Search

A possible solution to stability problems is to genetically reduce the content of linolenic acid in soybean seed. RG10 is a low linolenic acid line (< 25 g/kg) produced by ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) treatment of the low linolenic acid EMS mutant line C1640. The objective of this study was to determine the molecular basis of the low linolenic acid trait in RG10. Sequence analyses of mutant RG10 and wild-type OX948 ω-fatty acid desaturase (Fad3) genes showed that the low level of linolenic acid in RG10 is likely a result of mutations in two Fad3 genes. A mutation in the Fad3A gene introduces a stop codon in exon 6 that would prematurely terminate translation and a second mutation in the 5' splice site of intron 5 of the Fad3B gene may result in abnormal mRNA splicing products. Both mutations would result in a non-functional enzyme. Molecular markers developed for these mutations should simplify and accelerate introgression of the RG10-based low linolenic acid trait into elite soybean cultivars.

The possibility of using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers previously mapped in the common bean PC50/XANI59 population to select for resistance to common bacterial blight (CBB) in different populations was examined. Two out of 02 selected RAPD markers were polymorphic in HR56 and W0633d, the parental lines used in this experiment. Cosegregation analysis of the two polymorphic markers and disease reaction in a recombinant inbred (RI) population derived from HR67/W1744d confirmed that one of the two RAPD markers, BC420900, was significantly associated with a major quantitative trait locus-conditioning resistance to CBB in HR67. This locus accounted for approximately 51) of the phenotypic variation. The RAPD marker was transformed into a sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) marker and used for selection in a different population derived from ‘Envoy’/HR67. Prediction for resistance to CBB with the BC420.990 SCAR marker was 94.2% accurate in this population. A comparison between marker-assisted selection (MAS) and conventional greenhouse screening showed that the cost of MAS is about one-third less than that of the greenhouse test.