Search

Objectives: Our aim was to compare the effect of 2 treatment models on attendance and child weight status: a less intense guided self-help (GSH) program delivered in the primary care setting versus traditional family-based behavioral treatment (FBT) delivered in an academic center., Methods: We conducted a randomized clinical trial among 164 children between 5 and 13 years old with a BMI ≥85th percentile and their parents. The intervention group (GSH) received 14 individual sessions over 6 months, with 5.3 hours of treatment. The control group (FBT) received 20 group-based sessions over 6 months, with 20 hours of treatment. Main outcomes included proportion of sessions families attended and change in child BMI z-score (BMIz), percentage from the 95th BMI percentile, difference from the 95th BMI percentile at the end of treatment, and 6-month follow-up., Results: Mean age of children was 9.6 years, BMI z-score 2.1, 49% female, and >90% Latino. The odds of attending GSH compared to FBT was 2.2 (P < 0.01). Those assigned to GSH had a 67% reduced risk of attrition (hazard ratio = 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.50, P < .001). Intent-to-treat analysis showed no between-group differences in change in BMIz and percentage from the 95th BMI percentile over time. Combined, there was a significant reduction in BMIz from baseline to posttreatment (β = -0.07 (0.01), P < .01, d: 0.60) and a slight increase from posttreatment to follow-up (β = 0.007 (0.13), P = .56)., Conclusions: This study provides support for a novel, less intense GSH model of obesity treatment, which can be implemented in the primary care setting. Future studies should examine effective approaches to dissemination and implementation of GSH in different settings to increase access to treatment., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

Background and Objective: Clinic-based programs for childhood obesity are not available to a large proportion of the population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a guided self-help treatment of pediatric obesity (GSH-PO) compared with a delayed treatment control and to evaluate the impact of GSH-PO 6-months posttreatment., Methods: Fifty overweight or obese 8- to 12-year-old children and their parents were randomly assigned to immediate treatment or to delayed treatment. The GSH-PO includes 12 visits over 5 months and addresses key components included in more intensive clinic-based programs. Children and parents in the immediate treatment arm were assessed at time 1 (T1), participated in GSH-PO between T1 and T2, and completed their 6-month posttreatment assessment at T3. Children and parents in the delayed treatment arm were assessed at T1, participated in GSH-PO between T2 and T3, and completed their 6-month posttreatment assessment at T4. The main outcome measures were BMI, BMI z score, and percentage overweight (%OW)., Results: Children in the immediate treatment GSH-PO arm decreased their BMI significantly more than did the delayed treatment arm (BMI group × time = -1.39; P < .001). Similar results were found for BMI z score and %OW. At the 6-month posttreatment assessment, changes resulting from GSH-PO were maintained for BMI z score and %OW but not BMI (BMI time effect = -0.06, not significant; BMI z score time effect = -0.10, P < .001; %OW time effect = -4.86, P < .05)., Conclusions: The GSH-PO showed initial efficacy in decreasing BMI for children in this study. Additional efficacy and translational studies are needed to additionally evaluate GSH-PO.