10 results on '"Chan, Timothy C. Y."'
Search Results
2. Optimal margin and edge-enhanced intensity maps in the presence of motion and uncertainty
- Author
-
Chan, Timothy C Y, primary, Tsitsiklis, John N, additional, and Bortfeld, Thomas, additional
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Experimental evaluation of a robust optimization method for IMRT of moving targets
- Author
-
Vrančić, Christian, primary, Trofimov, Alexei, additional, Chan, Timothy C Y, additional, Sharp, Gregory C, additional, and Bortfeld, Thomas, additional
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Accounting for range uncertainties in the optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy
- Author
-
Unkelbach, Jan, primary, Chan, Timothy C Y, additional, and Bortfeld, Thomas, additional
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. A robust approach to IMRT optimization
- Author
-
Chan, Timothy C Y, primary, Bortfeld, Thomas, additional, and Tsitsiklis, John N, additional
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. OpenKBP-Opt: an international and reproducible evaluation of 76 knowledge-based planning pipelines.
- Author
-
Babier A, Mahmood R, Zhang B, Alves VGL, Barragán-Montero AM, Beaudry J, Cardenas CE, Chang Y, Chen Z, Chun J, Diaz K, David Eraso H, Faustmann E, Gaj S, Gay S, Gronberg M, Guo B, He J, Heilemann G, Hira S, Huang Y, Ji F, Jiang D, Carlo Jimenez Giraldo J, Lee H, Lian J, Liu S, Liu KC, Marrugo J, Miki K, Nakamura K, Netherton T, Nguyen D, Nourzadeh H, Osman AFI, Peng Z, Darío Quinto Muñoz J, Ramsl C, Joo Rhee D, David Rodriguez J, Shan H, Siebers JV, Soomro MH, Sun K, Usuga Hoyos A, Valderrama C, Verbeek R, Wang E, Willems S, Wu Q, Xu X, Yang S, Yuan L, Zhu S, Zimmermann L, Moore KL, Purdie TG, McNiven AL, and Chan TCY
- Subjects
- Humans, Knowledge Bases, Radiotherapy Dosage, Reproducibility of Results, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods, Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated methods
- Abstract
Objective. To establish an open framework for developing plan optimization models for knowledge-based planning (KBP). Approach. Our framework includes radiotherapy treatment data (i.e. reference plans) for 100 patients with head-and-neck cancer who were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. That data also includes high-quality dose predictions from 19 KBP models that were developed by different research groups using out-of-sample data during the OpenKBP Grand Challenge. The dose predictions were input to four fluence-based dose mimicking models to form 76 unique KBP pipelines that generated 7600 plans (76 pipelines × 100 patients). The predictions and KBP-generated plans were compared to the reference plans via: the dose score, which is the average mean absolute voxel-by-voxel difference in dose; the deviation in dose-volume histogram (DVH) points; and the frequency of clinical planning criteria satisfaction. We also performed a theoretical investigation to justify our dose mimicking models. Main results. The range in rank order correlation of the dose score between predictions and their KBP pipelines was 0.50-0.62, which indicates that the quality of the predictions was generally positively correlated with the quality of the plans. Additionally, compared to the input predictions, the KBP-generated plans performed significantly better ( P < 0.05; one-sided Wilcoxon test) on 18 of 23 DVH points. Similarly, each optimization model generated plans that satisfied a higher percentage of criteria than the reference plans, which satisfied 3.5% more criteria than the set of all dose predictions. Lastly, our theoretical investigation demonstrated that the dose mimicking models generated plans that are also optimal for an inverse planning model. Significance. This was the largest international effort to date for evaluating the combination of KBP prediction and optimization models. We found that the best performing models significantly outperformed the reference dose and dose predictions. In the interest of reproducibility, our data and code is freely available., (Creative Commons Attribution license.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Robust radiotherapy planning.
- Author
-
Unkelbach J, Alber M, Bangert M, Bokrantz R, Chan TCY, Deasy JO, Fredriksson A, Gorissen BL, van Herk M, Liu W, Mahmoudzadeh H, Nohadani O, Siebers JV, Witte M, and Xu H
- Subjects
- Humans, Motion, Radiotherapy Dosage, Proton Therapy methods, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods, Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated methods
- Abstract
Motion and uncertainty in radiotherapy is traditionally handled via margins. The clinical target volume (CTV) is expanded to a larger planning target volume (PTV), which is irradiated to the prescribed dose. However, the PTV concept has several limitations, especially in proton therapy. Therefore, robust and probabilistic optimization methods have been developed that directly incorporate motion and uncertainty into treatment plan optimization for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Thereby, the explicit definition of a PTV becomes obsolete and treatment plan optimization is directly based on the CTV. Initial work focused on random and systematic setup errors in IMRT. Later, inter-fraction prostate motion and intra-fraction lung motion became a research focus. Over the past ten years, IMPT has emerged as a new application for robust planning methods. In proton therapy, range or setup errors may lead to dose degradation and misalignment of dose contributions from different beams - a problem that cannot generally be addressed by margins. Therefore, IMPT has led to the first implementations of robust planning methods in commercial planning systems, making these methods available for clinical use. This paper first summarizes the limitations of the PTV concept. Subsequently, robust optimization methods are introduced and their applications in IMRT and IMPT planning are reviewed.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. A small number of objective function weight vectors is sufficient for automated treatment planning in prostate cancer.
