Search

In the article, the authors discuss the case of a 24-year-old man with predominant low back pain (LBP) and radiation to the left anterior thigh and a 31-year-old female with LBP to discuss radicular pain from intervertebral disc cysts effectively treated without aspiration by infraneural transforaminal epidural steroid injection. Also mentioned are the possible nonsurgical strategies to treat discal cysts like physical therapy and epidural steroid injection.

Objectives The S1 dorsal foramen is the route for 30% of lumbar transforaminal epidural injections; it is therefore important to identify structures impeding S1 foraminal access. The study objective was to characterize the imaging findings, prevalence, and anatomic origin of synovial cysts presenting within the S1 neural foramen. Methods A case series (N = 14) established imaging characteristics of S1 synovial cysts. Imaging studies of 400 patients undergoing epidural injections were reviewed for lesions compromising S1 foraminal access. Cadaveric dissections defined the relationship of the inferior recess of the L5-S1 facet to the S1 dorsal foramen. Results Elderly patients (mean age = 76) exhibited S1 synovial cysts. Synovial cysts were typically 1–2 cm in diameter, hyperintense on sagittal T2 weighted magnetic resonance images (MRIs), fluid-density on computed tomography, and dorsal to the S1 spinal nerve. Sixty percent of cysts exhibited complex MRI signal characteristics (thick wall, internal structure). Tarlov cysts, in contrast, were larger, lobular, and exhibited pure fluid intensity. Lesions impeded access to the S1 dorsal foramina in 5% of reviewed imaging studies (16 Tarlov cysts, three synovial cysts, one conjoint S1-S2 nerve root). The multifidus muscle was interposed between the L5-S1 facet inferior recess and the S1 dorsal foramen on dissection specimens; severe atrophy of the ipsilateral multifidus was noted on imaging in 17/18 synovial cysts. Conclusions The S1 neural foramina should be inspected on sagittal MRI, when available, for confounding lesions before performing S1 epidural injections. Tarlov cysts are more common than synovial cysts; the latter are seen in elderly patients with severe multifidus atrophy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective This study modeled image-guided epidural drug delivery to test whether intraprocedural distribution of pre-injected contrast reliably predicts the neuroanatomical reach of resiniferatoxin-mediated nociceptive neurolysis. Methods Swine (N = 12) received unilateral L4-S2 computed tomography fluoroscopy injections by a blinded neuroradiologist; 0.25 mL of contrast was pre-injected to confirm dorsal periganglionic targeting, followed by a 0.5-mL injection of 5 µg of resiniferatoxin/Tween80 or vehicle control. Epidural contrast distribution was graded according to maximum medial excursion. Spinal cord substance P immunostaining quantified the magnitude and anatomical range of resiniferatoxin activity. Results Periganglionic injection was well tolerated by all animals without development of neurological deficits or other complications. Swine were a suitable model of human clinical spinal intervention. The transforaminal approach was used at all L4 and 50% of L5 segments; the remaining segments were approached by the interlaminar route. All injections were successful with unilateral contrast distribution for all resiniferatoxin injections (N = 28). Immunohistochemistry showed bilateral ablation of substance P+ fibers entering the spinal cord of all resiniferatoxin-treated segments. The intensity of substance P immunostaining in treated segments fell below the lower 99% confidence interval of controls, defining the knockout phenotype. Substance P knockout occurred over a narrow range and was uncorrelated to the anatomical distribution of pre-injected contrast. Conclusions Periganglionic resiniferatoxin/Tween80 induced bilateral ablation of spinal cord substance P despite exclusively unilateral targeting. These data suggest that the location of pre-injected contrast is an imperfect surrogate for the neuroanatomical range of drugs delivered to the dorsal epidural compartment that may fail to predict contralateral drug effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Setting. Interventional procedures directed toward sources of pain in the axial and appendicular musculoskeletal system are performed with increasing frequency. Despite the presence of evidence- based guidelines for such procedures, there are wide variations in practice. Case reports of serious complications such as spinal cord infarction or infection from spine injections lack appropriate context and create a misleading view of the risks of appropriately performed interventional pain procedures. Objective. To evaluate adverse event rate for interventional spine procedures performed at three academic interventional spine practices. Methods. Quality assurance databases at three academic interventional pain management practices that utilize evidence-based guidelines [1] were interrogated for immediate complications from interventional pain procedures. Review of the electronic medical record verified or refuted the occurrence of a complication. Same-day emergency department transfers or visits were also identified by a records search. Results. Immediate complication data were available for 26,061 consecutive procedures. A radiology practice performed 19,170 epidural steroid (primarily transforaminal), facet, sacroiliac, and trigger point injections (2006-2013). A physiatry practice performed 6,190 spine interventions (2004-2009). A second physiatry practice performed 701 spine procedures (2009-2010). There were no major complications (permanent neurologic deficit or clinically significant bleeding [e.g., epidural hematoma]) with any procedure. Overall complication rate was 1.9% (493/26,061). Vasovagal reactions were the most frequent event (1.1%). Nineteen patients (<0.1%) were transferred to emergency departments for: allergic reactions, chest pain, symptomatic hypertension, and a vasovagal reaction. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that interventional pain procedures are safely performed with extremely low immediate adverse event rates when evidence-based guidelines are observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the myths and facts with regards to the safety of the usage of Gadolinium-based contrast media as standard iodinated contrast agents for spinal procedures. Topics include the risks associated with the use of iodinated contrast media and corticosteroids, the complications of using fluoroscopically-guided transforaminal epidural steroid injections, and the use of gadobutrol for spinal procedures.