Search

Purpose: Despite no broad, direct evidence in humans, there is a potential concern that surfactants alter active or passive drug intestinal permeation to modulate oral drug absorption. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the surfactant polysorbate 80 on active and passive intestinal drug absorption in humans. Methods: The human (n = 12) pharmacokinetics (PK) of three probe substrates of intestinal absorption, valacyclovir, chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), and enalaprilat, were assessed. Endogenous bile acid levels were assessed as a secondary measure of transporter and microbiota impact. Results: Polysorbate 80 did not inhibit peptide transporter 1 (PepT1)- or apical sodium bile acid transporter (ASBT)-mediated PK of valacyclovir and CDCA, respectively. Polysorbate 80 did not increase enalaprilat absorption. Modest increases in unconjugated secondary bile acid Cmax ratios suggest a potential alteration of the in vivo intestinal microbiota by polysorbate 80. Conclusions: Polysorbate 80 did not alter intestinal membrane fluidity or cause intestinal membrane disruption. This finding supports regulatory relief of excipient restrictions for Biopharmaceutics Classification System-based biowaivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview focusing on the extent of lymphatic transport of drugs following intestinal absorption and to summarize available data on the impact of molecular weight, lipophilicity, formulation and prandial state. Methods: Literature was searched for in vivo studies quantifying extent of lymphatic transport of drugs after enteral dosing. Pharmacokinetic data were extracted and summarized. Influence of molecular weight, log P, formulation and prandial state was analyzed using relative bioavailability via lymph (FRL) as the parameter for comparison. The methods and animal models used in the studies were also summarized. Results: Pharmacokinetic data on lymphatic transport were available for 103 drugs. Significantly higher FRL [median (IQR)] was observed in advanced lipid based formulations [54.4% (52.0)] and oil solutions [38.9% (60.8)] compared to simple formulations [2.0% (27.1)], p < 0.0001 and p = 0.004, respectively. Advanced lipid based formulations also provided substantial FRL in drugs with log P < 5, which was not observed in simple formulations and oil solutions. No relation was found between FRL and molecular weight. There were 10 distinct methods used for in vivo testing of lymphatic transport after intestinal absorption so far. Conclusion: Advanced lipid based formulations provide superior ability to increase lymphatic absorption in drugs of various molecular weights and in drugs with moderate to low lipophilicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]