0.001; OR, 21.6), and reoperation (p < 0.001; OR, 22.9). In multivariate regression controlling for age, sex, syndrome status, and orofacial cleft history, use of patient-specific mandibular plates was associated with infection (p = 0.017; adjusted OR, 12.5), any complication (p = 0.007; adjusted OR, 11.8), readmission (p = 0.001; adjusted OR, 17.9), and reoperation (p = 0.001; adjusted OR, 18.9). CONCLUSIONS In the era of patient-specific orthognathic surgery, syndromic status and use of patient-specific mandibular plates are associated with increased infection, readmission, and reoperation because of hardware-related complications. The authors' data support increased caution and counseling with use of patient-specific mandibular implants in patients with syndromic status, history of orofacial cleft, and history of previous maxillomandibular surgery given increased risk of hardware-related complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine what craniometric changes occur to both orbits of unicoronal craniosynostosis patients undergoing fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling, and which of these changes are associated with new onset of postoperative strabismus. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed of the preoperative and postoperative orbits of 24 unicoronal craniosynostosis patients and the orbits of 24 control subjects, totaling 144 orbits. Eight parameters were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. One of the parameters was modified orbital index, an indicator of severity of harlequin deformity. RESULTS Significant differences in orbital dimensions and angles were present bilaterally in unicoronal craniosynostosis orbits when compared to controls. Fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling increased the ipsilateral unicoronal craniosynostosis orbital volume from 13,184 ± 2003 mm to 16,220 ± 2323 mm (p < 0.001). Ipsilateral horizontal cone angles were increased from 48 ± 5 degrees to 54 ± 7 degrees (p = 0.004). Ipsilateral vertical cone angles were decreased from 73 ± 8 degrees to 66 ± 10 degrees (p = 0.003). Ipsilateral modified orbital index improved from 0.83 ± 0.06 to 0.88 ± 0.06 (p = 0.003). Three of the 19 unicoronal craniosynostosis patients developed transient postoperative strabismus. Logistic regression analysis displayed a strong significant association between new-onset strabismus and a change in modified orbital index with a coefficient of 30.84 ± 14.51 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The orbital dysmorphology in unicoronal craniosynostosis is bilateral in nature, and it is not wholly treated with conventional fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. The severity of ipsilateral orbital dysmorphology is correlated with the incidence of postoperative strabismus following conventional fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. Future research is needed to develop strategies to mitigate the risk of development of strabismus in this group of patients. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Risk, III.

Background The purpose of this Web-based survey was to elucidate the current perspectives of plastic surgery residency program directors on training residents to perform gender-affirming surgery. Methods Web-based surveys were distributed to 79 plastic surgery program directors. Demographic information and perspectives on training of gender-affirming surgery in plastic surgery residency were queried. Results Of 79 distributed surveys, there were 43 responses (54 percent). Overall, program directors reported that their trainees were prepared to address plastic surgery-related transgender concerns (67 percent), and believe plastic surgeons are the most appropriate specialty referral for each type of gender-affirming surgery (top/chest, 98 percent; facial, 95 percent; and bottom/genital, 79 percent). Ninety-three percent of program directors noted that transgender surgery is becoming more accepted and/or practiced in their referral area, with 26 percent reporting a dedicated clinic experience. There was a mixed response on the need for additional fellowship training for gender-affirming surgery. Residents are exposed to significantly more bottom (p = 0.0018), top (p = 0.0013), and facial operations (p = 0.00005) if they rotate through a "gender" clinic. Conclusions Of the queried program directors, the majority feel their residents are well-trained in gender-affirming surgery. However, residents have more clinical exposure in facial and top (chest) gender-affirming surgery as compared to bottom (genital) surgery. Although most program directors agree that plastic surgeons are the most important referral for top, bottom, and facial operations, there is less consensus over the role of fellowship training. Most program directors reported a desire to devote additional CME time to the topic in the coming years.

Background Controversy exists regarding the treatment of mandibular hypoplasia in craniofacial microsomia patients, notably the role of mandibular distraction osteogenesis. The authors compared the need for orthognathic surgery in skeletally mature craniofacial microsomia subjects who either did (study group) or did not (control group) undergo early mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of all craniofacial microsomia patients evaluated between January of 1993 and March of 2017. This study included patients with a Kaban-Pruzansky grade I to III mandible, and who were at least 14 years old at the time of the latest follow-up. Results Thirty-eight subjects met inclusion criteria: 17 who underwent mandibular distraction osteogenesis and 21 who did not (mean age, 18.95 ± 2.82 years versus 17.95 ± 2.14 years, respectively; p = 0.246). The degree of mandibular deformity was matched (distraction, 29.4 percent Kaban-Pruzansky grade IIb and 5.9 percent grade III; no distraction, 23.8 percent grade IIb and 9.5 percent grade III; p = 0.788). No significant difference was noted between the distraction and no-distraction cohorts with regard to need for orthognathic surgery [distraction, n = 10 (58.8 percent); no distraction, n = 8 (38.1 percent); p = 0.203]. Conclusions The results seem to suggest that there is no significant difference in orthognathic surgery rates at skeletal maturity between craniofacial microsomia subjects who underwent early mandibular distraction osteogenesis and those who did not. Subjects who undergo distraction may still ultimately require orthognathic surgery to correct facial asymmetry. Additional studies are required to determine the optimal timing and technique of distraction, the importance of orthodontic management during and after distraction, and the early psychosocial benefits of improved facial symmetry. Clinical question/level of evidence Therapeutic, III.

