Search

We report a patient with non-Down syndrome AML, also known as AMKL, with monosomy 7, who was also obese and had a hearing impairment and mental retardation. Non-myeloablative bone marrow transplantation was performed successfully after the patient received less aggressive azacitidine treatment, without the usual intensive induction chemotherapy regimen for AML.

We evaluated the efficacy of CRT and IT chemotherapy, in addition to conditioning including TBI, for the prevention of CNS relapse, in allogeneic HSCT for childhood ALL. From January 1999 to December 2009, a total of 48 patients, without previous or presenting CNS involvement, underwent HSCT for ALL. All patients received myeloablative conditioning including TBI of 12 or 13.2 Gy and IT chemotherapy twice between days -10 and -2 prior to HSCT. Twenty-five patients received CRT prior to TBI (CRT+), and 23 patients did not (CRT-). CRT+ and CRT- patients had a seven-yr EFS rate of 40.0 ± 9.8% and 41.7 ± 10.6%, respectively (p = 0.8252). The seven-yr relapse rates for CRT+ and CRT- patients were 45.0 ± 11.2% and 38.4 ± 11.6%, respectively (p = 0.7460). CNS relapses were evident in 1 (4.0%) CRT+ patient and 1 (4.4%) CRT- patient (p = 1.000). There were no significant differences in EFS and the probability of CNS relapse between CRT+ and CRT- patients. These results demonstrate that CRT and IT chemotherapy, in addition to conditioning chemotherapy, may not be necessary in childhood ALL patients without previous or presenting CNS involvement.

The impact of a second all-SCT on the long-term outcomes of children who relapse after allo-SCT has been unclear. We retrospectively analyzed the long-term outcomes of different salvage treatments for such children. Sixty-six children with hematological malignancies (40 ALL, 22 AML, three MDS, and one CML) who relapsed after a first allo-SCT received either a second allo-SCT (n = 16) or CTx and/or DLI (n = 50). The median follow-up for all children was 9.1 yr. The five-yr OS after relapse was significantly better in patients who underwent a second allo-SCT (42.9%) than in patients treated with CTx and/or DLI (11.8%) (p < 0.05). However, this advantage diminished with increasing time. The eight-yr OS for these groups of patients were 21.4% and 11.8%, respectively (p = n.s.). Among the 16 patients who received a second allo-SCT, two died more than five yr after the second allo-SCT. A second allo-SCT can therefore lead to a prolonged OS in patients who relapse after allo-SCT. However, a second allo-SCT should be selected carefully. This is because the mortality rate is still high, even when there is an extensive duration of time following the second allo-SCT.

The impact of a second all-SCT on the long-term outcomes of children who relapse after allo-SCT has been unclear. We retrospectively analyzed the long-term outcomes of different salvage treatments for such children. Sixty-six children with hematological malignancies (40 ALL, 22 AML, three MDS, and one CML) who relapsed after a first allo-SCT received either a second allo-SCT (n = 16) or CTx and/or DLI (n = 50). The median follow-up for all children was 9.1 yr. The five-yr OS after relapse was significantly better in patients who underwent a second allo-SCT (42.9%) than in patients treated with CTx and/or DLI (11.8%) (p0.05). However, this advantage diminished with increasing time. The eight-yr OS for these groups of patients were 21.4% and 11.8%, respectively (p = n.s.). Among the 16 patients who received a second allo-SCT, two died more than five yr after the second allo-SCT. A second allo-SCT can therefore lead to a prolonged OS in patients who relapse after allo-SCT. However, a second allo-SCT should be selected carefully. This is because the mortality rate is still high, even when there is an extensive duration of time following the second allo-SCT.