1. The HEADS-ED
- Author
-
Paula Cloutier, Mario Cappelli, Christine Polihronis, Clare Gray, Nathalie R. Thibedeau, Sarah Reid, Roger Zemek, Mona Jabbour, and Allison Kennedy
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,medicine.medical_treatment ,MEDLINE ,Risk Assessment ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,030225 pediatrics ,Health care ,medicine ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,Child ,Referral and Consultation ,business.industry ,Mental Disorders ,Reproducibility of Results ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,General Medicine ,Emergency department ,Mental health ,Confidence interval ,Mental Health ,Family medicine ,Relative risk ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,Emergency Medicine ,Physical therapy ,Female ,Emergency Service, Hospital ,Risk assessment ,business ,Crisis intervention - Abstract
Objectives This effectiveness study aimed to evaluate the clinical use of the HEADS-ED tool for patients presenting to a pediatric emergency department (PED) for mental health (MH) care. Methods In this pragmatic trial, PED physicians used the HEADS-ED to guide their assessment and identify areas of MH need in 639 patients (mean [SD], 15.16 [1.40] years; female, 72.6%) who presented to the emergency department with MH concerns between May 2013 and March 2014. Results The HEADS-ED guided consultation to psychiatry/crisis, with 86% receiving a recommended consult. Those with a HEADS-ED score of greater than or equal to 8 and suicidality of 2 (relative risk, 2.64; confidence interval, 2.28-3.06) had a 164% increased risk of physicians requesting a consult compared with those with a score of less than 8 or greater than or equal to 8 with no suicidality of 2. The HEADS-ED mean score was significantly higher for those who received a consult (M = 6.91) than those who did not (M = 4.70; P = 0.000). Similarly, the mean score for those admitted was significantly higher (M = 7.21) than those discharged (M = 5.28; P = 0.000). Agreement on needs requiring action between PED physicians and crisis intervention workers was obtained for a subset of 140 patients and ranged from 62% to 93%. Conclusions Results support the HEADS-ED's use by PED physicians to help guide the assessment and referral process and for discussing the clinical needs of patients among health care providers using a common action-oriented language.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF