Search

High-resolution ultrasound (HRU) has recently demonstrated the potential to facilitate diagnosis and treatment of upper extremity compression neuropathy. The authors hypothesized that HRU can improve preoperative evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) and that changes in ulnar nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) after cubital tunnel release may correlate with outcomes. Nineteen adult patients diagnosed with UNE who were scheduled for surgical decompression by a single hand surgeon were enrolled. Electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing, HRU of the ulnar nerve, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, and McGowan grade were obtained pre- and postoperatively. Fourteen patients completed the study. Statistically significant improvements were found in CSA measurements and QuickDASH scores. High-resolution ultra-sound was found to confirm UNE in all 7 patients with positive results on EDX, and additionally detected UNE in 3 of 6 patients with negative results on EDX and in 1 patient with equivocal (nonlocalized) EDX testing. All 4 of these additional HRU-detected cases improved clinically and by CSA measurements after surgery. In this series, HRU was superior to EDX testing in the diagnosis of UNE and demonstrated objective improvement in ulnar nerve CSA after successful cubital tunnel release. This modality, which is better tolerated, less costly, and less time-consuming than EDX testing or magnetic resonance imaging, should therefore be considered in the diagnosis and surgical management of UNE, particularly in cases with negative or equivocal results on EDX testing, or when outcomes are suboptimal. [ Orthopedics . 2021;44(5):285–288.]

We evaluated the outcomes of precontoured locking plate fixation with the anconeus flap transolecranon (AFT) approach to treating AO type C2-3 comminuted intra-articular distal humerus (IDH) fractures among active patients. Thirty-six patients (age Orthopedics . 2022;45(6):e326–e334.]

Articular fractures of the distal humerus in adults are challenging fractures requiring adequate surgical exposure for optimum reconstruction. Most commonly, an articular osteotomy of the olecranon is performed, but complications have been reported related to both creating and repairing the articular osteotomy. We describe the use of an extra-articular olecranon osteotomy for approaching articular fractures of the distal humerus. We highlight the surgical steps required to obtain adequate exposure facilitating anatomical reduction, stable fixation, and early range of motion of the elbow joint. This technique can be added to the surgeon's armamentarium for the management of these complex injuries. [ Orthopedics . 2022;45(4):e220–e225.]

Heterotopic ossification (HO), a complication after surgical repair of elbow fractures, can result in pain, decreased range of motion, or complete ankylosis of the joint. This updated systematic review focused on compiling incidence and prevalence rates of HO after surgical repair of various types of elbow fractures. The overall incidence of HO after surgical repair was calculated to be 28.7%, a result comparable with rates in the literature. Further analysis suggested that the odds of having HO may be less after distal humerus fractures than after proximal radius fractures, terrible triad injuries, and elbow fractures/dislocations. [ Orthopedics . 2021;44(1):10–16.]

Acute, major articular bone loss associated with an open fracture is an uncommon injury. These injuries typically occur after high-energy trauma and are challenging to treat. Various approaches to treatment include allografts, prosthetic composite structures, custom implants, and total joint arthroplasty. These treatment options provide a wide array of variability in outcomes, costs, and challenges, especially in young and active patients. Two patients presented to our institution with open elbow injuries that included structural bone loss of the lateral column including the entire capitellar articular surface and a portion of the lateral trochlea. With the limited portions of bone available, the surgical principles for distal humerus fracture of articular repair followed by medial and lateral column restoration were followed. Each patient was treated with repair of the residual remnant of the articular surface. Then, repair of the columns of the distal humerus was performed by using a combination of internal fixation and hinged external fixation. In both cases, a plate was inserted to repair the medial column and a hinged external fixation was applied laterally to protect the lateral column. Immediate motion was allowed and progressed within each patient's tolerance. The lateral, hinged external fixator was removed at 8 weeks after injury and converted to a lateral column plate fixed distally into the lateral portion of the residual trochlea. At follow-up, both patients had radiographic evidence of reconstitution of the lateral column of the distal humerus and were able to return to heavy manual labor. [ Orthopedics . 2022;45(3):e162–e167.]

Treatment of the terrible triad injury of the elbow remains a difficult problem. There are several ways to treat the radial head and coronoid fractures; controversy still exists regarding the best way to treat each. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes of radial head and coronoid fractures treated using current protocols. No differences in functional outcomes were found between the different surgical techniques. There is no superior current protocol for treating these injuries. Surgical treatment should be dictated by fracture type and surgeon experience. [ Orthopedics . 2020;43(6):328–332.]

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is associated with a relatively high incidence of chronic triceps insufficiency, but there is difficulty in treatment. This case series describes reconstruction with Achilles allografts using the keyhole technique in patients with postoperative chronic triceps insufficiency. Fourteen patients who underwent reconstruction for triceps insufficiency after TEA were included in the study. During this procedure, a keyhole-shaped osteotomy was performed on the proximal olecranon, and a fragment of the calcaneal allograft was shaped into a bone plug to fit the olecranon. The clinical outcomes were assessed in all patients 12 months after reconstruction and at last follow-up (range, 13–54 months). After 12 months, patients had a mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score of 84.3 (range, 75–100), and all achieved a marked improvement compared with before reconstruction (mean, 42.7; range, 20–75). Seven, 4, and 3 patients achieved excellent, good, and fair outcomes, respectively. The mean extension peak torque of the operated-on arm was 34.91 Nm (range, 16.3–63.9 Nm), and the percentage of extension peak torque of the operated-on arm to the opposite arm was from 14.5% preoperative to 76.2% 12 months postoperative. This case series suggests that triceps reconstruction with an Achilles tendon using the keyhole technique is a useful treatment option for triceps insufficiency after TEA. [ Orthopedics . 2021;44(4):e498–e502.]

There are conflicting reports regarding the efficacy of Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers following medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR). As advanced baseball metrics have revolutionized the way general managers define pitchers' value, the authors believe that these should be used to measure clinical outcomes after UCLR. All MLB pitchers who underwent UCLR from April 1, 1991, through July 1, 2016, were compiled (N=253). Pitcher demographics and statistics were collected for up to 3 full seasons preceding and following surgery. Data for pitching controls (all MLB [AMLB] pitchers) were also collected (N=14,756). Prior to surgery, pitchers with UCLR were significantly better than the AMLB pitchers in nearly all advanced value-based statistics: higher wins above replacement (WAR; 0.93 vs 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80–1.06), lower fielding independent pitching (FIP; 4.23 vs 4.51; 95% CI, 4.12–4.34), lower expected fielding independent pitching (xFIP; 4.17 vs 4.38; 95% CI, 4.06–4.28), higher win probability added (WPA; 0.21 vs 0.05; 95% CI, 0.1–0.32), and higher leverage index (pLI; 1.03 vs 0.96; 95% CI, 0.99–1.06). Pitchers who returned to play after UCLR demonstrated significantly lower value with worse WAR, FIP, WPA, and pLI ( P Orthopedics . 2019; 42(6):349–354.]

Olecranon fractures are common upper-extremity fractures amenable to various surgical techniques. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate surgical management strategies for olecranon fractures in adult patients. Two investigators independently screened articles from records obtained from MEDLINE, Embase, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases. The authors compared tension-band wiring (TBW) with plate fixation (PF) for the outcomes of complications and hardware removal. Subgroup analyses were conducted comparing randomized controlled trials with observational studies for each outcome. In addition, the authors evaluated novel fixation techniques other than TBW and PF. Twenty-four studies were included in the systematic review and 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis of TBW vs PF. Compared with TBW (n=270), patients who underwent PF (n=369) had a significantly lower complication rate (relative risk, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.36–0.64; P I 2 =16%). Plate fixation (41 of 332) also had less hardware removal compared with TBW (79 of 236; relative risk, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.25–0.50; P I 2 =0%). Subgroup analyses showed no difference when comparing randomized controlled trials with observational studies for the outcomes of complication rate ( P =.45) and hardware removal ( P =.54). Qualitative analysis revealed novel methods of olecranon fixation: a modified cable pin system, tension banding through 2 cannulated screws, olecranon memory connector fixation, and cancellous screw TBW. This meta-analysis revealed significantly lower complication and hardware removal rates for PF compared with TBW. Several novel methods of olecranon fixation may represent viable alternatives. [ Orthopedics . 2019; 42(2):75–82.]

Athletes with medial epicondyle nonunions typically present with medial elbow pain, an elbow flexion contracture, and the inability to compete. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent medial epicondyle excision with ulnar collateral ligament and flexor-pronator mass repair for symptomatic medial epicondyle non-unions. Four patients with a mean age of 15 years (range, 11–19 years) diagnosed with symptomatic medial epicondyle nonunions were evaluated. All were treated with medial epicondyle excision with ulnar collateral ligament and flexor-pronator mass repair. Two of the patients were followed for 12 months, whereas the other 2 patients were followed for 18 months. All patients returned to their preinjury level of sports without difficulty. Two patients with preoperative flexion contracture had residual flexion contractures of 4° and 5° postoperatively, respectively, as measured by a goniometer. All other patients regained full elbow motion equal to that of the contralateral extremity at final follow-up. The patients with preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms had complete resolution postoperatively at a mean follow-up of 18 months. In overhead and upper extremity weight-bearing athletes who have symptomatic medial epicondyle nonunions, fragment excision with flexor-pronator mass repair can yield satisfactory results. [ Orthopedics . 2021;44(3):e337–e342.]

Although reverse shoulder arthroplasty provides excellent clinical results in appropriately selected patients, loss of external and internal rotation may occur. Component selection, design, and placement affect postoperative results. Recent studies considered the effect of humeral component version on functional results. The current study investigated whether humeral stem retroversion affects the outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a retrospective review of a multisurgeon, industry-sponsored, prospectively gathered database of a single reverse shoulder arthroplasty implant. All patients had at least 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, visual analog scale pain score, Short Form-12 Mental and Physical Component scores, range of motion, and internal rotation function, were compared between patients with humeral retroversion of 10° or less (group A) and those with humeral retroversion of 20° or greater (group B). Radiographic outcomes were compared. The analysis included 64 patients (group A, 29 patients; group B, 35 patients). No clinical or statistically significant difference was found in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Both groups showed statistical and clinical improvement vs preoperative scores, with group A averaging 77.8 and group B averaging 79.2 at final follow-up. No differences were found between groups in range of motion or ability to perform tasks that require shoulder internal rotation. Patients can expect good clinical improvement after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. No difference was found in clinical or radiologic outcomes based on humeral component retroversion. Despite the theoretical increase in external rotation when the humeral component is placed closer to native retroversion, the results did not show this effect. [ Orthopedics. 2017; 40(3):179–186.]

Complications following arthroscopy of the elbow for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis are essentially related to the anterior arthroscopic approach. The principal aims of this study were to describe and evaluate the mixed arthroscopic and endoscopic surgical technique using posterolateral approaches exclusively. This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients operated on between 2005 and 2014 for lateral epicondylitis following more than 6 months of ineffective medical treatment. The exploration was arthroscopic via a distal posterolateral portal. The extensor carpi radialis brevis was disinserted via a proximal extra-articular posterolateral endoscopic portal. The postoperative clinical follow-up included subjective (visual analog scale, Nirschl) and objective (Mayo Clinic Elbow Performance Score) evaluations of pain, the time to return to work, the level of satisfaction, complications, and failures. Thirty-seven patients underwent the procedure, including 3 lost to follow-up. Mean±SD follow-up was 32.8±24.7 months. Mean±SD visual analog scale scores were 0.8±0.8 at rest, 2.4±1.3 during everyday activities, and 3.1±1.5 during effort. Mean±SD Mayo Clinic Elbow Evaluation Score was 10.1±1.0 of 12 and mean±SD Mayo Clinic Elbow Performance Score was 91.9±12.5 of 100. Mean±SD Nirschl score was 67.5±9.6 of 80. Mean±SD time to return to work was 2.0±2.6 months. The level of satisfaction was 94.1%. The failure rate was 2.9%, with no neurological lesions. With equivalent or even better results than those already published, this surgical procedure enables the treatment of lateral epicondylitis via posterolateral portals alone, thus avoiding the complications inherent to anterior and medial arthroscopic approaches. [ Orthopedics . 2019; 42(6):e521–e527.]

This study evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of patients who sustained nonreconstructible radial head fractures that subsequently were treated with a metallic press-fit radial head prosthesis (RHP). Nine patients with comminuted radial head fractures were treated with a metallic press-fit RHP; mean follow-up was 38.7 months. The radial head fracture was acute in 6 patients (group A) and chronic in 3 patients (group B). Functional evaluation was assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire. Radiographs were assessed for loosening, radiocapitellar alignment, osteolysis of the radial neck, lucency, periarticular ossifications, and ulnohumeral degeneration. Average flexion and flexion contracture were 133° and 5°, respectively. Average supination and pronation angles were 70° and 73°, respectively. Mean MEPS was 90 (range, 70–100), and elbow performance was excellent in 4 patients, good in 4 patients, and fair in 1 patient. Mean DASH score was 21.9 (range, 0–61). Flexion contracture, forearm rotation arc, and MEPS score were better and the complication rate was lower in group A compared with group B. Centering of the stem was observed on both anteroposterior and lateral radiographs in 6 patients. Lucent lines around the prostheses, stress shielding under the neck of the radius, and ectopic ossification occurred in 5 patients. Three patients had osteoarthritis. Elbow stiffness and ulnar impaction syndrome occurred in 2 patients but only after placement of a secondary RHP. Satisfactory outcomes were obtained using a metallic press-fit RHP for nonreconstructible radial head fractures. [ Orthopedics . 2019; 42(6):e545–e551.]

Olecranon osteotomy allows for improved visualization of the distal humeral articular surface. This study compared the clinical outcomes of 2 methods of olecranon repair following olecranon osteotomy as part of distal humerus fracture repair. This was a retrospective review of distal humerus fractures treated via a transolecranon approach during a 9-year period. In each case, the olecranon osteotomy was fixed with either tension band wiring (TBW) or plate fixation (PF). Patient demographics, injury information, and surgical management were recorded. Measured outcomes included elbow motion, time to osteotomy union, and postoperative complications. Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) scores were obtained for all patients. Forty-eight patients were included. All patients had intra-articular AO type 13-C2 or 13-C3 distal humerus fractures and underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with olecranon osteotomy. Mean documented follow-up was 20.5 months. Twenty-seven patients had fixation of the olecranon osteotomy with TBW, and 21 with PF. Clinically, there were no differences in osteotomy time to union, elbow motion, or MEPI score at final follow-up. However, patients fixed with TBW had greater elbow extension at both 6-month and final follow-up. Complication rates did not differ. Patients undergoing TBW or PF for repair of an olecranon osteotomy following ORIF of intra-articular distal humerus fractures have similar outcomes. Patients undergoing osteotomy PF may experience less terminal elbow extension when compared with those fixed with TBW. Given their similar clinical outcomes, either modality may be considered when selecting a construct for olecranon osteotomy repair as part of comminuted distal humerus fracture repair. [ Orthopedics . 2021;44(1):e107–e113.]

The authors assessed the effects of forearm rotation on the proximity of the radial nerve and medial collateral ligament (MCL) to a proximal and a more distal arthroscopic anterior elbow capsulectomy. Arthroscopy was performed on 10 cadaveric specimens. Sutures were passed lateral to medial at the level of the radiocapitellar joint and at the proximal edge of the annular ligament. Dissection measured the distance to the radial nerve from the lateral starting point and to the MCL from the medial exit point in varying degrees of forearm rotation. The extent of brachialis muscle coverage of the radial nerve was documented. The distance from the starting point to the radial nerve increased in pronation at both levels. The medial extent of the capsulectomy remained a safe distance from the MCL. Brachialis muscle covered the radial nerve at both levels. Pronation increases the capsulectomy safe zone, including more distally, before encountering the radial nerve; the MCL is not at risk. [ Orthopedics . 2020;43(5):e399–e403.]

Malignant tumors of the scapula are rare, and limb salvage surgery after tumor resection is challenging. The authors present a series of 6 patients who were treated by total scapulectomy and reconstruction with a custom-made scapular prosthesis and a constrained reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Postoperative oncologic and functional outcomes were assessed. The mean follow-up was 37 months (range, 9–84 months). Clear surgical margins were achieved in all patients. At the last follow-up, 4 patients showed no evidence of disease and 2 had died of systemic metastatic disease. Although shoulder function was limited, all shoulders were painless and stable and the patients retained satisfactory hand, wrist, and elbow function. [ Orthopedics . 2018; 41(6):e888–e893.]

In this study, the authors investigated the viability of endoscopic bursectomy as a treatment for septic prepatellar and olecranon bursitis. Conventional treatment of septic bursitis consists of aspiration, antibiotics, and rest. When conservative treatment fails, however, surgical intervention is sometimes required to resolve the infection. Typical surgical intervention consists of open bursectomy, in which the infected bursa is excised via an incision in the region of the skin directly above the bursa. The tenuous nature of the blood supply to this region of the skin results in a rather high rate of wound healing issues such as necrosis and wound dehiscence. Recently, endoscopy has been proposed as a less invasive means of bursectomy, although initially it was only recommended for cases of aseptic bursitis. A degree of uncertainty has persisted in the literature as to whether endoscopic bursectomy allows for sufficient debridement of the infected tissue to avoid recurrence of bursitis. The authors report on 27 cases in which endoscopic bursectomy was performed for recalcitrant septic bursitis. Fourteen of these cases were septic olecranon bursitis and 13 were septic prepatellar bursitis. The authors reported good results, with no wound healing complications and only 1 minor recurrence. They also reported much shorter hospital stays than have been reported both for more conservative treatments of septic bursitis and in other case series on endoscopic bursectomy. The authors conclude that endoscopic bursectomy is a superior alternative to open bursectomy for the treatment of recalcitrant septic prepatellar and olecranon bursitis. [ Orthopedics. 2019; 42(4):e381–e384.]

Numerous surgical options have been introduced for the treatment of chronic refractory lateral epicondylitis of the elbow, but it remains unclear which option is superior. The clinical outcomes of an open surgery group and an arthroscopic surgery group were evaluated, and the results of the 2 procedures were compared. From among patients with lateral epicondylitis refractory to 6 months of conservative treatment, 68 patients satisfying study criteria were recruited. Open surgery was performed in 34 cases (group 1), and arthroscopic surgery was performed in 34 cases (group 2). Compared with preoperatively, the 2 groups had significantly improved values for grip strength, range of motion, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score at 12 months postoperatively. Group 1 had significantly greater improvements in grip strength and visual analog scale pain score compared with group 2 ( P =.048 vs P =.006). Group 2 had significantly greater ( P =.045) improvement in pronation compared with group 1. Group 2 returned to work sooner than group 1. On the questionnaire regarding satisfaction with surgery 24 months postoperatively, 4 patients (12%) in group 2 reported dissatisfaction compared with no patients in group 1. Open surgery and arthroscopic surgery both yielded good clinical results. Nonetheless, for patients requiring muscle strength or having severe pain at work, open surgery would be more effective. [ Orthopedics . 2018; 41(4):237–247.]

Indications for elbow arthroscopy are expanding; however, it is uncommon compared with shoulder arthroscopy. Elbow arthroscopy can be complicated by positioning, including the need to obtain specific arm holders required by most operating rooms. Surgery can be performed in the supine, prone, or lateral position. Arm traction allows for distraction of the joint space, full insufflation, and therefore visualization of intra-articular anatomy. This article outlines a new technique using previously available shoulder arthroscopy equipment to avoid increased cost incurred by procuring new, elbow-specific equipment. This technique is performed in the supine position using a hydraulic system and a shoulder 3-point distractor. [ Orthopedics . 2018; 41(1):e158–e160.]

This article describes an extensile surgical exposure to the distal humerus that is suitable for complex fractures involving the articular surface and extending into the humeral diaphysis proximal to the radial nerve. This method combines 2 approaches: olecranon osteotomy and the lateral paratricipital approach. This combination allows an appropriate exposure of both the articular surface and the humeral diaphysis up to the level of the deltoid tuberosity, while maintaining the extensor mechanism unharmed. [ Orthopedics. 2015; 38(7):435–438.]

Elbow fracture-dislocations destabilize the elbow, preventing functional rehabilitation. If left untreated, they commonly result in functional compromise and poor outcomes. The “terrible triad” injury is classically described as a combination of a coronoid process and radial head fractures, as well as a posterolateral elbow dislocation. Surgical treatment to restore stable elbow range of motion has evolved in the past few decades based on increased understanding of elbow biomechanics and the anatomy of these injuries. This article highlights current concepts in the treatment of these complicated injuries. [ Orthopedics. 2014; 37(12):831–837.]

Multiple surgical and nonsurgical treatment options exist for patients with elbow stiffness. Many nonsurgical mobilization bracing options have been implemented to increase elbow range of motion. Three of the main bracing options for these patients are turnbuckle, static progressive stretch, and dynamic bracing. The purpose of this study was to review the current literature on turnbuckle, static progressive stretch, and dynamic bracing to provide information for practitioners and patients regarding which brace is more appropriate to use for elbow stiffness. Specifically, the authors compared the protocol and duration of splint use and changes in range of motion outcomes between static progressive and dynamic brace cohorts. A search of PubMed yielded 8 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Overall, although all 3 bracing options are available for patients, these studies found that, based on the evaluated metrics, the static progressive brace was a markedly superior option for patients with elbow stiffness. The time required to wear the static progressive stretch brace was 13 times less than that for the turnbuckle and 5 times less than that for the dynamic devices. Additionally, the high failure rate (10%) and low success rate (29%) of the dynamic brace, compared with the 63% regaining of functional range of motion in the static progressive stretch group, further highlight the benefits of the static progressive stretch brace. [ Orthopedics. 2018; 41(1):e127–e135.]

Arm wrestling places significant torque on the humeral shaft. A spiral distal humeral shaft fracture is an unusual but significant injury that can result. Of 93 patients who presented between 2009 and 2017 with closed humeral shaft fractures that were managed nonoperatively, 9 sustained the fractures while arm wrestling. Outcomes were compared with those of all other patients with nonoperatively managed humeral shaft fractures sustained through other mechanisms. The Student's t test was used to compare cohorts. All patients had spiral fractures that occurred in the distal one-third of the humerus. All patients went on to achieve radiographic union after a mean of 13.6 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5–15.6). At fracture healing, mean angulation of the humerus seen on the anteroposterior and lateral views was 15.1° (95% CI, 12.0°–18.2°) and 8.9° (95% CI, 3.7°–14.1°), respectively. Mean elbow flexion–extension arc was 141.1° (95% CI, 134.4°–147.8°), with mean forward shoulder elevation of 168.8° (95% CI, 153.3°–184.2°). On comparison of the patients with humeral shaft fractures sustained through arm wrestling with the patients with humeral shaft fractures sustained through other mechanisms, except for earlier time to healing for the former ( P =.05), no significant differences were observed. This represents the first analysis of radiographic and clinical outcomes following these types of fractures. Those who sustain these fractures secondary to the high-torque moment of arm wrestling are not different from those who sustain these fractures secondary to other mechanisms, except for an earlier time to union. This study indicates that nonoperative management of all humeral shaft fractures results in radiographic union with favorable clinical outcomes. [ Orthopedics. 2018; 41(2):e207–e210.]

Distal biceps tendon ruptures are rare injuries that usually occur in middle-aged men. Most of these injuries are repaired acutely to restore preinjury function and strength. There is concern regarding the higher prevalence of certain complications with the double-incision technique. As such, the single-incision technique has also been studied to determine if it may produce superior safety and efficacy. In addition, the point of fixation may be created with either a rigid or a flexible reamer. The authors describe a technique that uses a single-incision cortical fixation achieved with a flexible reamer. [ Orthopedics. 2017; 40(4):e744–e748.]

For acute distal humeral fractures not amenable to open reduction and internal fixation, total elbow arthroplasty has become an established alternative. However, lifelong activity restrictions designed to prevent early mechanical failure make this a poor option for some patients. This has led to a renewed interest in distal humeral hemiarthroplasty. Using modern implants and techniques, distal humeral hemiarthroplasty has shown outcomes comparable to those of total elbow arthroplasty at short- to mid-term follow-up, with an overall higher but different complication rate. Long-term data are needed, but the available literature suggests that distal humeral hemiarthroplasty be considered as another option on the treatment spectrum in select patient populations. [ Orthopedics. 2017; 40(1):13–23.]

Total elbow arthroplasty is the current gold standard of treatment for unreconstructable distal humerus fractures; however, longevity of the implant remains a concern in younger, more active patients. Distal humerus hemiarthroplasty offers an alternative and may allow for more durable results. The authors retrospectively evaluated the short-term clinical outcomes of 10 patients who underwent elbow hemiarthroplasty for distal humerus fractures. This short-term review suggests that distal humerus hemiarthroplasty may be an effective treatment for certain distal humerus fractures. Additional studies must be conducted to further define the role of elbow hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of complex fractures of the distal humerus.

This study evaluated clinical and patient-reported outcomes and return to sport after surgical treatment of medial epicondylitis with suture anchor fixation. Consecutive patients were evaluated after undergoing debridement and suture anchor repair of the flexor-pronator mass for the treatment of medial epicondylitis. Demographic variables, a short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and 10-point pain and satisfaction scales were collected. Ability and time to return to sport after surgery were evaluated, and the relationship between predictor variables and both elbow function and return to sport was investigated. Median age at the time of surgery was 55 years (range, 29–65 years), with median follow-up of 40 months (range, 12–67 months). Median QuickDASH score and OES at final follow-up were 2.3 (range, 0–38.6) and 45 (range, 22–48), respectively. Most patients returned to premorbid sporting activities at a median of 4.5 months (range, 2.5–12 months), whereas 4 patients (14%) reported significant limitations at final follow-up. Older age at the time of surgery was predictive of better QuickDASH score and OES ( P =.05 and P =.02, respectively). Patients who underwent surgery after a shorter duration of symptoms had better outcomes, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (QuickDASH, P =.09; OES, P =.10). Surgical treatment of recalcitrant medial epicondylitis with suture anchor fixation offers good pain relief and patient satisfaction, with little residual disability. Older age at the time of surgery predicts a better outcome. [ Orthopedics. 2016; 39(1):e104–e107.]

Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow is the second most frequent entrapment neuropathy and is considered idiopathic in most patients. However, several anatomic variations, including the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle, have been reported to cause ulnar nerve compression. The anconeus epitrochlearis muscle is a common anatomic variation, with a prevalence of up to 34%, but the clinical diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy of the elbow as a result of this variation is rare, with an unknown prevalence. It is a congenital accessory muscle between the medial humeral epicondyle and the olecranon that covers the posterior aspect of the cubital tunnel and is usually an operative finding, not a preoperative diagnosis. Ulnar neuropathy as a result of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle usually has different characteristics than idiopathic disease, including younger age at onset, more rapid progression with a short duration of symptoms, distinct neurophysiology with velocity drop or conduction block of the ulnar nerve, and edema of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle on magnetic resonance imaging. Neurophysiologic findings in anconeus epitrochlearis–associated ulnar neuropathy indicate subacute onset of symptoms rather than the chronic demyelinating process that is seen in idiopathic ulnar neuropathy. Medial elbow pain may be more exacerbated in these patients rather than the more common sensorial symptoms. This is probably the result of static compression of the nerve and increased cubital tunnel pressure, even when the elbow is in extension. This article describes a case of ulnar nerve entrapment of the elbow in a 28-year-old woman as a result of compression by the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle and includes magnetic resonance imaging findings, surgical correlations, and clinical and neurophysiologic findings. [ Orthopedics. 2016; 39(5):e988–e991.]

A 19-year-old male construction worker presented with an injury to his left upper arm after lifting a heavy pipe. He reported an acute onset of sharp pain followed by swelling, warmth, and weakness with elbow flexion. The diagnosis of a distal biceps tendon rupture was made and elective repair was scheduled. Seventy-two hours later, the patient presented with a spontaneous draining wound on his anterior distal humerus. The wound was draining thick purulent material. The patient underwent surgery for irrigation and debridement of his abscess. Nearly 500 cc of hematoma and purulent fluid were evacuated. A large tear of both the biceps and brachialis muscle bellies were found. Cultures were obtained that revealed the infecting organism to be Streptococcus intermedius . Human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis-C virus testing were negative, and no history, signs, or symptoms of any cause of underlying immunodeficiency were detected. No signs or history of drug use were present. He was discharged home on culture-specific oral antibiotics. At 4-month postoperative follow-up, the patient reported no pain or limitations. He has returned to full duty at his job. Elbow range of motion was measured from 7° to 150° of flexion. Strength of elbow flexion and extension was symmetric to the uninjured side. Pronation and supination of the forearm was symmetric on both sides. He has been released from scheduled follow-up and will be seen again on an as-needed basis.

Although distal humeral fractures are well described in the literature, concomitant distal triceps avulsion has not previously been reported. One population that warrants a high index of suspicion for tendon injury after trauma is patients with renal disease. Clinical tests on such patients may yield equivocal results, and in that setting, magnetic resonance imaging may be useful in the diagnosis of concomitant tendon injury. Postoperative rehabilitation is a challenge considering that the old standard of care for isolated triceps avulsions is several weeks of immobilization and that early motion is recommended for open reduction and internal fixation of distal humeral fractures. More recent literature supports early active-assisted range-of-motion (ROM) elbow exercises after triceps tendon repair, and our case supports those recommendations. A 48-year-old, right-hand-dominant man, who was a living-related kidney transplant recipient 3 years previously, presented with radiographic evidence of an intra-articular distal humeral fracture. The patient was rejecting his kidney at the time of injury and was receiving 50 mg of prednisone daily. The patient underwent open reduction and internal fixation of the distal humeral fracture and concomitant triceps repair. Postoperatively, active-assisted and passive ROM elbow exercises were begun. At 3-year follow-up, the patient had 10° to 120° of motion at the elbow, with full supination and pronation.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of anatomical double-bundle coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction using the coracoacromial (CA) ligament and the conjoined tendon for the treatment of chronic acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation. A retrospective evaluation was performed on 18 patients who underwent an anatomical CC reconstruction using the CA ligament and the conjoined tendon for chronic AC joint dislocation. Patients were treated surgically between April 2007 and January 2012. Mean follow-up was 35.3 months (range, 24–49 months). All patients were evaluated for functional outcomes using the modified University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating scale for chronic AC injury and the Constant-Murley shoulder outcome score. Range of motion and shoulder and elbow strength were also measured. Plain radiographs were taken to evaluate reduction status and CC distance. Mean modified UCLA shoulder rating scale at final follow-up was 18.1 points (range, 13–20 points). No significant difference in mean Constant-Murley scores existed between the injured and contralateral shoulders ( P =.26). At final follow-up, 15 (83.3%) patients had well-maintained reduction and 2 (11.1%) patients had a partial loss of reduction. One other patient had a complete loss of reduction due to a postoperative fall. The CC distance was not significantly different between the injured and contralateral shoulders in the immediate postoperative period ( P =.46) or at final follow-up ( P =.14). One superficial wound infection occurred and was treated with routine wound care. An anatomical double-bundle CC reconstruction using the CA ligament and the conjoined tendon for the treatment of chronic AC joint dislocation is a reliable surgical method with good results. [ Orthopedics. 2015; 38(8):e655–e662.]

Fracture-dislocations of the elbow can be difficult to treat, with unsatisfactory results in some cases. In general, it is preferable to preserve the fractured radial head when possible, but some patients present a unique treatment challenge because of extremely comminuted fractures and bone loss. In these cases, the only options available are radial head prosthesis or allograft. The authors present a case of a 45-year-old man with a fracture-dislocation of the left elbow that was treated with an allograft of the radial head and neck because of extreme comminution of the fracture. There have been a few reports about osteochondral allograft transplantation of the radial head, and they all included traumatic or posttraumatic cases treated with a frozen allograft. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first report on the use of osteochondral allograft in the acute setting for the treatment of a comminuted fracture of the radius involving the whole head and neck. The clinical results were satisfactory at the final follow-up, although mild degenerative changes were present, the screws were coming loose, and the radial head had a slight valgus deformity. Radial head allograft can be an option in selected cases of acute fractures with severe comminution and bone loss that are not amenable to a stable internal fixation; for the young and active patient, who is not the best candidate for radial head resection; or in cases in which radial head arthroplasty is not feasible because of severe bone loss. [ Orthopedics. 2016; 39(6):e1205–e1208.]

Distal humeral epiphyseal separations are rare and treatment strategies are not well defined. The case of a full-term male newborn with a distal humeral epiphyseal separation as the result of a birth trauma was reviewed. A literature review of this topic was undertaken to better understand its occurrence, diagnosis, and treatment options. The patient sustained a distal humeral epiphyseal separation during a vaginal delivery. Deformity and decreased movement in the elbow were observed. Radiographs and subsequent ultrasound were used to make the diagnosis of distal humeral epiphyseal separation. Given the displaced and acute nature of the fracture, a closed reduction and percutaneous pinning was performed. Intraoperatively, this was greatly facilitated by an elbow arthrogram. Immobilization consisted of a posterior plaster splint and swathe. Postoperative follow-up with clinical and radiographic examination showed abundant bony healing and early restoration of function. Ultrasound is useful to confirm the diagnosis of a distal humeral epiphyseal separation for elbow injuries in very young patients. However, once the diagnosis is confirmed, an intraoperative elbow arthrogram helps highlight the fracture fragments and ensures proper reduction and fixation of the fracture. [ Orthopedics. 2016; 39(4):e764–e767.]

The method of using crossed lateral pins is easy and provides adequate fixation in supracondylar elbow fractures in children.

Generalized ligamentous laxity and AP laxity at the knee are associated with ACL tears and may explain part of the gender disparity in injury occurrence.

External fixation of supracondylar fractures in children is a simple and versatile method that combines the advantages of traction and surgical fixation.

Joint pain accompanied by erythema, swelling, and decreased range of motion is concerning for septic arthritis and typically warrants joint aspiration. The synovial fluid white blood cell count plays a central role in the decision-making process regarding these patients. Traditional teaching holds that a cell count greater than 50,000 white blood cells/µL is likely caused by infection and therefore warrants either operative intervention or serial aspiration. This report describes 2 patients with extremely high synovial fluid white blood cell counts in the absence of infection. Case 1 involved a 59-year-old man who presented to the emergency department with sudden onset of atraumatic left elbow pain and was found to have a white blood cell count of 168,500 white blood cells/µL on joint aspiration and innumerable monosodium urate crystals. The patient ultimately improved with treatment with oral prednisone, avoiding operative intervention. Case 2 involved a 69-year-old man who presented to the emergency department with acute onset of atraumatic left knee pain. On arthrocentesis, the patient had a cell count of 500,000 white blood cells/µL and was therefore taken to the operating room for arthroscopic irrigation and debridement. Final analysis of the synovial fluid showed monosodium urate crystals and negative culture findings. These cases illustrate the highest synovial fluid white blood cell count reported in patients with gout and highlight the potential difficulty in differentiating between acute gout and septic arthritis in the setting of markedly elevated white blood cell count.

Coronoid fractures are not easily accessed surgically. Despite the majority of cases of coronoid fracture responding to conservative treatment, limited range of motion or instability can develop after such treatment. Therefore, unstable coronoid fractures should be treated surgically to improve clinical outcome. Several approaches and treatment methods have been used for coronoid fractures. The authors report the clinical characteristics, results, and outcomes of 10 cases of Regan-Morrey Type I, Type II, and Type III coronoid fractures treated using a novel arthroscopic technique. [ Orthopedics. 2015; 38(12):742–746.]

This study evaluates the exposure of the distal humerus articular surface obtained using a triceps hemi-peel approach versus the triceps-flexor carpi ulnaris (TRIFCU) approach. Twelve cadaveric upper extremity specimens were dissected using a lateral-to-medial hemi-peel modification of the TRIFCU approach to the elbow. After completing the hemi-peel exposure, the visible border of the articular surface was marked with a permanent ink pen. The dissection was continued to complete a standard TRIFCU approach, and the visible border of the exposure was again marked. The elbow was disarticulated, and calibrated digital images were taken to quantify the humeral surface area exposed through each approach. During both approaches, the surgeon’s ability to visualize the intertrochlear groove, medial crista anterior crest, medial crista posterior crest, anterior capitulum, and posterior capitulum was recorded. No difference was found in the surgeons’ ability to identify the 5 designated anatomic landmarks using the hemi-peel versus the TRIFCU approach. The TRIFCU exposed an average of 6.68 cm 2 of the trochlear articular surface, whereas the hemi-peel approach exposed an average of 5.93 cm 2 . The average difference between the exposures was 0.75 cm 2 ( P

Ulnar collateral ligament insufficiency has been shown to result in changes in contact pressure and contact area in the posteromedial elbow. This study used new digital technology to assess the effect of a complete ulnar collateral ligament tear on ulnohumeral contact area, contact pressure, and valgus laxity throughout the throwing motion. Nine elbow cadaveric specimens were tested at 90° and 30° of elbow flexion to simulate the late cocking/early acceleration and deceleration phases of throwing, respectively. A digital sensor was placed in the posteromedial elbow. Each specimen was tested with valgus torque of 2.5 Nm with the anterior band of the ulnar collateral ligament intact and transected. A camera-based motion analysis system was used to measure valgus inclination of the forearm with the applied torque. At 90° of elbow flexion, mean contact area decreased significantly (107.9 mm 2 intact vs 84.9 mm 2 transected, P =.05) and average maximum contact pressure increased significantly (457.6 kPa intact vs 548.6 kPa transected, P 2 intact vs 65.8 mm 2 transected, P =.01) and average maximum contact pressure increased nonsignificantly (365.9 kPa intact vs 450.7 kPa transected, P =.08). Valgus laxity increased significantly at elbow flexion of 90° (1.1° intact vs 3.3° transected, P =.01) and 30° (1.0° intact vs 1.7° transected, P =.05). Ulnar collateral ligament insufficiency was associated with significant changes in contact area, contact pressure, and valgus laxity during both relative flexion (late cocking/early acceleration phase) and relative extension (deceleration phase) moments during the throwing motion arc. [ Orthopedics. 2015; 38(7):e547–e551.]

