Search

Objective Research has shown that complicated grief has the potential to adversely affect bereaved individuals, and in this context, understanding how mental health professionals engage with it in practice is of relevance. Gaining an understanding of professionals’ knowledge, attitudes, skills and training in relation to complicated grief could provide insights that will inform their training and professional development. The aim of this study was to consider professionals’ engagement with complicated grief, as represented by self-reported knowledge, attitudes, skills and training. Methods The study used a three-phase mixed methods design (systematic review, qualitative interviews, and a quantitative survey) with empirical data being collected from psychologists, psychiatrists and counselor/psychotherapists. Results Analysis yielded 15 integrated findings across the three phases, which were grouped into two clusters: the first highlighted tension between professionals’ reported confidence and competence and the second explored the parameters and contribution of research and training in this area. Conclusion Professionals’ perception of their competence to work with complicated grief seems overstated and research and professional practice are not aligned. Practice implications These findings are positioned to inform empirically supported training that addresses identified deficits in professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and skills. It is important therefore that training is reflective of the needs of different professional groups.

Objective A systematic review and qualitative synthesis was undertaken to deduce the knowledge, attitudes, skills and training of mental health professionals regarding complicated grief (CG). Methods PsychInfo, Embase, Medline, CINAHL, PBSC, Web of Science and ERIC databases were used to identify relevant literature. Searches were executed from inception to September 2014. Results The electronic search yielded 305 results. Forty-one papers were selected for full text review, 20 were included for analysis. 6 examined primary data, the remaining 14 being reviews, opinion or guideline pieces. Conclusions Despite the lack of consensus on terminology, criteria and diagnosis, it appears that there is more than sufficient agreement within the CG research community regarding the knowledge and skills required to assist someone presenting with CG. A palpable fear of medicalising grief exists, but this would seem to be based on a conflation of normal grief and CG. This review highlights the mainly unidirectional nature of current research, the voice of the practitioner being largely unheard. A need for and an interest in training in CG was expressed. Practice implications There is an urgent need to translate research findings into clinical practice. Training must take account of attitudinal barriers to implementation, balancing evidence and stories.