BACKGROUND Sphenoid wing dysplasia in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 may result in challenging and significant changes, including ultimately vision loss. The authors describe the radiographic patterns of sphenoid dysmorphology with time and age, and the impact of surgical intervention on preservation of vision. METHODS A retrospective study was performed at a single pediatric hospital, identifying subjects with neurofibromatosis type 1. Records were reviewed in their entirety for each subject, with attention to ophthalmologic evaluation. Radiographic images were digitally analyzed and scored for sphenoid transformations on a grade of 0 to 3. RESULTS Fifty-two subjects were identified. On initial imaging, 42.31 percent had a normal sphenoid (grade 0), 32.69 percent had an abnormal contour (grade 1), 11.54 percent had thinning (grade 2), and 13.46 percent had a gross defect (grade 3). Among the 45 subjects with serial imaging, 55.56 percent demonstrated progression of the deformity of at least one grade. Deformity progression correlated with length of imaging interval. Enucleation was noted to occur more often in subjects with a gross sphenoid defect (p < 0.0001). Of subjects identified as having a gross sphenoid defect, 26.7 percent were managed using orbitosphenoid reconstruction with titanium mesh and cranial bone graft, and 33.3 percent were managed with soft-tissue debulking and canthopexy only. Vision was more likely to be preserved with early orbitosphenoid reconstruction (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Sphenoid dysplasia is a progressive disease. Loss of vision is associated with a gross defect, and appears to be better preserved with early orbitosphenoid reconstruction with titanium mesh and cranial bone graft.

There is a paucity of literature directly comparing tongue-lip adhesion versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis in surgical treatment of patients with Pierre Robin sequence. This study comprehensively reviews the literature for evaluating airway and feeding outcomes following mandibular distraction osteogenesis and tongue-lip adhesion. A search was performed using the MEDLINE and Embase databases for publications between 1960 and June of 2017. English-language, original studies subjects were included. Extracted data included prevention of tracheostomy (primary airway outcome) and ability to feed exclusively by mouth (primary feeding outcome). A total of 67 studies were included. Ninety-five percent of subjects (657 of 693) treated with mandibular distraction osteogenesis avoided tracheostomy, compared to 89% of subjects (289 of 323) treated with tongue-lip adhesion. Eighty-seven percent of subjects (323 of 370) treated with mandibular distraction osteogenesis achieved full oral feeds at latest follow-up. Seventy percent of subjects (110 of 157) treated with tongue-lip adhesion achieved full oral feeds at latest follow-up. The incidence of second intervention for recurrent obstruction ranged from 4 to 6 percent in mandibular distraction osteogenesis studies, compared to a range of 22 to 45 percent in tongue-lip adhesion studies. Variability of patient selection, surgical techniques, outcomes measurement methods, and follow-up length across studies precluded meta-analysis of the data. Both mandibular distraction osteogenesis and tongue-lip adhesion are effective alternatives to tracheostomy for patients who fail conservative management and improve feeding. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis may be superior to tongue-lip adhesion in long-term resolution of airway obstruction and avoidance of gastrostomy, but is associated with notable complications.

BACKGROUND How hospital case-volume affects operative outcomes and cost continues to grow in importance. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of case volume with operative outcomes and cost in cleft palate repair. METHODS Subjects undergoing cleft palate repair between 2004 and 2015 were identified in the Pediatric Health Information System. Outcomes were compared between two groups: those undergoing treatment at a high-volume institution, and those undergoing treatment at a low-volume institution. Primary outcomes were as follows: any complication, prolonged length of stay, and increased total cost. RESULTS Over 20,000 patients (n = 20,320) from 49 institutions met inclusion criteria. On univariate analysis, those subjects who underwent treatment at a high-volume institution had a lower rate of overall complications (3.4 percent versus 5.1 percent; p < 0.001), and lower rates of prolonged length of stay (4.5 percent versus 5.8 percent; p < 0.001) and increased total cost (48.6 percent versus 50.9 percent; p = 0.002). In multivariate regression analyses, subjects treated in high-volume centers were less likely to experience any complication (OR, 0.678; p < 0.001) and were less likely to have an extended length of stay (OR, 0.82; p = 0.005). Subjects undergoing palate repair at a high-volume institution were no less likely to incur increased total cost (OR, 1.01; p = 0.805). CONCLUSION In institutions performing a high volume of cleft palate repairs, subjects had significantly decreased odds of experiencing a complication or prolonged length of stay. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.