Historically, the published literature on “terrible triad” injuries has shown a high rate of unacceptable results. The use of systematic treatment protocols may improve functional outcome. The authors performed a retrospective study of all patients aged 18 years or older who underwent surgical treatment for “terrible triad” elbow fracture dislocation at their institution over a period 7 years. Surgical treatment involved fixation or replacement of the radial head, repair of the anterior capsule or coronoid fracture in most cases, and repair of the lateral collateral ligament. Outcomes included grip strength, range of motion, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire score, and a visual analog score for pain as well as radiographic assessment of arthritis, maintenance of reduction, and development of heterotopic ossification. Eighteen patients were identified and 11 enrolled. Seven patients had suture fixation of the coronoid fragment and anterior capsule, 2 had screw fixation, and 2 had no repair of the coronoid. The radial head was replaced in 9 patients and repaired in 1, and a fracture fragment was excised in another. The average follow-up was 38 months. The average arc of motion of the injured elbow was 112° and that of the contralateral elbow was 142°. The average DASH score was 19.7 (scale, 0–100). The average visual analog score for pain was 2.2 (scale, 0–10). No patients had recurrent elbow instability. Three patients underwent further surgical procedures, all for loss of motion. The authors concluded that a systematic approach to the fixation of “terrible triad” elbow fracture dislocations can provide predictable elbow stability and functional range of motion in the medium term.

During surgery for elbow fracture, wires and screws crossing the elbow from posterior to anterior place the brachial and ulnar arteries at risk for inadvertent penetration. The authors’ goal was to define the sagittal proximity of the brachial and ulnar arteries to the proximal ulna throughout an arc of elbow motion using dynamic fluoroscopy. The brachial artery was injected with barium in 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows. Sagittal fluoroscopic images were obtained at elbow flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°. Two measurements were obtained at each flexion angle: (1) the distance between the coronoid tip and the brachial artery and (2) the distance between the coronoid base and the ulnar artery. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare mean distances for each flexion angle within each measurement group. A coronal image identified the mediolateral course of the brachial artery. The distance from the coronoid tip to the brachial artery significantly increased with increasing flexion from 0° to 60° ( P P Orthopedics. 2015; 38(4):e253–e256.]

Terrible triad elbow injuries, consisting of fractures of the radial head and coronoid with ulnohumeral dislocation, are challenging to treat. They require a comprehensive understanding of the complex anatomy of the elbow to effectively treat all of the pathology and create a stable, congruent joint. The authors present a case of a terrible triad injury with avulsion of the triceps and flexor-pronator mass after a low-energy fall in a young patient. Although most terrible triad fracture-dislocations can be successfully treated with coronoid fixation, radial head fixation or replacement, and repair of the lateral collateral ligament complex, this case involved a completely circumferential injury to the elbow. The coronoid and anterior capsule were disrupted anteriorly, the radial head and lateral collateral ligament complex were disrupted laterally, the triceps was disrupted posteriorly, and the flexor-pronator mass was disrupted medially. Although the authors prefer to address most terrible triad injuries through a lateral approach, they suspected a circumferential injury preoperatively and elected to use a single posterior incision to address all of the pathology conveniently. This injury required treatment of all disrupted structures, because the elbow remained unstable until the triceps and flexor-pronator mass avulsions were ultimately repaired. With any elbow fracture-dislocation, surgeons should look for evidence of additional injuries that do not fit the commonly described patterns, because they may necessitate modifications to the treatment plan. Given the relatively common complications of stiffness and instability despite modern surgical techniques, additional injuries may further compromise functional outcomes unless they are addressed properly. [ Orthopedics. 2015; 38(2):e143–e146.]

Distal biceps ruptures are uncommon injuries that comprise approximately 3% of all biceps pathology. This injury is most commonly seen in 40- to 60-year-old men, and the mechanism of injury involves a forceful extension movement to a flexed elbow. Without surgical intervention, patients are left with measurable weakness in elbow flexion and supination as well as a cosmetic deformity that often leaves them dissatisfied. Consequently, early surgical repair is advocated for physically active individuals. A variety of surgical approaches and fixation devices are currently used for distal biceps repair. The single-incision cortical button repair for distal biceps avulsions has become popular since Bain introduced the technique in 2000. The advantage of the cortical button biceps repair technique is the significantly higher failure strength than either the 2-incision technique or the suture anchor repair. The initial repair strength of the cortical button technique allows immediate active elbow range of motion and accelerated rehabilitation. Additionally, the single-incision anterior approach is less invasive than the 2-incision biceps repair and results in a lower incidence of heterotopic ossification. One disadvantage of this approach, however, is the risk of injury to the posterior interosseous nerve. The authors report a case in which the posterior interosseous nerve was incarcerated between the cortical button and the radius during acute distal biceps repair, resulting in complete posterior interosseus nerve palsy. This case report details the surgery leading to the nerve palsy and the subsequent nerve exploration that identified the cause of the nerve palsy. Recommendations are made on how to avoid this complication during distal biceps tendon repairs. [ Orthopedics. 2015; 38(1):e68–e71.]