1. Outcomes of dexmedetomidine sedation for drug‐induced sleep ciné magnetic resonance imaging studies in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea patients
- Author
-
Robert J. Fleck, Lili Ding, Vera Winograd-Gomez, Mohamed Mahmoud, Fang Yang, Stacey L. Ishman, Mario Patino, Suryakumar Narayanasamy, and Hem Joshi
- Subjects
medicine.drug_class ,Polysomnography ,Sedation ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine ,medicine ,Humans ,Hypnotics and Sedatives ,Ketamine ,Dexmedetomidine ,Child ,Retrospective Studies ,Sleep Apnea, Obstructive ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Sleep apnea ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,medicine.disease ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Obstructive sleep apnea ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Pharmaceutical Preparations ,Sedative ,Anesthesia ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,medicine.symptom ,Sleep ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
BACKGROUND Dexmedetomidine is utilized as a sedative agent for drug-induced sleep cine magnetic resonance imaging studies due to its ability to mimic natural sleep and lack of respiratory depressant effects. The outcomes of dexmedetomidine sedation such as respiratory complications and unplanned admissions in obstructive sleep apnea patients undergoing these studies are currently unknown. AIM To describe the outcomes of dexmedetomidine sedation for outpatient drug-induced sleep magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients with obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS This is a retrospective chart review conducted in pediatric patients with obstructive sleep apnea undergoing outpatient drug-induced sleep cine magnetic resonance imaging studies with dexmedetomidine sedation. Demographics, comorbidities, polysomnography study results, vital signs, respiratory complications, airway interventions, successful completion of the scan, and unplanned hospital admissions were measured. MAIN RESULTS We analyzed 337 patients aged 2-18 years (median age of 11 years). The imaging was completed with dexmedetomidine as the sole sedative agent in 61% (N = 207) patients. Ketamine was administered as additional sedative agent in 36% (N = 122) of the patients. There was no difference in sedation-related adverse events and respiratory complications with regard to the severity of sleep apnea with the exception of mild desaturation episodes (SpO2 85%-90%). Patients who received additional sedative agents had significantly longer recovery room stay (71.5 [44] vs 55 [39] minutes; 95% CI of difference [9 to 23 min], p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF