1. Accuracy and Specific Value of Cardiovascular 3D-Models in Pediatric CT-Angiography
- Author
-
Martin Glöckler, Robert Cesnjevar, Sven Dittrich, Oliver Rompel, André Rüffer, Nicole Ehret, Matthias Hammon, Hannes Seuss, and Michael Uder
- Subjects
Heart Defects, Congenital ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Heart disease ,Computed Tomography Angiography ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Imaging, Three-Dimensional ,medicine ,Humans ,Segmentation ,Child ,Computed tomography angiography ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Models, Cardiovascular ,Infant ,Reproducibility of Results ,Volume rendering ,Heart ,Vascular surgery ,medicine.disease ,Cardiac surgery ,Maximum intensity projection ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,Angiography ,Female ,Radiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Computed tomography (CT)-angiography is routinely performed prior to catheter-based and surgical treatment in congenital heart disease. To date, little is known about the accuracy and advantage of different 3D-reconstructions in CT-data. Exact anatomical information is crucial. We analyzed 35 consecutive CT-angiographies of infants with congenital heart disease. All datasets are reconstructed three-dimensionally using volume rendering technique (VRT) and threshold-based segmentation (stereolithographic model, STL). Additionally, the two-dimensional maximum intensity projection (MIP) reconstructs two-dimensional data. In each dataset and resulting image, measurements of vascular diameters for four different vessels were estimated and compared to the reference standard, measured via multiplanar reformation (MPR). The resulting measurements obtained via the STL-images, MIP-images, and the VRT-images were compared with the reference standard. There was a significant difference (p
- Published
- 2017