Search

Fungal canker pathogens of almond initiate infection in trees primarily through pruning wounds. Biological control agents (BCAs) have the potential to provide long-term protection of pruning wounds by colonizing the wound surfaces and underlying tissues. Laboratory and field tests were performed to assess the efficacy of various commercial and experimental BCAs as wound protectants against almond canker pathogens. Four Trichoderma-based BCAs were evaluated using detached almond stems in the laboratory against the canker pathogens Cytospora plurivora, Eutypa lata, Neofusicoccum parvum, and Neoscytalidium dimidiatum. Results indicated that Trichoderma atroviride SC1 and T. paratroviride RTFT014 significantly reduced infections by all four pathogens. The abilities of these four BCAs to protect almond pruning wounds against E. lata and N. parvum were further evaluated in field trials using two almond cultivars and during two consecutive years. Both T. atroviride SC 1 and T. paratroviride RTFT014 protected almond pruning wounds against E. lata and N. parvum as efficiently as thiophanate-methyl, the recommended fungicide for treatment of almond pruning wounds. Comparisons of different application timings of BCA in relation to pathogen inoculation revealed a significant improvement in wound protection when inoculations were conducted 7 days versus 24 h post-BCA application for N. parvum, but not for E. lata. T. atroviride SC 1 and T. paratroviride RTFT014 are promising candidates for the preventive protection of almond pruning wounds and for inclusion in integrated pest management programs and organic almond production systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Trunk and scaffold canker diseases (TSCDs) of almond cause significant yield and tree losses and reduce the lifespan of orchards. In California, several pathogens cause TSCDs, including Botryosphaeriaceae, Ceratocystis destructans, Eutypa lata, Collophorina hispanica, Pallidophorina paarla, Cytospora, Diaporthe, and Phytophthora spp. Field diagnosis of TSCDs is challenging because symptom delineation among the diseases is not clear. Accurate diagnosis of the causal species requires detailed examination of symptoms and subsequent isolation on medium and identification using morphological criteria and subsequent confirmation using molecular tools. The process is time-consuming and difficult, particularly as morphological characteristics are variable and overlap among species. To facilitate diagnosis of TSCD, we developed PCR assays using 23 species-specific primers designed by exploiting sequence differences in the translation elongation factor, ß-tubulin, or internal transcribed spacer gene. Using genomic DNA from pure cultures of each fungal and oomycete species, each primer pair successfully amplified a single DNA fragment from the target pathogen but not from selected nontarget pathogens or common endophytes. Although 10-fold serial dilution of fungal DNA extracted from either pure cultures or infected wood samples detected as little as 0.1 pg of DNA sample, consistent detection required 10 ng of pathogen DNA from mycelial samples or from wood chips or drill shavings from artificially or naturally infected almond wood samples with visible symptoms. The new PCR assay represents an improved tool for diagnostic laboratories and will be critical to implement effective disease surveillance and control measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]