BACKGROUND The relationships between hospital/surgeon characteristics and operative outcomes and cost are being scrutinized increasingly. In patients with craniosynostosis specifically, the relationship between hospital volume and outcomes has yet to be characterized. METHODS Subjects undergoing craniosynostosis surgery between 2004 and 2015 were identified in the Pediatric Health Information System. Outcomes were compared between two exposure groups, those undergoing treatment at a high-volume institution (>40 cases per year), and those undergoing treatment at a low-volume institution (40 cases per year). Primary outcomes were any complication, prolonged length of stay, and increased total cost. RESULTS Over 13,000 patients (n = 13,112) from 49 institutions met inclusion criteria. In multivariate regression analyses, subjects treated in high-volume centers were less likely to experience any complication (OR, 0.764; p < 0.001), were less likely to have an extended length of stay (OR, 0.624; p < 0.001), and were less likely to have increased total cost (OR, 0.596; p < 0.001). Subjects undergoing strip craniectomy in high-volume centers were also less likely to have any complication (OR, 0.708; p = 0.018) or increased total cost (OR, 0.51; p < 0.001). Subjects undergoing midvault reconstruction in high-volume centers were less likely to experience any complications (OR, 0.696; p = 0.002), have an extended length of stay (OR, 0.542; p < 0.001), or have increased total cost (OR, 0.495; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In hospitals performing a high volume of craniosynostosis surgery, subjects had significantly decreased odds of experiencing a complication, prolonged length of stay, or increased total cost compared with those undergoing treatment in low-volume institutions. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.

BACKGROUND The effects of orthognathic surgery go beyond objective cephalometric correction of facial and dental disproportion and malocclusion, respectively. The authors hypothesized that there is tangible improvement following surgery that alters publicly perceived personality traits and emotions. METHODS The authors used Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk (MTurk), a crowdsourcing tool, to determine how preoperative and postoperative images of orthognathic surgery patients were perceived on six personality traits and six emotional expressions based on posteroanterior and lateral photographs. Blinded respondents provided demographic information and were randomly assigned to one of two sets of 20 photographs (10 subjects before and after surgery). RESULTS Data on 20 orthognathic surgery patients were collected from 476 individuals. The majority of participants were female (52.6 percent), 18 to 39 years old (67.9 percent), Caucasian (76.6 percent), had some college or technical training or graduated college (72.7 percent), and had an annual income between $20,000 and $99,999 (74.6 percent). A paired t test analysis found that subjects were perceived significantly more favorably after orthognathic surgery in 12 countenance categories: more dominant, trustworthy, friendly, intelligent, attractive, and happy; and also less threatening, angry, surprised, sad, afraid, and disgusted (p < 0.05). Raters with the highest annual income perceived a greater magnitude of dominance after surgery than those earning less (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS There is significant improvement in the countenance of patients after orthognathic surgery, with both perceived personality traits and emotions deemed more favorable. Additional work is needed to better understand the physiologic underpinnings of such findings. Crowdsourcing technology offers a unique opportunity for surgeons to gather data regarding laypeople's perceptions of surgical outcomes in areas such as orthognathic surgery.

BACKGROUND Frontal sinus pneumatization plays an important role in brow protrusion, and absence of frontal sinus development may be associated with brow retrusion. Using unicoronal craniosynostosis as a model, the authors studied the relationship among frontal sinus volume, supraorbital retrusion, and brow position. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of unicoronal craniosynostosis patients with head computed tomographic scans and photographs taken from ages 5 to 18 years. Frontal sinus volume and supraorbital retrusion were calculated using three-dimensional computed tomographic reconstructions. A "brow score" from 0 to 3 was assigned to each patient's photographs by a consensus of two craniofacial surgeons; sinus morphology and brow scores were compared. RESULTS The study included 20 unicoronal craniosynostosis patients. The affected side demonstrated increased retrusion (7.1 ± 3.7 mm versus 3.0 ± 3.1 mm; p < 0.001) and decreased frontal sinus volume (0.8 ± 0.9 cc versus 2.6 ± 1.8 cc; p < 0.001). Qualitative brow retrusion scores differed between affected and unaffected sides (score of 0, 17 percent affected versus 78 percent unaffected; score of 1, 28 percent versus 22 percent; score of 2, 39 percent versus 0 percent; and score of 3, 17 percent versus 0 percent; p < 0.001). Brow scores trended with retrusion measurements (score of 0, 2.7 ± 2.9 mm retrusion; score of 1, 6.1 ± 3.5 mm; score of 2, 8.9 ± 3.2 mm; and score of 3, 9.7 ± 2.8 mm; p < 0.001). Subjects with brow scores of 0 or 1 had larger frontal sinus volumes than subjects with brow scores of 2 or 3 (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS Qualitative brow retrusion correlates strongly with both quantitative supraorbital retrusion and frontal sinus volume. Although this retrospective study cannot prove causality, which is likely multifactorial, its strong correlation with frontal sinus pneumatization highlights the importance of the frontal sinus in brow position in unicoronal craniosynostosis. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.