- Author
-
Goli A, Boutilier JJ, Craig T, Sharpe MB, and Chan TCY
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Radiotherapy Dosage, Prostatic Neoplasms radiotherapy, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods, Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated methods
- Abstract
Current practice for treatment planning optimization can be both inefficient and time consuming. In this paper, we propose an automated planning methodology that aims to combine both explorative and prescriptive approaches for improving the efficiency and the quality of the treatment planning process. Given a treatment plan, our explorative approach explores trade-offs between different objectives and finds an acceptable region for objective function weights via inverse optimization. Intuitively, the shape and size of these regions describe how 'sensitive' a patient is to perturbations in objective function weights. We then develop an integer programming-based prescriptive approach that exploits the information encoded by these regions to find a set of five representative objective function weight vectors such that for each patient there exists at least one representative weight vector that can produce a high quality treatment plan. Using 315 patients from Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, we show that the produced treatment plans are comparable and, for [Formula: see text] of cases, improve upon the inversely optimized plans that are generated from the historical clinical treatment plans.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Inverse optimization of objective function weights for treatment planning using clinical dose-volume histograms.
- Author
-
Babier A, Boutilier JJ, Sharpe MB, McNiven AL, and Chan TCY
- Subjects
- Canada, Humans, Radiotherapy Dosage, Organs at Risk radiation effects, Oropharyngeal Neoplasms radiotherapy, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted standards, Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated methods
- Abstract
We developed and evaluated a novel inverse optimization (IO) model to estimate objective function weights from clinical dose-volume histograms (DVHs). These weights were used to solve a treatment planning problem to generate 'inverse plans' that had similar DVHs to the original clinical DVHs. Our methodology was applied to 217 clinical head and neck cancer treatment plans that were previously delivered at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Canada. Inverse plan DVHs were compared to the clinical DVHs using objective function values, dose-volume differences, and frequency of clinical planning criteria satisfaction. Median differences between the clinical and inverse DVHs were within 1.1 Gy. For most structures, the difference in clinical planning criteria satisfaction between the clinical and inverse plans was at most 1.4%. For structures where the two plans differed by more than 1.4% in planning criteria satisfaction, the difference in average criterion violation was less than 0.5 Gy. Overall, the inverse plans were very similar to the clinical plans. Compared with a previous inverse optimization method from the literature, our new inverse plans typically satisfied the same or more clinical criteria, and had consistently lower fluence heterogeneity. Overall, this paper demonstrates that DVHs, which are essentially summary statistics, provide sufficient information to estimate objective function weights that result in high quality treatment plans. However, as with any summary statistic that compresses three-dimensional dose information, care must be taken to avoid generating plans with undesirable features such as hotspots; our computational results suggest that such undesirable spatial features were uncommon. Our IO-based approach can be integrated into the current clinical planning paradigm to better initialize the planning process and improve planning efficiency. It could also be embedded in a knowledge-based planning or adaptive radiation therapy framework to automatically generate a new plan given a predicted or updated target DVH, respectively.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Optimal margin and edge-enhanced intensity maps in the presence of motion and uncertainty.
- Author
-
Chan TC, Tsitsiklis JN, and Bortfeld T
- Subjects
- Algorithms, Humans, Neoplasms pathology, Normal Distribution, Radiotherapy Dosage, Models, Biological, Motion, Neoplasms radiotherapy, Radiotherapy methods, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods, Uncertainty
- Abstract
In radiation therapy, intensity maps involving margins have long been used to counteract the effects of dose blurring arising from motion. More recently, intensity maps with increased intensity near the edge of the tumour (edge enhancements) have been studied to evaluate their ability to offset similar effects that affect tumour coverage. In this paper, we present a mathematical methodology to derive margin and edge-enhanced intensity maps that aim to provide tumour coverage while delivering minimum total dose. We show that if the tumour is at most about twice as large as the standard deviation of the blurring distribution, the optimal intensity map is a pure scaling increase of the static intensity map without any margins or edge enhancements. Otherwise, if the tumour size is roughly twice (or more) the standard deviation of motion, then margins and edge enhancements are preferred, and we present formulae to calculate the exact dimensions of these intensity maps. Furthermore, we extend our analysis to include scenarios where the parameters of the motion distribution are not known with certainty, but rather can take any value in some range. In these cases, we derive a similar threshold to determine the structure of an optimal margin intensity map.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.