1. Psychological impact of surveillance in patients with a defibrillator lead under advisory: a prospective evaluation.
- Author
-
D'Antono B, Goldfarb M, Solomon C, Sturmer M, Becker G, Essebag V, Hadjis T, Gizicki E, Gelais JS, Sas G, Côté MC, and Kus T
- Subjects
- Aged, Anxiety psychology, Clinical Alarms statistics & numerical data, Comorbidity, Depression psychology, Equipment Failure statistics & numerical data, Female, Humans, Incidence, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Quebec epidemiology, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Anxiety epidemiology, Defibrillators, Implantable psychology, Defibrillators, Implantable statistics & numerical data, Depression epidemiology, Electrodes, Implanted psychology, Electrodes, Implanted statistics & numerical data, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Background: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads are subject to technical failures and the impact of the resulting public advisories on patient welfare is unclear. The psychological status of patients who received an advisory for their Medtronic Fidelis ICD lead (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) and followed either by self-surveillance for alarm or home monitoring with CareLink was evaluated prospectively and compared to patients with ICDs not under advisory., Methods: One hundred sixty consecutive consenting patients (90 alarms, 24 Carelinks, 46 controls) were recruited within 1.5 years of advisory notification. Advisory patients were seen immediately before being told that the automatic lead surveillance utilized since the advisory had been inadequate in warning of impending fracture, as well as 1 and 6 months after programming was optimized. Depression, anxiety, quality of life (QoL), and ICD-related concerns were assessed., Results: Symptoms of depression and state anxiety were experienced by 31% and 48% of patients, respectively. QoL was impaired on all subscales. No significant group differences in distress and ICD-related concerns emerged at baseline or at follow-up. At baseline, alarm patients reported greater limitations because of body pain compared to controls (P < 0.05). All patients showed a significant reduction in body pain-related QoL at the final versus first two evaluations (P < 0.001). Advisory patients were significantly less satisfied with surveillance at follow-up than at baseline (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: There was limited evidence for worse psychosocial functioning in those at risk for ICD lead fracture, irrespective of surveillance method. However, many control and advisory patients experienced chronic distress for which counseling may prove beneficial., (©2012, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF