Search

Acromegaly is associated with an enhanced mortality, with cardiovascular and respiratory complications representing not only the most frequent comorbidities but also two of the main causes of deaths, whereas a minor role is played by metabolic complications, and particularly diabetes mellitus. The most prevalent cardiovascular complications of acromegaly include a cardiomyopathy, characterized by cardiac hypertrophy and diastolic and systolic dysfunction together with arterial hypertension, cardiac rhythm disorders and valve diseases, as well as vascular endothelial dysfunction. Biochemical control of acromegaly significantly improves cardiovascular disease, albeit completely recovering to normal mainly in young patients with short disease duration. Respiratory complications, represented mainly by sleep-breathing disorders, particularly sleep apnea, and respiratory insufficiency, frequently occur at the early stage of the disease and, although their severity decreases with disease control, this improvement does not often change the indication for a specific therapy directed to improve respiratory function. Metabolic complications, including glucose and lipid disorders, are variably reported in acromegaly. Treatments of acromegaly may influence glucose metabolism, and the presence of diabetes mellitus in acromegaly may affect the choice of treatments, so that glucose homeostasis is worth being monitored during the entire course of the disease. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment of acromegaly, aimed at obtaining a strict control of hormone excess, are the best strategy to limit the development or reverse the complications and prevent the premature mortality.

According to Pituitary and Endocrine Society recommendations, cabergoline (CAB) therapy can be discontinued after 2 years in hyperprolactinemic patients who fit certain criteria. Previous studies found recurrence rates ranging between 26 and 69 %. Whether CAB therapy can be successfully discontinued after one unsuccessful withdrawal is unknown.We conducted a pilot prospective two-center study on a second attempt of CAB withdrawal. Inclusion criteria were: (1) recurrence of hyperprolactinemia after first withdrawal; (2) additional CAB therapy for at least 2 years; (3) normal serum prolactin; (4) CAB dose ≤ 1 mg/week. Prolactin level was monitored after discontinuing therapy. Median follow up for patients who are still in remission was 42 months (range = 24-60).A total of 17 patients were recruited. Mean age was 41.0 ± 17.3 years. 65 % were female. Initial tumors were microadenoma in 64.7 %, and macroadenoma in 35.3 %. The average weekly CAB dose at second withdrawal was 0.38 ± 0.20 mg (median = 0.25, range = 0.175-1). Eleven of 17 patients (64.7 %) recurred. Median time to recurrence was 6 months. The incidence of recurrence was 44 events per 100 person-years. The estimated cumulative hazard of recurrence was 40 and 82 % at 6 and 12 months respectively. The probability to be recurrence-free at 6 and 12 months was 65 and 41 %, respectively.Second attempt of CAB withdrawal after 2 additional years of therapy may be successful in some patients. A second withdrawal can be attempted with close monitoring of prolactin level. In this study, we could not identify any predictor of recurrence. Most of the recurrences occurred within the first 12 months after withdrawal.

Context The somatostatin analogues octreotide LAR and lanreotide Autogel have been evaluated for the treatment of acromegaly in numerous clinical trials, with considerable heterogeneity in reported biochemical response rates. This review examines and attempts to account for these differences in response rates reported in the literature. Evidence acquisition PubMed was searched for English-language studies of a minimum duration of 24 weeks that evaluated ≥10 patients with acromegaly treated with octreotide LAR or lanreotide Autogel from 1990 to March 2015 and reported GH and/or IGF-1 data as the primary objective of the study. Evidence synthesis Of the 190 clinical trials found, 18 octreotide LAR and 15 lanreotide Autogel studies fulfilled the criteria for analysis. It is evident from the protocols of these studies that multiple factors are capable of impacting on reported response rates. Prospective studies reporting an intention-to-treat analysis that evaluated medically naïve patients and used the composite endpoint of both GH and IGF-1 control were associated with lower response rates. The use of non-composite biochemical control endpoints, heterogeneous patient populations, analyses that exclude treatment non-responders, assay variability and prior responsiveness to medical therapy are just a few of the factors identified that likely contribute to higher success rates. Conclusions The wide range of reported response rates with somatostatin analogues may be confusing and could lead to misinterpretation by both the patient and the physician in certain situations. Understanding the factors that potentially drive the variation in response rates should allow clinicians to better gauge treatment expectations in specific patients.

To evaluate the metabolic effects of first-line somatostatin analogues or surgery in acromegaly. Retrospective, comparative, 12-month follow-up. Two hundred and thirty one patients (123 men, age 47.32 ± 14.63 years) with active acromegaly, first line treatments were somatostatin analogues in 151 (65.4%) and surgery in 80 (34.6%). Metabolic syndrome (MS) parameters, glucose, insulin and GH during oral glucose tolerance test, stimulated insulin sensitivity by insulin sensitivity index (ISI Matsuda), early and total insulin-secretion rate by insulinogenic index and AUC(INS), visceral adiposity function, expressed by visceral adipose index (VAI). Somatostatin analogues treatment improved all MS parameters and significantly reduced fasting glucose (P < 0.001), HbA1c (P = 0.014) and the prevalence of DM (P = 0.003) when disease control was achieved. Both somatostatin analogues and surgery improved ISI Matsuda (P < 0.001) and reduced AUC(INS) (P < 0.001) and VAI (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Only in controlled somatostatin analogues-treated patients a significant reduction in insulinogenic index (P = 0.010) was observed. ISI Matsuda showed a significant independent correlation with IGF-1 levels (β = -0.258; P = 0.001) and VAI score (β = -0.430; P < 0.001). VAI was independently correlated with IGF-1 (β = 0.183; P = 0.004). Both somatostatin analogues and surgery can safely be used as first-line therapy in acromegaly, without any untoward effects on glucose tolerance. The control of acromegaly is the main determinant of beneficial effects on general features of insulin sensitivity. VAI could represent an additional link between disease control and insulin sensitivity.

Introduction In nearly all cases, acromegaly is caused by excess GH from a pituitary adenoma, resulting in elevated circulating levels of GH and, subsequently, IGF-1. Treatment goals are to eliminate morbidity and restore the increased mortality to normal rates. Therapeutic strategies aim to minimize tumor mass and normalize GH and IGF-1 levels. Somatostatin analogues are the medical treatment of choice in acromegaly, as first-line or post-surgical therapy, and have proven efficacy in pituitary tumor volume reduction (TVR). Methods Here we review the effects of somatostatin analogue therapy on pituitary tumor volume in patients with acromegaly. Results TVR with somatostatin analogues may be mediated by direct anti-proliferative effects via activation of somatostatin receptors, or by indirect effects, such as angiogenesis inhibition, and is more pronounced when they are administered as first-line therapy. Various studies of first-line treatment with octreotide LAR have shown significant TVR in ≥73 % of patients. First-line treatment with lanreotide Autogel has shown evidence of TVR, although more studies are needed. In a recent randomized, double-blind, 12-month trial in 358 medical-treatment-naïve acromegaly patients, significant TVR was achieved by 81 % of patients administered pasireotide LAR and 77 % administered octreotide LAR. Pre-operative somatostatin analogue therapy may also induce TVR and improve post-operative disease control compared with surgery alone. TVR is progressive with prolonged treatment, and decreased IGF-1 levels may be its best predictor, followed by age and degree of GH decrease. However, TVR does not always correlate with degree of biochemical control. Conclusion Somatostatin analogues (first- or second-line treatment) are the mainstay of medical therapy and, as first-line medical therapy, are associated with significant pituitary TVR in most patients.