1. Validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron Collider
- Author
-
Roderik Bruce, Luigi Salvatore Esposito, T. Baer, A. Lechner, Bernhard Auchmann, F. Cerutti, Belen Salvachua, Arnaud Ferrari, Mariusz Sapinski, Alessio Mereghetti, C. Bahamonde Castro, Michaela Schaumann, E. Skordis, Nikhil Vittal Shetty, F. Pietropaolo, Vasilis Vlachoudis, Stefano Redaelli, and John Jowett
- Subjects
Nuclear and High Energy Physics ,Materials science ,Large Hadron Collider ,Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous) ,Proton ,Surfaces and Interfaces ,Accelerators and Storage Rings ,Nuclear physics ,Physics::Accelerator Physics ,lcsh:QC770-798 ,lcsh:Nuclear and particle physics. Atomic energy. Radioactivity ,Heavy ion ,Nuclear Experiment ,Deposition (chemistry) ,Energy (signal processing) - Abstract
Monte Carlo shower simulations are essential for understanding and predicting the consequences of beam losses in high-energy proton and ion colliders. Shower simulations are routinely used at CERN for estimating the beam-induced energy deposition, radiation damage, and radioactivity in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Comparing these shower simulations against beam loss measurements is an important prerequisite for assessing the predictive ability of model calculations. This paper validates fluka simulation predictions of beam loss monitor (BLM) signals against BLM measurements from proton fills at 3.5 and 4 TeV and $^{208}$Pb$^{82+}$ ion fills at 1.38A TeV. The paper addresses typical loss scenarios and loss mechanisms encountered in LHC operation, including proton collisions with dust particles liberated into the beams, halo impact on collimators in the betatron cleaning insertion, proton-proton collisions in the interaction points, and dispersive losses due to bound-free pair production in heavy ion collisions. Model predictions and measured signals generally match within a few tens of percent, although systematic differences were found to be as high as a factor of 3 for some regions and source terms.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF