Search

CONTEXT Acute neurologic dysfunction is common in critically ill children and contributes to outcomes and end of life decision-making. OBJECTIVE To develop consensus criteria for neurologic dysfunction in critically ill children by evaluating the evidence supporting such criteria and their association with outcomes. DATA SOURCES Electronic searches of PubMed and Embase were conducted from January 1992 to January 2020, by using a combination of medical subject heading terms and text words to define concepts of neurologic dysfunction, pediatric critical illness, and outcomes of interest. STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if the researchers evaluated critically ill children with neurologic injury, evaluated the performance characteristics of assessment and scoring tools to screen for neurologic dysfunction, and assessed outcomes related to mortality, functional status, organ-specific outcomes, or other patient-centered outcomes. Studies with an adult population or premature infants (≤36 weeks' gestational age), animal studies, reviews or commentaries, case series with sample size ≤10, and studies not published in English with an inability to determine eligibility criteria were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION Data were abstracted from each study meeting inclusion criteria into a standard data extraction form by task force members. DATA SYNTHESIS The systematic review supported the following criteria for neurologic dysfunction as any 1 of the following: (1) Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤8; (2) Glasgow Coma Scale motor score ≤4; (3) Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium score ≥9; or (4) electroencephalography revealing attenuation, suppression, or electrographic seizures. CONCLUSIONS We present consensus criteria for neurologic dysfunction in critically ill children.

Adenovirus infection is common in childhood and is generally associated with self-limited disease. Cidofovir, a viral DNA polymerase inhibitor, is used to treat adenovirus infection in select populations but is not often recommended for immunocompetent patients because of limited antiviral activity and nephrotoxicity. Here, we report a case of fulminant adenovirus infection associated with lymphopenia and multiple organ failure requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in a previously healthy child. After 1 week of supportive therapy, the patient had persistent organ failure and continued to have adenoviremia of >560 000 copies per mL. Weekly doses of cidofovir with concurrent probenecid for renal protection was initiated. Adenovirus blood load declined after the first cidofovir dose, becoming undetectable after 3 doses. The patient was successfully decannulated from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, extubated, and eventually discharged at his functional baseline without need for ongoing respiratory support. Lymphopenia improved after viremia resolved, and a subsequent immunologic workup revealed no evidence of primary immunodeficiency. The viral isolate was genotyped as adenovirus type 7. This case reveals the successful use of cidofovir for management of severe adenovirus infection in a previously healthy child. To date, there are no universally accepted recommendations for the use of cidofovir in this population. Further study is warranted to determine the potential role of cidofovir in treating severe adenovirus infections in immunocompetent children.