Search

Background and Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the 3-meter backward walk test (3MBWT) in individuals with Parkinson Disease (PD) to determine the following: (1) concurrent validity with other gait velocity measures and (2) interrater and intrarater reliability of in-person and video assessment. Methods: A convenience sample of 25 people with PD participated. Forward gait velocity was measured using a computerized walkway (Zeno Walkway System), the 10-meter walk test (10MWT), and 4-meter walk test (4MWT). Backward gait velocity was measured using the 3MBWT. Concurrent validity was assessed using Pearson’s correlations. Reliability was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC(2,1)). Results: All relationships between the 3MBWT and gait outcome measures were significant. The 3MBWT demonstrated strong correlations with the 4MWT dual task (r = .795, p=<.001) and moderate correlations with 4MWT comfortable walking speed (r = .658, p < .001), 4MWT fast walking speed (r = .601,p=.002), 10MWT comfortable walking speed (r = .512, p = .009), and 10MWT dual task (r = .535, p = .006). A low yet significant correlation was noted with the 10MWT fast walking speed (r = .398, p = .049). Association between the 3MBWT and the Zeno Walkway System revealed moderate correlations. All reliability tests were significant at p < .001. Interrater reliability ICC(2,1) values were very high for 3MBWT (ICC(2,1) = 0.93, [0.83–0.91]). Intrarater reliability was also very high (ICC(2,1) = 0.96 [0.90–0.98]). Conclusion: The 3MBWT demonstrates validity and reliability as a tool for assessing gait speed in the posterior direction in people with PD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Backward walking (BW) is an important gait adaptation and BW speed may be an important indicator of walking function and fall risk. However, the measurement characteristics of a standardized assessment of BW post-stroke have not been fully established. To determine intra- and interrater reliability, concurrent validity and minimal detectable change (MDC) scores for the 3-Meter Backward Walk Test (3MBWT) post-stroke. Thirty-four individuals with subacute and 29 individuals with chronic stroke participated. Two trials of comfortable BW was measured over a total distance of 5-meters, while speed was calculated during the middle 3-meters of the walking distance. Intra and interrater reliability were determined by comparing the two trials from one rater and simultaneous assessment of two raters, respectively. Two additional trials were performed and BW speed was calculated using 3MBWT and an instrumented walkway to determine concurrent validity. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) estimated reliability and validity. The MDC was calculated from the standard error of measurement. Excellent ICC values were obtained for the 3MBWT in the subacute (interrater: ICC2,1 = 0.99; intrarater: ICC2,1 = 0.96; validity: ICC2,1 = 0.96) and chronic (interrater: ICC2,1 = 0.99; intrarater: ICC2,1 = 0.94; validity: ICC2,1 = 0.97) groups. The MDC was 0.07 m/s (subacute) and 0.11 m/s (chronic). Establishment of the 3MBWT as a reliable and valid measure in assessing BW speed is an important addition to the assessment toolbox for rehabilitation post-stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The present study aimed to assess proprioception of the knee to evaluate the effectiveness of backward walking for rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: Patients (n = 52) who underwent ACL reconstruction in a single knee divided randomly into four experimental groups (A-D) and a control group, who all practiced a systematic rehabilitation exercise program. The patients in the experimental groups underwent backward walking using different treadmill angles: group A (0°), B (5°), C (10°) and D (15°). The whole training period comprised 4 weeks. Outcomes for the joint were assessed using the Angle Reproduction Test (ART) and Passive Motion Perception Test (PMPT). Results: Compared with the pre-training recorded parameters, significant differences were found in the ART and PMPT scores among all training groups and between the control group and the training groups. When the four training groups were compared with each other, there was no difference in the ART results between groups A and B, but significant differences were found between group A and groups C and D. Conclusion: Backward walking as a rehabilitation technique improved knee proprioception after ACL reconstruction. Increasing the angle of the treadmill during exercise improved the efficacy of rehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Purpose: Individuals with incomplete spinal cord injuries (ISCIs) commonly face persistent gait impairments. Backward walking training may be a useful rehabilitation approach, providing novel gait and balance challenges. However, little is known about the effects of this approach for individuals with ISCIs. The purpose of this case report was to describe the effects of backward walking training on strength, balance, and upright mobility in an individual with chronic ISCI. Methods: A 28-year-old female, 11-years post ISCI (C4, AIS D) completed 18-sessions of backward walking training on a treadmill with partial body-weight support and overground. Training emphasized stepping practice, speed, and kinematics. Outcome measures included: Lower Extremity Motor Score, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Sensory Organization Test (SOT), 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), 3-meter backward walking test, Timed Up and Go (TUG), and Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Results: Strength did not change. Improved balance was evident based on BBS (20 to 37/56) and SOT scores (27 to 40/100). Upright mobility improved based on TUG times (57 to 32.7 s), increased 10MWT speed (0.23 to 0.31 m/s), and backward gait speed (0.07 to 0.12 m/s). Additionally, self-reported balance confidence (ABC Scale) increased from 36.9% to 49.6%. Conclusions: The results suggest that backward walking may be a beneficial rehabilitation approach; examination of the clinical efficacy is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose/Hypothesis: Body weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT) is a task-specific intervention that promotes functional locomotion. There is no research evaluating the effect of backward walking (BW) using BWSTT in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). The purpose of this single subject design was to examine the differences between forward walking (FW) and BW training using BWSTT in an individual with quadriparesis. Methods: The participant was a 57-year-old male with incomplete C3-C6 SCI. An ABABAB design (A = BW; B = FW; each phase = 3 weeks of biweekly sessions) was utilized. Outcome measures included: gait parameters; a timed 4-meter walk; the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test (STST); tandem stance time; and 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Data was analyzed with split level method of trend estimation. Results: Improvements in gait parameters, on the timed 4-meter walk, 6MWT, tandem balance and aerobic endurance were similar with FW and BW training. The only difference between FW and BW training was that BW training resulted in greater improvements in the STST. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that in this individual backward walking training was advantageous, resulting in improved ability to perform the 5-repetition STST. It is suspected that these changes can be attributed to the differences in muscle activation and task difficulty between FW and BW. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]