Search

Burrowing behavior is an important adaptation of animals that live in arid and semi-arid conditions. In this paper, we describe examples of vertebrate burrows from the Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Adamantina Formation of the Bauru Basin, Brazil, most likely produced by turtles. The Adamantina Formation preserves abundant and diverse turtle body fossils such as Bauruemys elegans (Testudines: Pleurodira); however turtle burrows have not been previously documented. The newly reported burrows are preserved in fluvial sandstone facies and exposed in sections that partially preserve their three-dimensional geometry. Burrows are simple J-shaped tunnels with a cross-sectional shape that is semicircular (half-dome) with a flattened floor. Such burrows show a partially preserved entrance with an inclined ramp angle (22°), and grooves and ridges up to 1 cm in width preserved along the burrows walls and floor. The architecture and sedimentary facies of the host sandstone body, together with the occurrence of Taenidium barretti and the absence of rhizoliths, suggest that the burrow was excavated by scratch digging into an exposed point bar of a meandering river channel. Based on burrow morphology, dimensions, as well as ridges,and grooves in the walls and floor, we propose that burrows were formed by a chelonian (such as a freshwater turtle) during aestivation. We highlight that these are first examples of turtle burrows reported from the Cretaceous, and their occurrence reinforces the hypothesis that the original function of turtle shells was as an adaptation to fossorial behavior. [Display omitted] • The first freshwater turtle burrows from Cretaceous of South America. • The burrows occur in fluvial point bars of Adamantina Formation. • Evidence of fossorial and aestivation behavior in turtles during Cretaceous. • Results reinforce the hypothesis of fossorial behavior in stem turtles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Extant turtles exhibit a range of ecological adaptations to terrestrial and pelagic marine habitats. Bone shell microanatomy, and specifically, qualitative and quantitative approaches to shell bone porosity, have been used to infer palaeoecology and habitat. However, such inferences are hindered by the lack of a comprehensive sampling of testudine taxa and, in some instances, of long bones of vertebrates other than turtles. In this paper, we carry out an osteohistological analysis of Testudinata shell bones, including 31 different taxa, both extant and extinct, of known habitats. Costal and peripheral elements of published species and new data presented here are statistically analysed. Although, in some cases, values are congruent with those expected for a particular habitat (e.g. Hydromedusa casamayorensis), this is not true for all taxa examined. Moreover, microanatomical features of several taxa (e.g. Chelonia mydas) are inconsistent with habitat data. Results indicate that, although the microanatomical structure of the shell is related to habitat, this is not the only influence and indeed, in several cases, not the most important factor. • A comprehensive qualitative and quantitative description of shell microanatomy of Testudinata is presented. • Data do not support a correlation between costal bone shell microstructure and habitats. • Paleoecological inferences based on bone microstructure must be taken very cautiously. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]