BACKGROUND Patients with syndromic craniosynostosis have an increased incidence of progressive hydrocephalus and Chiari malformations, with few data on the relative benefit of various surgical interventions. The authors compare the incidence and resolution of Chiari malformations and hydrocephalus between patients undergoing posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) and patients undergoing conventional cranial vault remodeling. METHODS Patients with syndromic craniosynostosis who underwent cranial vault surgery from 2004 to 2016 at a single academic hospital, with adequate radiographic assessments, were reviewed. Demographics, interventions, the presence of a Chiari malformation on radiographic studies and hydrocephalus requiring shunt placement were recorded. Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests were used as appropriate. RESULTS Forty-nine patients underwent PVDO, and 23 patients underwent cranial vault remodeling during the study period. Median age at surgery (p = 0.880), sex (p = 0.123), and types of syndrome (p = 0.583) were well matched. Patients who underwent PVDO had a decreased incidence of developing Chiari malformations postoperatively compared with the cranial vault remodeling cohort (2.0 percent versus 17.4 percent; p = 0.033). Not surprisingly, no significant difference was found between the groups with regard to the incidence of postoperative hydrocephalus requiring shunt placement (PVDO, 4.1 percent; cranial vault remodeling, 4.3 percent; p = 0.999). CONCLUSIONS As expected, PVDO did not significantly affect intracranial hydrodynamics to the extent that hydrocephalus shunting rates were different for patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. However, PVDO was associated with a reduced risk of developing a Chiari malformation; however, prospective evaluation is needed to determine causality. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.

BACKGROUND The frequency of respiratory events in the perioperative period, and optimal duration of intubation during early mandibular distraction osteogenesis activation, are poorly understood. This study assesses potential risk factors associated with perioperative respiratory events, particularly the need for reintubation, following mandibular distraction osteogenesis surgery. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted for infants (younger than 1 year) undergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis for tongue-based airway obstruction between November of 2010 and December of 2017. Univariate and multivariate analyses of sentinel events and outcomes were performed. RESULTS Ninety infants (median age, 35 days) were included (50 percent were syndromic). Twenty-seven subjects (30 percent) experienced a respiratory event requiring intervention before discharge, including 14 subjects who failed initial extubation. Subjects extubated earlier than postoperative day 5 failed extubation more frequently (33%) compared to those extubated later (9%; p = 0.005). Respiratory events occurred more frequently when extubation was attempted at distraction lengths of 5 mm or less (42 percent) compared to greater than 5 mm (21 percent; p = 0.032). Logistic regression modeling showed that syndromic status (OR, 14.8) and secondary airway anomaly (OR, 6.1) were significant predictors for respiratory events, whereas greater length of distraction at the time of extubation was protective (OR, 0.8; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Postoperative intubation of at least 5 days with associated mean distraction of 5 mm appears to be associated with successful extubation trial following mandibular distraction osteogenesis surgery. Patients with congenital syndromes and secondary airway anomalies are more likely to experience perioperative respiratory events. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Risk, III.

BACKGROUND This study compares hospital-based care and associated charges among children with cleft lip, cleft palate, or both, and identifies subgroups generating the greatest cumulative hospital charges. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of cleft lip, cleft palate, or cleft lip and palate who underwent initial surgery from 2006 to 2008 in four U.S. states. Primary outcome was hospital-based care-emergency, outpatient, inpatient-within 4 years of surgery. Regression models compared outcomes and classification tree analysis identified patients at risk for being in the highest quartile of cumulative hospital charges. RESULTS The authors identified 4571 children with cleft lip (18.2 percent), cleft palate (39.2 percent), or cleft lip and palate (42.6 percent). Medical comorbidity was frequent across all groups, with feeding difficulty (cleft lip, 2.4 percent; cleft palate, 13.4 percent; cleft lip and palate, 6.0 percent; p < 0.001) and developmental delay (cleft lip, 1.8 percent; cleft palate, 9.4 percent; cleft lip and palate, 3.6 percent; p < 0.001) being most common. Within 30 days of surgery, those with cleft palate were most likely to return to the hospital (p < 0.001). Hospital-based care per 100 children within 4 years was lowest among the cleft lip group, yet comparable among those with cleft palate and cleft lip and palate (p < 0.001). Cumulative 4-year charges, however, were highest among the cleft palate cohort (cleft lip, $56,966; cleft palate, $106,090; cleft lip and palate, $91,263; p < 0.001). Comorbidity, diagnosis (cleft lip versus cleft palate with or without cleft lip), and age at initial surgery were the most important factors associated with the highest quartile of cumulative hospital charges. CONCLUSIONS Cleft lip and palate children experience a high rate of hospital-based care early in life, with degree of medical comorbidity being a significant burden. Understanding this relationship and associated needs may help deliver more efficient, patient-centered care.

