1. Effect of biocompatible peritoneal dialysis solution on residual renal function: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
- Author
-
Seo EY, An SH, Cho JH, Suh HS, Park SH, Gwak H, Kim YL, and Ha H
- Subjects
- Biocompatible Materials, Dialysis Solutions administration & dosage, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic diagnosis, Kidney Function Tests, Male, Peritoneal Dialysis adverse effects, Peritoneal Dialysis methods, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Republic of Korea, Risk Assessment, Severity of Illness Index, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Cause of Death, Dialysis Solutions pharmacology, Kidney Failure, Chronic mortality, Kidney Failure, Chronic therapy, Peritoneal Dialysis mortality
- Abstract
Introduction: Residual renal function (RRF) plays an important role in outcome of peritoneal dialysis (PD) including mortality. It is, therefore, important to provide a strategy for the preservation of RRF. The objective of this study was to evaluate relative protective effects of new glucose-based multicompartmental PD solution (PDS), which is well known to be more biocompatible than glucose-based conventional PDS, on RRF compared to conventional PDS by performing a systematic review (SR) of randomized controlled trials., Methods: We searched studies presented up to January 2014 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the COCHRANE library, and local databases. Three independent reviewers reviewed and extracted prespecified data from each study. The random effects model, a more conservative analysis model, was used to combine trials and to perform stratified analyses based on the duration of follow-up. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for risk of bias. Eleven articles with 1,034 patients were identified for the SR., Results: The heterogeneity of the studies under 12 months was very high, and the heterogeneity decreased substantially when we stratified studies by the duration of follow-up. The mean difference of the studies after 12 months was 0.46 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (95% confidence interval = 0.25 to + 0.67)., Conclusion: New PDS showed the effect to preserve and improve RRF for long-term use compared to conventional PDS, even though it did not show a significant difference to preserve RRF for short-term use., (Copyright © 2014 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.)
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF