Search

We present a case of a pediatric patient with congenital unfused anterior and posterior arches of the atlas (C1), also known as bipartite atlas, who sustained a traumatic injury during gymnastics. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the cervical spine raised concern for abnormal separation of the midline cleft of the anterior arch of C1. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed focal, edema-like signal in the midline cleft of C1. She was advised by neurosurgery to remain in a hard cervical collar for 6 weeks. She recovered after conservative treatment and returned to gymnastics. This case shows that a congenital unfused anterior arch of the atlas identified on CT after cervical trauma should not always be interpreted as an incidental finding. If a superimposed injury is suspected, MRI helps evaluate for traumatic injury, particularly if it is associated with upper cervical pain and tenderness or pain with neck movements. An additional case reiterates our findings.

Magnetic resonance imaging is a multipurpose imaging modality that is largely safe, given the lack of ionizing radiation. However there are electromagnetic and biological effects on human tissue when exposed to magnetic environments, and hence there is a risk of adverse events occurring with these exams. It is imperative to understand these risks and develop methods to minimize them and prevent consequent adverse events. Implementing these safety practices in pediatric MR imaging has been somewhat limited because of gaps in information and knowledge among the personnel who are closely involved in the MR environment. The American College of Radiology has provided guidelines on MR safety practices that are helpful in minimizing such adverse events. This article provides an overview of the issues related to MR safety and practical ways to implement them across different health care facilities.

During the last 15 years, peer review has been widely incorporated into radiology quality improvement programs. However, current implementations are variable and carry concerns, including subjectivity of numerical scores and a sense of merely satisfying regulatory requirements. The Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) Quality and Safety Committee sought to evaluate the state of peer review programs in pediatric radiology practices, including implementation methods, perceived functions, strengths and weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement. We distributed an online 16-question survey to SPR members. Questions pertained to the type of peer review system, the use of numerical scores and comments, how feedback on discordances is given and received, and the use of peer learning conferences. We collected 219 responses (15% of survey invitations), 80% of which were from children’s hospitals. Fifty percent of respondents said they use a picture archiving and communication system (PACS)-integrated peer review system. Comment-enhanced feedback for interpretive discordances was either very important or somewhat important to performance improvement in 86% of responses, compared to 48% with a similar perception of numerical scores. Sixty-eight percent of respondents said they either rarely or never check their numerical scores, and 82% either strongly or somewhat agreed that comments are more effective feedback than numerical scores. Ninety-three percent either strongly or somewhat agreed that peer learning conferences would be beneficial to their practice. Forty-eight percent thought that their current peer review system should be modified. Survey results demonstrate that peer review systems in pediatric radiology practices are implemented variably, and nearly half of respondents believe their systems should be modified. Most respondents prefer feedback in the form of comments and peer learning conferences, which are thought to be more beneficial for performance improvement than numerical scores.

We present a case of a pediatric patient with congenital unfused anterior and posterior arches of the atlas (C1), also known as bipartite atlas, who sustained a traumatic injury during gymnastics. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the cervical spine raised concern for abnormal separation of the midline cleft of the anterior arch of C1. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed focal, edema-like signal in the midline cleft of C1. She was advised by neurosurgery to remain in a hard cervical collar for 6 weeks. She recovered after conservative treatment and returned to gymnastics. This case shows that a congenital unfused anterior arch of the atlas identified on CT after cervical trauma should not always be interpreted as an incidental finding. If a superimposed injury is suspected, MRI helps evaluate for traumatic injury, particularly if it is associated with upper cervical pain and tenderness or pain with neck movements. An additional case reiterates our findings.

Pediatric radiology departments across the globe face unique challenges in the midst of the current COVID-19 pandemic that have not been addressed in professional guidelines. Providing a safe environment for personnel while continuing to deliver optimal care to patients is feasible when abiding by fundamental recommendations. In this article, we review current infection control practices across the multiple pediatric institutions represented on the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) Quality and Safety committee. We discuss the routes of infectious transmission and appropriate transmission-based precautions, in addition to exploring strategies to optimize personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies. This work serves as a summary of current evidence-based recommendations for infection control, and current best practices specific to pediatric radiologists. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00247-020-04713-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Magnetic resonance imaging is a multipurpose imaging modality that is largely safe, given the lack of ionizing radiation. However there are electromagnetic and biological effects on human tissue when exposed to magnetic environments, and hence there is a risk of adverse events occurring with these exams. It is imperative to understand these risks and develop methods to minimize them and prevent consequent adverse events. Implementing these safety practices in pediatric MR imaging has been somewhat limited because of gaps in information and knowledge among the personnel who are closely involved in the MR environment. The American College of Radiology has provided guidelines on MR safety practices that are helpful in minimizing such adverse events. This article provides an overview of the issues related to MR safety and practical ways to implement them across different health care facilities.

During the last 15 years, peer review has been widely incorporated into radiology quality improvement programs. However, current implementations are variable and carry concerns, including subjectivity of numerical scores and a sense of merely satisfying regulatory requirements. The Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) Quality and Safety Committee sought to evaluate the state of peer review programs in pediatric radiology practices, including implementation methods, perceived functions, strengths and weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement. We distributed an online 16-question survey to SPR members. Questions pertained to the type of peer review system, the use of numerical scores and comments, how feedback on discordances is given and received, and the use of peer learning conferences. We collected 219 responses (15% of survey invitations), 80% of which were from children's hospitals. Fifty percent of respondents said they use a picture archiving and communication system (PACS)-integrated peer review system. Comment-enhanced feedback for interpretive discordances was either very important or somewhat important to performance improvement in 86% of responses, compared to 48% with a similar perception of numerical scores. Sixty-eight percent of respondents said they either rarely or never check their numerical scores, and 82% either strongly or somewhat agreed that comments are more effective feedback than numerical scores. Ninety-three percent either strongly or somewhat agreed that peer learning conferences would be beneficial to their practice. Forty-eight percent thought that their current peer review system should be modified. Survey results demonstrate that peer review systems in pediatric radiology practices are implemented variably, and nearly half of respondents believe their systems should be modified. Most respondents prefer feedback in the form of comments and peer learning conferences, which are thought to be more beneficial for performance improvement than numerical scores.

The wide availability of ultrasound, along with its lack of ionizing radiation burden and need for sedation for most exams, often make sonography the first line in the imaging evaluation of children. The developing osseous anatomy of the spine in young infants provides a distinct window allowing for a detailed depiction of the spinal canal and its contents, which is not present in older children or adults. Here we review the clinical indications, sonographic technique, normal anatomy and pathology for imaging the lumbosacral spine in neonates and young infants. Additionally, we review the procedure for ultrasound assessment of the lengthening of magnetically controlled growing spinal rods, which allows orthopedists and radiologists to evaluate the effectiveness of distraction procedures of this hardware without the use of ionizing radiation.

Congenital pouch colon (CPC) is a rare form of high ano-rectal malformation (ARM) in which part of or the entire colon is replaced by a pouch with a fistula to the genito-urinary tract. According to the Saxena-Mathur classification CPC is divided into five types. Although plain abdominal radiographs are taken in infants with suspicion of CPC to detect large dilatation of the pouch, the determination of the type of CPC is made during surgical exploration. Since large variations in the length of normal colon are present in the various types, management strategy options can be determined only at the time of surgery. The aim of this study was to review abdominal radiographs of children with congenital pouch colon (CPC) and evaluate their value in determining the type of CPC prior to surgical exploration to assist pre-operative planning. Over a 12-year period (1995–2007), CPC was documented in 80 children (52 boys and 28 girls, age range 1 day–9 years, median 2.4 days) and retrospective analysis of plain abdominal radiographs of 77 children at the time of presentation was performed. Radiographic findings were correlated with surgical findings. Of 77 children, 5 were excluded from the study since the pouch colon was perforated. The direction of the pouch apex was correlated with surgical findings to determine the CPC type (P