BACKGROUND Facial scarring and disharmony caused by clefting are associated with psychosocial stress, which may be improved by orthognathic surgery. The authors examine how clefting influences change in layperson perception of a patient following orthognathic surgery. METHODS One thousand laypersons were recruited through Mechanical Turk to evaluate patient photographs before and after orthognathic surgery. Nineteen patients-five with unilateral and five with bilateral clefting-were included. Respondents assessed six personality traits, six emotional expressions, and likelihood of seven interpersonal experiences on a scale from 1 to 7. RESULTS Changes in all aspects of social perception after the procedure differed significantly between cleft versus noncleft cohorts (p < 0.01 for all). Respondents evaluated the change for the cleft cohort compared with the noncleft cohort as more trustworthy, friendly, sad, and afraid; more likely to feel lonely, be teased or bullied by others, or feel anxious around others; less angry, disgusted, threatening, dominant, intelligent, happy, and attractive; and less likely to have romantic relationships, friends, or be praised by others. For unilateral versus bilateral cleft cohorts, change in social perception was significantly different in four of the 19 items (p < 0.05 for all). Social perception change for the unilateral cohort was less surprised, sad, dominant, or happy compared with the bilateral cohort (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS Despite significant improvements in social perception following orthognathic surgery, cleft patients benefit less than noncleft patients. These findings may be useful to counsel postsurgical expectations for cleft patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Identify skeletal differences that are treated with orthognathic surgery; describe the goals of orthognathic surgery; and understand modern virtual surgical planning of orthognathic movement of the mandible, maxilla, and chin. 2. Appreciate the surgical principles of maxilla- versus mandible-first surgery, and orthognathic surgery before orthodontic correction; and understand when an osseous genioplasty may be beneficial, and the potency of this bony movement. 3. Appreciate the utility of fat grafting as an adjunct to orthognathic bony movements, and demonstrate understanding of the utility of orthognathic surgery in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. 4. Be aware of associated complications and be able to critically assess outcomes following orthognathic surgery.This CME article outlines the goals of orthognathic surgery, highlighting advances in the field and current controversies. The principles of the sequencing of osteotomies are discussed and literature is reviewed that may assist in decision-making as to maxilla-first versus mandible-first surgery. The emergence of "surgery first," in which surgery precedes orthodontics, is discussed and important parameters for patient candidacy for such a procedure are provided. The emerging standard of virtual surgical planning is described, and a video is provided that walks the reader through a planning session. Soft-tissue considerations are highlighted, especially in the context of osseous genioplasty and fat grafting to the face. The utility of orthognathic surgery in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea is discussed. The reader is provided with the most current data on complications following orthognathic surgery and advice on avoiding such pitfalls. Finally, outcome assessment focusing on the most current trend of patient-reported satisfaction and the psychological impact of orthognathic surgery are discussed.

Cranial base sutures are important drivers of both facial and cranial growth. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence and location of cranial base suture fusion among three groups: nonaffected controls, patients with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, and patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.Patients and computed tomographic scans were accrued from the authors' prospective craniofacial database. Computed tomographic scans were graded on the frequency of cranial vault and cranial base suture/synchondrosis fusion (0, open; 1, partially/completely fused) by an attending craniofacial surgeon and neuroradiologist. Statistical comparisons were conducted on location and rates of fusion, age, and diagnosis.One hundred forty patients met inclusion criteria: 55 syndromic, 64 nonsyndromic, and 21 controls. Average age at computed tomography of syndromic patients (3.6 ± 3.1 months) was younger than that of nonsyndromic patients (5.4 ± 3.1 months; p = 0.001) and control subjects (5.1 ± 3.2 months; p = 0.058). Syndromic craniosynostotic patients had over three times as many cranial base minor sutures fused (2.2 ± 2.5) as nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients (0.7 ± 1.2; p0.001) and controls (0.4 ± 0.8; p = 0.002), whose rates of fusion were statistically equivalent (p = 0.342). Syndromic craniosynostosis patients had a greater frequency of cranial base suture fusion in the coronal branches, squamosal arch, and posterior intraoccipital synchondrosis (p0.05).Patients with syndromic craniosynostosis have higher rates of cranial base suture fusion in infancy, especially in the coronal arches, and this may have significant implications for both cranial and facial growth. In contrast, patients with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis have similar rates and sites of cranial base suture fusion as controls. Interestingly, there is a low, "normal," rate of cranial base suture/synchondrosis closure in infancy, the implications of which are unknown.Risk, III.

