Search

We aimed to identify the effect of suction pressure and catheter size on change in lung volume during open and closed endotracheal suction. Anesthetized piglets (n = 12) were intubated with a 4.0-mm endotracheal tube. Lung injury was induced with saline lavage. Three suction methods (open, closed in-line, and closed with a side-port adaptor) were performed in random order using 6, 7, and 8 French gauge (FG) catheters, at vacuum pressures of 80, 140, and 200 mm Hg. Lung volume change was measured with respiratory inductive plethysmography. Overall, open suction resulted in greater lung volume loss during and at 60-s postsuction than either closed method (p < 0.001). When open and closed methods were analyzed separately, volume change was independent of catheter size and suction pressure with open suction. With closed suction, volume loss increased with larger catheter sizes and higher suction pressures (p < 0.001). With an 8-FG catheter and suction pressure of 140 or 200 mm Hg, volume loss was equivalent with open and closed suction. Lung volume changes are influenced by catheter size and suction pressure, as well as suction method. With commonly used suction pressures and catheter sizes, closed suction has no advantage in preventing loss of volume in this animal model.

In newborn infants, closed endotracheal tube (ETT) suction may reduce associated adverse effects, but it is not clear whether ventilation is maintained during the procedure. We aimed to determine the effect of ETT size, catheter size, and suction pressure on ventilation parameters measured distal to the ETT. Suction was performed on a test lung, ventilated with conventional (CMV) and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) using ETT sizes 2.5-4.0 mm, catheter sizes 5-8 French gauge (Fr), and suction pressures 80-200 mm Hg. Tracheal and circuit peak inspiratory pressure, positive end-expiratory pressure, and tracheal tidal volume (VT) were recorded for each suction episode. During both CMV and HFOV, tracheal pressures and VT were considerably reduced by suctioning; this reduction was dependent on the combination of ETT, catheter, and suction pressure. Loss of VT, inflation pressure (CMV), and pressure amplitude (HFOV) occurred primarily with insertion of the catheter, and loss of end-expiratory pressure (CMV) and mean tracheal pressure (HFOV) occurred with the application of suction. Circuit pressures were reduced to lesser degree. We conclude that airway pressures and VT are not maintained during closed endotracheal suction with either CMV or HFOV, and choice of equipment and settings will affect the degree of interruption to ventilation.