Search

Background: Gestational age estimation by second-trimester ultrasound biometry introduces systematic errors due to sex differences in early foetal growth, consequently increasing the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. Ultrasound estimation earlier in pregnancy may reduce this bias., Objectives: To investigate the distribution of sex ratio by gestational age and estimate the risk of adverse outcomes in male foetuses born early-term and female foetuses born post-term by first- and second-trimester ultrasound estimations., Methods: This population-based study compared two cohorts of births with gestational age based on first- and second-trimester ultrasound in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway between 2016 and 2020. We used a log-binomial regression model to estimate adjusted relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for Apgar score <7 at 5 min, umbilical artery pH <7.05, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and respiratory morbidity in relation to foetal sex., Results: The sex ratio at birth in gestational weeks 36-43 showed less male predominance in pregnancies estimated in first compared to second trimester. Any adverse outcome was registered in 627 of 4470 male infants born in gestational weeks 37-38 and 618 of 6406 females born ≥41 weeks. Male infants born in weeks 37-38 had lower risk of NICU admission (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.58, 0.99), Apgar score <7 at 5 min (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.28, 1.41) and respiratory morbidity (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.37, 1.25) in first- compared to second-trimester estimations. Female infants estimated in first trimester born ≥41 weeks had lower risk of umbilical artery pH <7.05, NICU admissions and respiratory morbidity; however, CIs were wide., Conclusions: Early ultrasound estimation of gestational age may reduce the excess risk of adverse neonatal outcomes and highlight the role of foetal sex and the timing of ultrasound assessment in the clinical evaluation of preterm and post-term pregnancies., (© 2023 The Authors. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The birth prevalence of congenital heart defects (CHDs) has decreased in Canada and Europe. Recommended intake of folic acid in pregnancy is a suggestive risk-reducing factor for CHDs. We investigated the association between periconceptional intake of folic acid supplements and infant risk of CHDs., Methods: Information on maternal intake of folic acid supplements before and during pregnancy in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1999-2009 was updated with information on CHD diagnoses from national health registers and the Cardiovascular Diseases in Norway Project. The association between folic acid intake and infant risk of CHD was estimated as relative risk (RR) with binomial log linear regression., Results: Among 517 784 non-chromosomal singleton births, 6200 children were identified with CHD and 1153 with severe CHD. For all births, 18.4% of the mothers initiated folic acid supplements before pregnancy and 31.6% during pregnancy. The adjusted RR for severe CHD was 0.99 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86, 1.13] comparing periconceptional intake of folic acid with no intake. Specifically, RR for conotruncal defects was 0.99 [95% CI 0.80, 1.22], atrioventricular septal defects 1.19 [95% CI 0.78, 1.81], left ventricular outflow tract obstructions 1.02 [95% CI 0.78, 1.32], and right ventricular outflow tract obstructions 0.97 [95% CI 0.72, 1.29]. Birth prevalence of septal defects was higher in the group exposed to folic acid supplements with RR 1.19 [95% CI 1.10, 1.30]., Conclusions: Periconceptional folic acid supplement use showed no association with severe CHDs in the newborn. An unexpected association with an increased risk of septal defects warrants further investigation., (© 2015 The Authors. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Maternal folic acid supplementation between subsequent pregnancies may be important to reduce the risk of low folate status associated with short interpregnancy intervals. We examined how the prevalence of preconception folic acid use for a given pregnancy in Norwegian women varied according to the time interval from the previous pregnancy., Methods: Analysis was based on 48 855 pairs of pregnancies with the second pregnancy included in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (birth years 1999-2009). Interpregnancy interval was defined as the time from birth of a child to the conception of the subsequent sibling. Preconception folic acid use was defined as any use of folic acid-containing supplements within the last 4 weeks before the second pregnancy., Results: The prevalence of preconception folic acid use was 31%. Among women with a term birth (≥37 weeks) in the previous pregnancy (92%), those with interpregnancy intervals ≤12 and ≥49 months were associated with up to 35% lower prevalence of preconception folic acid use for the second pregnancy, relative to the reference group (13-24 months). The low use in short intervals was mainly attributable to lower proportion of planned pregnancies and fewer women with higher education. Among women with a preterm birth (<37 weeks) in the previous pregnancy (8%), preconception folic acid use significantly decreased with increasing pregnancy spacing., Conclusions: Our finding of a lower preconception folic acid use in women with both short and long interpregnancy intervals might help identifying those with higher risk of folate deficiency and preventing unwanted pregnancy outcomes., (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: This study examined potential self-selection bias in a large pregnancy cohort by comparing exposure-outcome associations from the cohort to similar associations obtained from nationwide registry data. The outcome under study was specialist-confirmed diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs)., Methods: The cohort sample (n = 89 836) was derived from the population-based prospective Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study and its substudy of ASDs, the Autism Birth Cohort (ABC) study. The nationwide registry data were derived from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (n = 507 856). The children were born in 1999–2007, and seven prenatal and perinatal exposures were selected for analyses., Results: ASDs were reported for 234 (0.26%) children in the cohort and 2072 (0.41%) in the nationwide population. Compared with the nationwide population, the cohort had an under-representation of the youngest women (<25 years), those who had single status, mothers who smoked during pregnancy, and non-users of prenatal folic acid supplements. The ratios of the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) in the cohort over the adjusted ORs in the nationwide population were as follows; primipara pregnancy: 1.39/1.22, prenatal folic acid use: 0.85/0.86, prenatal smoking: 1.20/1.17, preterm birth (<37 weeks): 1.48/1.42, low birthweight (<2500 g): 1.60/1.58, male sex: 4.39/4.59 (unadjusted only); and caesarean section history: 1.03/1.04., Conclusions: Associations estimated between ASDs and perinatal and prenatal exposures in the cohort are close to those estimated in the nationwide population. Self-selection does not appear to compromise validity of exposure-outcome associations in the ABC study.

Self-selection in epidemiological studies may introduce selection bias and influence the validity of study results. To evaluate potential bias due to self-selection in a large prospective pregnancy cohort in Norway, the authors studied differences in prevalence estimates and association measures between study participants and all women giving birth in Norway. Women who agreed to participate in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (43.5% of invited; n = 73 579) were compared with all women giving birth in Norway (n = 398 849) using data from the population-based Medical Birth Registry of Norway in 2000-2006. Bias in the prevalence of 23 exposure and outcome variables was measured as the ratio of relative frequencies, whereas bias in exposure-outcome associations of eight relationships was measured as the ratio of odds ratios. Statistically significant relative differences in prevalence estimates between the cohort participants and the total population were found for all variables, except for maternal epilepsy, chronic hypertension and pre-eclampsia. There was a strong under-representation of the youngest women (<25 years), those living alone, mothers with more than two previous births and with previous stillbirths (relative deviation 30-45%). In addition, smokers, women with stillbirths and neonatal death were markedly under-represented in the cohort (relative deviation 22-43%), while multivitamin and folic acid supplement users were over-represented (relative deviation 31-43%). Despite this, no statistically relative differences in association measures were found between participants and the total population regarding the eight exposure-outcome associations. Using data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, this study suggests that prevalence estimates of exposures and outcomes, but not estimates of exposure-outcome associations are biased due to self-selection in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study.