Background Craniofacial microsomia encompasses a spectrum of diagnoses associated with variable degrees of mandibular hypoplasia, facial asymmetry, chin deviation, occlusal abnormalities, and potential airway compromise. This study presents one surgeon's experience with costochondral rib grafting for mandibular reconstruction in children with Pruzansky/Kaban type 2B and type 3 mandibular hypoplasia. Methods An institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review was performed of all patients with craniofacial microsomia who underwent costochondral rib grafting for mandibular reconstruction performed by the senior author (S.P.B.) at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from January of 1998 to September of 2013. Demographic information, surgical history, operative details, postoperative complications, and outcomes were recorded. Plain radiographs and preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional computed tomographic scans were reviewed. Results Two hundred fifty-five patients were diagnosed with craniofacial microsomia, and 22 patients met inclusion criteria. Twelve boys and 10 girls underwent grafting at an average age of 7.2 years. Thirty-three costochondral rib grafts were performed, 11 unilateral reconstructions and 11 bilateral reconstructions. Twelve hemimandibles were type 2B and 21 were type 3. No intraoperative complications were reported, and no incidence of graft resorption was noted. No additional procedures were required in 27 reconstructed hemimandibles (81.8 percent), whereas six (18.2 percent) required secondary distraction osteogenesis. Only one patient developed postoperative ankylosis. No malunion or nonunion was noted. Conclusion The approach described in this article allowed the authors to obtain reliably good results with costochondral rib grafting for type 2B and type 3 mandibular hypoplasia associated with craniofacial microsomia. Clinical question/level of evidence Therapeutic, IV.

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the role of prenatal screening and counseling of parents of unborn children with syndromic craniosynostosis. 2. Recognize the genetic abnormalities, craniofacial phenotype, associated anomalies, and challenges associated with each of the five major forms of syndromic craniosynostosis. 3. Identify the pros and cons associated with timing and types of cranial vault remodeling techniques in this patient population. 4. Understand the risks and benefits associated with midface advancement with Le Fort III, Le Fort II plus zygomatic repositioning, monobloc, and facial bipartition. 5. Understand the important role of psychological counseling throughout childhood in this at-risk group.Crouzon, Apert, Pfeiffer, Muenke, and Saethre-Chotzen syndromes are the five most common forms of syndromic craniosynostosis. Although each has different genetic underpinnings and associated anomalies, their hallmark finding is turribrachycephaly most often associated with bicoronal craniosynostosis. The role of prenatal screening and counseling is growing, with caregivers becoming involved before birth. Multidisciplinary care from birth onward involves craniofacial plastic surgeons, neurosurgeons, otolaryngologists, ophthalmologists, orthodontists, anesthesiologists, psychologists, speech therapists, and geneticists. Early partial, or regional, craniectomy may be urgently indicated in multisuture cases with signs of increased intracranial pressure. Others may be managed successfully with posterior cranial vault distraction, middle vault expansion, or fronto-orbital advancement. Some authors have advocated early monobloc advancement for those patients who require acute airway intervention and globe protection, although the risks of these procedures are high. Many patients will require midfacial advancement with a Le Fort III, Le Fort II plus zygomatic repositioning, monobloc, or facial bipartition. The indications, risks, and benefits for each midfacial procedure must be considered, as this step in the treatment algorithm may carry the greatest functional and aesthetic benefits but also the potential for the greatest morbidity. At the culmination of facial growth, it is not uncommon for patients to require conventional orthognathic surgery and other bony contouring and soft-tissue procedures. Finally, an understanding of the psychological aspects of craniofacial difference, both in affected individuals and in their families, is essential to a successful, holistic approach.

BACKGROUND The Whitaker classification is a simple and widely used system for describing aesthetic outcomes after craniosynostosis surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate its interrater reliability for patients who have undergone fronto-orbital surgery. METHODS A retrospective review of patients with craniosynostosis who underwent surgical intervention at a tertiary referral center was conducted. Inclusion criteria were as follows: single-suture craniosynostosis, surgical intervention before age 2 years, and photographs taken before revisions between 5 and 20 years of age. Thirteen craniofacial surgeons independently reviewed the subjects' photographs and assigned Whitaker classifications. Interrater reliability was assessed with the Cohen kappa statistic. RESULTS Twenty-nine subjects were included. Average ages at surgery and at the time of postoperative photography were 0.8 year and 12.8 years, respectively. The κ value for all 13 raters was 0.1567 (p < 0.0001), indicating "slight agreement." Pairwise comparisons demonstrated κ values ranging from 0.0384 to 0.5492. The average rating for the set of 29 photographs differed significantly across the 13 raters (p = 0.0020) and ranged from 1.79 ± 0.68 to 2.79 ± 0.77. Finally, we found that average Whitaker classification did not differ significantly between subjects who subsequently underwent cranioplasty and/or fronto-orbital advancement and those who did not (subsequent procedures, 2.45 ± 0.55; no subsequent procedures, 1.88 ± 0.78; p = 0.1087). CONCLUSIONS The Whitaker classification exhibits low interrater reliability and does not predict future treatment. It may benefit craniofacial surgeons to create new evaluation tools with greater precision, to improve the quality of patient care and craniofacial outcomes research.

