Search

With the emergence of multiple lines of highly effective Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) directed therapy, accurate identification of HER2 positive tumour has become a critical aspect in the histopathological analysis of breast cancers. Multifocal invasive breast carcinomas are relatively common, and given the aggressive inherent biology of HER2 positive disease, identification of even small tumours with HER2 positive status may be of importance for treatment planning. There are currently no clear guidelines as to whether all of these foci should be tested for HER2 status. We reviewed the results of 172 patients in whom HER2 in situhybridisation (ISH) testing was performed on at least two ipsilateral synchronous invasive carcinomas. Discordant results in different invasive foci were relatively uncommon and occurred in only eight (5%) of the 172 patients. This showed a statistically significant correlation with similarly discordant oestrogen receptor (ER) results. In addition HER2 discordance was more likely amongst different tumour foci if these arose in distinct and separate areas of DCIS. An algorithm based on a combination of College of American Pathologists (CAP) recommendation for HER2 testing, differing ER status and background DCIS profile may be useful in detecting these discordant cases.

Testing for HER2 positivity in breast cancer carries implications for prognosis and therapeutic response in patients. In recent times there have been numerous developments and refinements in the available technologies for HER2 testing. In addition to this, guidelines have been developed and modified in an attempt to improve reliability and accuracy of testing. Immunohistochemistry and FISH testing have been the most widely used methodology, and the technique which has the largest knowledge base. Some of the inherent disadvantages have prompted the development of newer brightfield techniques which overcome some of these issues. There is gathering experience with these emerging technologies. Despite efforts to optimise and standardise procedures there remains a small percentage of cases that continue to be unresolved, whether this be due to issues of polysomy of chromosome 17, other complex genetic changes or analytical/interpretative issues. An ideal method for the resolution of these equivocal results should be considered in a specialised testing/referral centre, and this may include karyotyping studies of chromosome 17 or multiple probes for chromosome 17 using fluorescence in situhybridisation or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. It is timely to review of some of the newer techniques available for routine testing and approaches for cases which prove difficult to resolve using conventional testing methodology.

Columnar cell lesions (CCLs) of the breast have been increasingly recognised in biopsies taken to investigate mammographic screen detected microcalcification. The aim of this study was to identify distinct CCL subtypes by systematic analysis of histopathology.

The initial 18 months experience of performing intraoperative imprint cytology for patients with breast cancer undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy is described for a single institution. The learning process is compared with published results from institutions with many years of experience in order to assess progress in reaching those ideal results, and the methodology used by these institutions is reviewed.

Cyelin, or Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is a cell cycle related nuclear protein expressed in increased levels during the late Gl and S phases of DNA synthesis. Previous workers have correlated the degree of PCNA positivity with grade and mitotic activity in solid carcinomas, particularly carcinoma of the breast and colon. We attempted to correlate the degree of PCNA activity in malignant, borderline and benign epithelial tumours of the ovary with a view to determining if this might prove useful in categorising these lesions.