Search

Purpose: We investigated whether short term infusion of propofol, a highly lipophilic agonist at GABAA receptors, which is in widespread clinical use as anesthetic and sedative, affects passive blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability in vivo. Methods: Mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of ketamine/xylazine followed by a continuous IV infusion of propofol in lipid emulsion through a tail vein catheter. Control groups received ketamine/xylazine anesthesia and an infusion of Intralipid, or ketamine/xylazine anesthesia only. [13C12]sucrose as a permeability marker was injected as IV bolus 15 min after start of the infusions. Brain uptake clearance, Kin, of sucrose was calculated from the brain concentrations at 30 min and the area under the plasma-concentration time curve. We also measured the plasma and brain concentration of propofol at the terminal time point. Results: The Kin value for propofol-infused mice was significantly higher, by a factor of 1.55 and 1.87, compared to the Intralipid infusion and the ketamine/xylazine groups, respectively, while the control groups were not significantly different. No difference was seen in the expression levels of tight junction proteins in brain across all groups. The propofol plasma concentration at the end of infusion (10.7 µM) matched the clinically relevant range of blood concentrations reported in humans, while concentration in brain was 2.5-fold higher than plasma. Conclusions: Propofol at clinical plasma concentrations acutely increases BBB permeability, extending our previous results with volatile anesthetics to a lipophilic injectable agent. This prompts further exploration, potentially refining clinical practices and ensuring safety, especially during extended propofol infusion schemes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intraperitoneal (IP) route of drug administration in laboratory animals is a common practice in many in vivo studies of disease models. While this route is an easy to master, quick, suitable for chronic treatments and with low impact of stress on laboratory rodents, there is a common concern that it may not be an acceptable route for drug administration in experimental studies. The latter is likely due to sparsity of information regarding pharmacokinetics of pharmacological agents and the mechanisms through which agents get systemic exposure after IP administration. In this review, we summarize the main mechanisms involved in bioavailability of IP administered drugs and provide examples of pharmacokinetic profiles for small and large molecules in comparison to other routes of administration. We conclude with a notion that IP administration of drugs in experimental studies involving rodents is a justifiable route for pharmacological and proof-of-concept studies where the goal is to evaluate the effect(s) of target engagement rather than properties of a drug formulation and/or its pharmacokinetics for clinical translation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]