BACKGROUND Infants with craniofacial dysostosis syndromes may present with midface abnormalities but without major (calvarial) suture synostosis and head shape anomalies. Delayed presentation of their calvarial phenotype is known as progressive postnatal craniosynostosis. Minor sutures/synchondroses are continuations of major sutures toward and within the skull base. The authors hypothesized that minor suture synostosis is present in infants with syndromic, progressive postnatal craniosynostosis, and is associated with major suture synostosis. METHODS The authors performed a two-institution review of infants (

Background Children with craniofacial disorders are at increased risk for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Methods for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in this population remain controversial. Sleep studies are the criterion standard but are impractical for all patients. The utility of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome questionnaires such as the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire is unknown in children with craniofacial disorders. The authors hypothesized that the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire would be a sensitive tool for detecting obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children with craniofacial abnormalities. Methods A retrospective review of consecutive children with diagnosed craniofacial disorders who both completed the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire and underwent polysomnography was performed. Demographics, Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire score, and polysomnographic data were recorded. Statistical analysis included calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire. Results Eighty-three children aged 2 to 18 years were included in the study. Of these, 44 (53.0 percent) screened positive on the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire and 23 (27.7 percent) had polysomnographic evidence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, but the sensitivity of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire for detecting obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in this sample was only 0.57 and the specificity was 0.48. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.30 and 0.74, respectively. The correlation between the apnea hypopnea index and Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire score was 0.152 (p = 0.17). Conclusions A substantial portion of craniofacial patients referred for polysomnography was found to have obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. However, the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire is not a good screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children with craniofacial conditions. More research is needed to determine which patients with craniofacial disorders should be evaluated for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome by polysomnography or other means. Clinical question/level of evidence Diagnostic, II.

Background: The purpose of this study was to identify variables that may preoperatively predict successful outcomes in ambulatory cleft lip repair and to quantify the potential cost savings. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent cleft lip repair at a tertiary cleft care center from January of 2010 to May of 2013 was performed. Because inpatient stay is the authors’ current practice, overnight desaturations, poor oral intake, and failure to stop intravenous narcotics during the first day were considered indicators of a poor candidate. Charge data were also collected. Results: Twenty-nine of 111 patients were deemed likely to fail ambulatory surgery. American Society of Anesthesiologists score greater than 2 (p = 0.019), low birth weight (p = 0.022), bilateral cleft lip–cleft palate (p = 0.003), central nervous system or neurologic diagnosis (p = 0.046), syndromic and/or multiple congenital abnormalities (p = 0.024), prior emergency room visits (p = 0.021), failure to thrive (p = 0.046), and age older than 7 months (p = 0.028) were associated with poor candidacy. A diagnosis of cleft lip was protective (p = 0.015). Fifty-five patients had no risk factors for a poor ambulatory outcome and did not stay more than 1 day. The average savings per patient who met the authors’ criteria was $4261. Conclusions: The authors found that 49.5 percent of children may be safely eligible for ambulatory cleft lip repair. Patients with risk factors may be best served by a short hospital admission. This would lead to a national savings of $8,765,183 per year.

Background Commercially available recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP2) has demonstrated efficacy in bone regeneration, but not without significant side effects. In this study, we utilize rhBMP2 encapsulated in PLGA microspheres (PLGA-rhBMP2) placed in a rabbit cranial defect model to test whether low-dose, sustained, delivery can effectively induce bone regeneration.

Background Secondary cleft nasal deformity is a combination of the inherent cleft defects and the effects of operations to address the primary nasal deformity. The authors revisited a modified V-Y chondromucosal flap to restore symmetric nostril shape and balanced tip projection. Methods A retrospective case-control study of the senior author's (J.A.T.) experience with secondary cleft tip rhinoplasty using the V-Y chondromucosal flap was conducted. Preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior and worm's-eye photographs were compared by means of photogrammetric analysis. Results were compared with those of controls who had not undergone surgery. Interrater reliability was assessed using the Pearson coefficient. Results Seventeen cases and 24 controls were reviewed. Average age at repair was 9.3±3.6 years; average follow-up was 13 months. Interrater reliability was 0.98 overall. Photogrammetric analysis demonstrated postoperative increases in cleft-side columella length by 2.3 mm (p=0.0001) and nasal apex height by 1.3 mm (p=0.003); non-cleft-side measurements were statistically unchanged. Control measurements were similar across 1-year visit interval, and when compared with cases, patients undergoing tip rhinoplasty had significantly different cleft-side columella length postoperatively (increase of 2.31 mm versus 0.15 mm; p=0.0002) and nasal apex height (increase of 1.29 mm versus 0.17 mm; p=0.03). All other parameters remained comparable. No complications and no external nasal valve collapse were observed. Conclusions In select patients, use of a V-Y chondromucosal flap increased cleft-side nasal tip projection and columellar height, improving overall nasal tip appearance. Although absolute width of the cleft alar base is unchanged, the cleft-side nostril is qualitatively more symmetric postoperatively. Clinical question/level of evidence Therapeutic, III.

