1. Robot-assisted Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion in Adults: A Comparative Study With Manual Insertion
- Author
-
Yann Nguyen, Ghizlene Lahlou, Isabelle Mosnier, Olivier Sterkers, Evelyne Ferrary, Hannah Daoudi, Vincent Lefeuvre, and Renato Torres
- Subjects
Adult ,Retrospective review ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Straight electrode ,Outcome measures ,Computed tomography ,Robotics ,Cochlear Implantation ,Sensory Systems ,Manual insertion ,Cochlea ,Electrodes, Implanted ,Basilar membrane ,Cochlear Implants ,Otorhinolaryngology ,Cochlear implant ,medicine ,Electrode array ,Humans ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,Retrospective Studies ,Biomedical engineering - Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the first cochlear array insertions using a robot-assisted technique, with different types of straight or precurved electrode arrays, compared with arrays manually inserted into the cochlea. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING Tertiary otologic center. PATIENTS Twenty cochlear implantations in the robot-assisted group and 40 in the manually inserted group. INTERVENTIONS Cochlear implantations using a robot-assisted technique (RobOtol) with straight (eight Cochlear CI522/622, and eight Advanced Bionics Hifocus Slim J) or precurved (four Advanced Bionics Hifocus Mid-Scala) matched to manual cochlear implantations. Three-dimensional reconstruction images of the basilar membrane and the electrode array were obtained from pre- and postimplantation computed tomography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Rate and localization of scalar translocations. RESULTS For straight electrode arrays, scalar translocations occurred in 19% (3/16) of the robot-assisted group and 31% (10/32) of the manually inserted group. Considering the number of translocated electrodes, this was lower in the robot-assisted group (7%) than in the manually inserted group (16%) (p
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF