Search

Conflicting results have been reported in small non-homogenous groups of children with chronic renal failure in terms of casual blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) parameters and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). The aim of our study was to assess the value of ABPM and hematological and biochemical parameters in predicting LVH in children on chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD). Echocardiography and 24-h ABPM were performed in addition to routine biochemical and hematological evaluations in 47 children on CPD (26 male, 21 female; mean age 14.74 ± 3.52 years). Mean daytime systolic blood pressure (SBP) and mean daytime diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values were found to be higher than the mean casual SBP and DBP ( p = 0.001) values. Thirty-three (70.2%) children had LVH. The correlations between the left ventricular mass index and ABPM variables were good. Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed daytime SBP load (β = 0.652; p < 0.01) and hematocrit (β = −0.282; p < 0.01) to be independent predictors of LVH. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values for the combination of the SBP load >15% and hematocrit value <31% for predicting LVH were 95 [95% confidence interval (CI) 76–99], 78 (95%CI 45–94), 91 (95%CI 73–98), and 88% (95%CI 69–96%), respectively. We conclude that: (1) LVH is prevalent in children on CPD, and (2) a target hematocrit level >31% and daytime SBP load <15% may be preventive for the progression of LVH in the follow-up of children on CPD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to assess the level of agreement between central European ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and American Task Force (TF) criteria when applied to blood pressure (BP) measurements collected by ABPM to evaluate patients with hypertension. In 169 patients, we applied both sets of criteria and calculated mean daytime and nighttime BP and daytime BP loads. The frequency of hypertension for daytime systolic BP was significantly higher when TF criteria were used ( p ≤ 0.001). However, the frequency of hypertension for nighttime systolic BP was significantly increased when ABPM criteria were applied ( p ≤ 0.01). Therefore, with daytime ABPM measurements, hypertension was overdiagnosed with TF criteria, while nighttime hypertension was underdiagnosed using TF criteria. In contrast with previous reports, 40% of our patients with essential hypertension showed absence of nighttime dipping, regardless of the criteria used. The number of hypertensive patients was significantly higher using ABPM compared to TF criteria when patients with BP load ≥50% were evaluated ( p ≤ 0.01). Therefore, current recommendations for ABPM use in children such as to define white coat hypertension or as a screening tool to differentiate between primary and secondary hypertension need to be validated using yet to be produced normative ABPM criteria in American children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]