Background:The authors examined hemifacial microsomia using three-dimensional computed tomography and the Kaban modification of the Pruzansky classification to determine its relationship with traditional evaluation and its reproducibility among evaluators.Methods:A retrospective review of all patien

Fronto-orbital advancement for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis has been thought to injure frontal sinus buds, lead to chronic sinus disease, and influence final forehead shape. This study investigates the effect of fronto-orbital advancement in infancy on subsequent frontal sinus volume, morphology, and disease.The authors conducted a retrospective review of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients treated with fronto-orbital advancement in infancy with a head computed tomographic scan obtained at age 7 to 18 years. Facial trauma patients served as age-matched controls. Frontal sinus characteristics were determined using three-dimensional reconstructions.The study included 33 nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients who underwent fronto-orbital advancement (n = 20 unicoronal; n = 13 metopic) and 20 control patients. The incidence of at least unilateral pneumatization was 94 percent for fronto-orbital advancement subjects and 95 percent for control subjects. Mean frontal sinus volumes for unicoronal synostosis, metopic synostosis, and control groups were 3427 ± 2294, 4576 ± 3510, and 4157 ± 3963 mm, respectively (p = 0.598). Asymmetry scores were as follows: unicoronal synostosis, 56 ± 35 percent; metopic synostosis, 36 ± 33 percent; and control, 23 ± 24 percent (p = 0.010). Unicoronal subjects displayed prominent asymmetry, with increased pneumatization on the unaffected side. Frontal sinus volume correlated with age at computed tomography but not with age at fronto-orbital advancement. Interrater reliability was 0.997. One fronto-orbital advancement subject and zero control subjects demonstrated computed tomographic evidence of frontal sinus disease.Frontal sinus volume, morphology, and disease do not differ significantly between control subjects and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis subjects following fronto-orbital advancement, but subtle differences such as increased asymmetry in the unicoronal synostosis group can be appreciated. Further research with syndromic craniosynostosis patients undergoing multiple procedures may help elucidate the association between surgical disruption and frontal sinus development.Therapeutic, III.

The authors hypothesize that early posterior vault distraction osteogenesis safely confers considerable cranial vault remodeling, sufficient to enable fronto-orbital advancement to be delayed to a later age, with improved outcomes.The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of children with syndromic craniosynostosis treated before (2003 to 2008) or after (2009 to 2014) implementation of posterior vault distraction osteogenesis.Sixty children with syndromic craniosynostosis presented during the study period. Forty met inclusion criteria with care continuity and complete records: 22 before and 18 after implementation of posterior vault distraction osteogenesis. Only 11 patients (61 percent) who underwent initial posterior vault distraction osteogenesis required frontal advancement, at a mean follow-up of 4.0 years of age, compared with 22 patients (100 percent) before implementation of posterior vault distraction osteogenesis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated significant delay of first fronto-orbital advancement in the posterior vault distraction osteogenesis cohort compared with the pre-posterior vault distraction osteogenesis cohort (p = 0.011). Comparing treatment in the first 5 years of life among posterior vault distraction osteogenesis versus non-posterior vault distraction osteogenesis subcohorts of patients older than 5 years, there were significantly fewer fronto-orbital advancements performed (0.6 versus 1.5 per patient; p = 0.023).Using early posterior vault distraction osteogenesis for patients with syndromic craniosynostosis significantly reduces the average number of fronto-orbital advancement procedures in the first 5 years of life, delays initial fronto-orbital advancement, and is likely to reduce the total number of major craniofacial procedures.Therapeutic, III.

The h-index is an objective measure of an investigator's scholarly impact. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the association between scholarly impact, as measured by the h-index, and the procurement of National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant funding among academic plastic surgeons.This was a case-control study of NIH-funded plastic surgery faculty identified on the RePORTER database. Non-NIH-funded faculty from the top 10 NIH-funded programs served as a control group. The mean h-index was calculated from Scopus (Elsevier, London, United Kingdom) and compared by funding status, academic rank, and terminal degree(s). The relationship between h-index and career NIH funding was elucidated via Spearman's correlation coefficient.NIH-funded faculty had higher h-indices than nonNIH-funded faculty (23.9 versus 9.9, p0.001), an effect that persisted when controlling for academic rank. Higher rank correlated with higher h-indices and predicted greater NIH funding (p0.05). The h-index did not vary by terminal degree (p0.05), but investigators with a master's degree exhibited a trend toward greater NIH funding. Higher h-indices correlated with greater NIH funding (r = 0.481, p0.001).A strong relationship exists between scholarly impact and the procurement of NIH funding. Faculty with greater funding had greater scholarly impact, as measured by the h-index, which suggests that this tool may have utility during the NIH grant application process.