Search

Summary Background PDT represents a very localized and non-mutagen antitumoral treatment using a photosensitive molecule (porphyrin family) light activated. The first way of cell damage is a direct one, active on the very site where ROSs have been produced. The second one is indirect by activating and transmitting the processes of cellular death signaling. In order to seek for a better characterization of the photo-biology involved in in vivo PDT and to better understand the differences on the treatment outcome, we have used three different human retinoblastomas xenografted on mice. Methods Mice were treated according to the double targeting protocol exposed in a previous paper. One i.v. dose (0.6 mg/kg) of PS was followed by a second dose, separated by a 3 h interval (double targeting PDT). As a consequence both cancer cells and blood vessels were targeted. The treatment was repeated two times, at 4 days interval. Results First of all, sodium MRI revealed qualitative differences in the sodium average content of the three retinoblastoma lines before treatment. After the PDT treatments the tumor responses were different between the lines as revealed by sodium MRI and later on by histology. Conclusions We have put into evidence that PDT is accompanied by a bystander effect that may propagate the cellular death triggered by the initial photoreaction. This effect is highly dependent on the cellular density of the tissue; therefore this factor is to be taken into account in clinical PDT protocols.

Summary Background Previous in vivo studies on photodynamic therapy (PDT)-treated, high cellular density tumors showed evidences of a bystander effect accompanying the therapy, cellular death continuing beyond the limits of the photochemical reactions in time and space. This process is generated by the initially damaged cells on the light pathway. The aim of this study was to determine if the bystander effect may be induced as well in colorectal xenografted tumors (less compact structure) and if the cellular signaling depends primarily on cellular proximity or not. Methods The photosensitizer was a glycoconjugated, meso substituted porphyrin derivative synthesized at Institut Curie. The longitudinal follow-up of the tumors was carried out by 23Na/1H MRI, ideal imaging modality for mapping the extracellular compartment. Two regimens were followed in order to target either blood vessels alone or blood vessels and cancer cells simultaneously. Results The antivascular PDT did not succeed to arrest the tumors growth at the end of the follow-up. For double targeting PDT, we managed to stop the tumoral evolution. Sodium MRI evidenced a bystander effect. Conclusion The results obtained showed that the bystander effect is more difficult to induce for the type of colorectal tumors used in this work. It needs a double treatment, 4 days apart, in order to be promoted.