Search

Objective: To determine if commonly used knee radiofrequency ablation (RFA) techniques would be able to completely denervate the knee joint., Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature on knee joint innervation was conducted using the databases Medline, Embase, and PubMed from inception through February 1, 2019. Google Scholar was also searched. Data on the origin, number of articular branches, course, distribution, and frequency of each nerve innervating the knee joint were extracted from the included studies and compared in order to identify variations., Results: Twelve studies of anterior knee joint innervation and six studies of posterior knee joint innervation were included. The anterior knee joint was innervated by 10 nerves and further subdivided into two parts (anteromedial and anterolateral) or four quadrants (superomedial, inferomedial, superolateral, and inferolateral) based on innervation patterns; the posterior knee joint was innervated by two or three nerves, most commonly via the popliteal plexus. There is a lack of precise, validated anatomic targets identifiable with fluoroscopy and ultrasound for knee diagnostic blocks and RFA. Only three of the 12 or potentially 13 nerves innervating the knee joint are targeted by commonly used knee RFA techniques., Conclusions: Commonly used knee RFA techniques would not be able to completely denervate the knee joint. It may not be necessary to capture all of the nerves, but only the nerves mediating a patient's pain. Further clinical studies are required to validate specific diagnostic blocks and evaluate clinical outcomes using rigorous diagnostic blocks and anatomically specific knee RFA techniques., (© 2019 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: To compare the percentage of sacral lateral branches (LBs) that would be captured if lesions were created by seven current sacroiliac joint (SIJ) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) techniques: three monopolar and four bipolar., Design: Cadaveric fluoroscopy study., Setting: Anatomy and surgical skills laboratories., Subjects: Forty cadaveric SIJs., Methods: LBs were exposed, radiopaque wires were sutured to LBs, and anterior-posterior fluoroscopic images through the S1 superior endplate were obtained. Lesions that would be created by 17 versions of seven current SIJ RFA techniques were mapped on the fluoroscopic images. These 17 versions were compared: 1) percentage of LBs that would be captured; 2) percentage of SIJ specimens in which 100% of LBs would be captured; and 3) percentage of LBs that would not be captured at each level (S1-S4)., Results: Both the mean LB and 100% capture rates were greater for the bipolar techniques (93.4-99.7% and 62.5-97.5%, respectively) than for the monopolar techniques (49.6-99.1% and 2.5-92.5%, respectively) evaluated. For the bipolar techniques, 1.5-29.2% of LBs would not be captured at S1 and 0% at S2-S4 vs 0-29.2% at S1-S4 for the cooled monopolar techniques vs 36.9-100% at S1-S4 for the conventional monopolar technique., Conclusions: The findings suggest that, if lesions were created, the RFA needle placement locations of the bipolar techniques evaluated may be capable of capturing all LBs, but those of the current monopolar techniques evaluated may not. Future in vivo imaging studies are required to compare the lesion morphology generated by different SIJ RFA techniques and correlate the findings with clinical outcomes.

Background: Current sacroiliac joint (SIJ) cooled radiofrequency (RF) is based on fluoroscopic anatomy of lateral branches (LBs) in three specimens. Recent studies confirm significant variation in LB positions., Objectives: To determine if common fluoroscopic needle placements for cooled SIJ RF are adequate to lesion all S1-3 LBs. If not, would different targets improve lesion accuracy?, Methods: The LBs of 20 cadavers were dissected bilaterally (40 SIJs), and 26 G radiopaque wires were sutured to the LBs. With a 10-mm radius ruler centered at each foramen, standard targets were assessed, as judged by a clockface on the right, for S1 and S2 at 2:30, 4:00, and 5:30 positions and at S3 at 2:30 and 4:00. Mirror image targets were assessed on the left. Assuming an 8-mm lesion diameter, the percentage of LBs that would not be ablated for each level was determined. Imaging through the superior end plate of S1 was compared against segment specific (SS) imaging., Results: Nine point four percent of LBs would not be ablated at S1 vs 0.99% at S2 vs 35% at S3, and 60% of the 40 SIJs would be completely denervated using current targets. SS imaging did not improve results. Alternate target locations could improve the miss rate to 2.8% at S1 and 0% at S3 and would ablate all LBs in 95% of SIJs., Conclusions: Using a conservative 8-mm lesion measurement, contemporary cooled RF needle targets are inadequate to lesion all target LBs. Modifications to current targets are recommended to increase the effectiveness of the procedure.