Search

The article focuses on Hermann Cohen's conception of Neo-Kantianism. The author argues that Cohen's interpretation of Kant's goal in pursuing epistemology is ambiguous and his idea seems that Kant claims the accomplishment of revolution of the way of thinking. The author believes that Cohen is not in favor of Kant's reading on space and substance because of psychologism or logicism. He also explains the aspects when reflecting on the possibility of cognition. Furthermore, the author adds that Cohen is not aware about Kant as critic of dogmatic physics.