Search

Perineural invasion (PNI) occurs in 2% to 6% of cutaneous head and neck basal and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and is associated with mid-face location, recurrent tumors, high histologic grade, and increasing tumor size. Patients may be asymptomatic with PNI appreciated on pathologic examination of the surgical specimen (microscopic), or may present with cranial nerve (CN) deficits (clinical). The V and VII CNs are most commonly involved. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be obtained to detect and define the extent of PNI; computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (UGFNAC) may assist with detecting or excluding regional lymph node metastases. Patients with apparently resectable cancers undergo surgery, usually followed by postoperative radiotherapy (RT). Patients with unresectable cancers are treated with definitive RT. Moreover, RT may be considered if significant functional or cosmetic impairment is expected after surgical treatment. The 5-year outcomes after treatment for clinically unsuspected microscopic compared with clinical PNI are: local control, 80% and 55%; cause-specific survival, 75% and 65%; and overall survival, 55% and 50%, respectively. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 complications is higher after treatment for clinical PNI versus microscopic PNI; approximately 35% compared with 15%, respectively. Proton beam RT may be used to reduce the risk of late complications by reducing RT dose to the visual apparatus and central nervous system (CNS)., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Paragangliomas of the head and neck are uncommon, slow-growing, multicentric and are usually benign. Ever since familial paragangliomas were first described a genetic explanation for their existence has been sought. An international collaboration finally elucidated the SDHB, SDHC and SDHD genes for three paraganglioma syndromes (PGL 4, 3, 1). A familial origin should be suspected if other family members have paraganglioma, paragangliomas are multiple, the patient is young or the patient has a vagal paraganglioma. Once familial disease is suspected the best initial screening method is by genetic testing of the patient in question. If genetic testing detects PGL 1, 3 or 4 mutations then the patient's siblings and children should be tested. All genotypically positive patients should be followed periodically as soon as detected. Surveillance is best performed with periodic radionuclide imaging and by directed magnetic resonance imaging. The purpose of surveillance is early detection and consequently earlier treatment. Abundant evidence exists that the risk of complications from surgical intervention increases with increasing tumor size. If tumors are detected and eradicated before they become large, then younger patients can be spared the dysphagia, dysphonia, dysarthria and stroke that have plagued patients undergoing surgery for these tumors.

Spinal accessory nerve (SAN) dysfunction and related shoulder disability are common consequences of supraomohyoid neck dissection (SOHND). Nerve dysfunction is usually attributed to excessive nerve traction or devascularization during clearance of the lymph nodes posterior and superior to the SAN (sublevel IIB). The need for routine dissection of this sublevel with elective neck dissection has recently been questioned. This review article discusses whether preserving sublevel IIB lymph nodes is justified in elective SOHND for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity. A review of the literature was conducted on studies of sublevel IIB dissection in elective SOHND for SCC of the oral cavity. Only two studies have prospectively investigated the incidence of lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically N0 SCC of the oral cavity. Data from these two prospective pathologic and molecular analyses of neck dissection specimens, including 122 patients with N0 oral cancer, revealed 7.3% with positive neck nodes at sublevel IIB for oral cancer in general, and 12% for tongue cancer in particular. When considering the merits of preservation of sublevel IIB, the benefit of preservation of SAN function has to be weighed against potentially reduced oncologic control.

This review analyzes the development of head and neck oncology as outlined in medical history articles. A systematic literature survey was conducted with the search engines "Google Scholar" and "PubMed" and the retrieved publications were cross-referenced. In addition, books and, when possible, original sources were consulted. While most of the material was obtained from publications from the modern era reviewing historical data, some of the information was derived from original source material. The obtained articles on the history of cancer were then analyzed for details on head and neck oncology. The cradle of oncology was located in ancient Egypt and Greece. The search showed that the first tumors treated in the head and neck were either cutaneous malignancies or cancers on the mucosal surfaces of the oral cavity. The origin, diagnosis and treatment of more deeply situated tumors of the larynx and hypopharynx remained obscure for many centuries. The medieval age brought little progress to medicine in general, and in head and neck oncology in particular, due to religious concerns. Renaissance medicine was characterized by advances in medicine and oncology made by systematic dissection studies of normal and pathologic anatomy. The 19th and 20th century reflect the development of head and neck oncology in the era of science based medicine. Almost all of our current understanding of head and neck oncology, our diagnostic methods and treatment strategies have been developed in these two centuries. The analysis showed that many oncologic problems, which occupy our minds today, were also concerns of our medical ancestors.

Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the head and neck is an uncommon tumor with a potential for exhibiting highly aggressive behavior. When these tumors arise in the head and neck region, they appear to have a predilection for the maxillofacial skeleton; less often, they may involve other soft tissue sites in the head and neck. The diagnosis is challenging and may be assisted by molecular pathologic techniques when only limited tissue is available for analysis. Management is primarily surgical. Although adjuvant radiation appears to convey some benefit by reducing tumor bulk when these lesions have extended beyond bony confines, there is no evidence to suggest that this is associated with improved outcome. Chemotherapy does not appear to be effective in the limited experience documented thus far. Patients with complete local control following resection should be followed closely for development of distant metastasis, which signifies a worse clinical outcome. Future effective therapy may be found in the identification of molecular targets responsive to adjuvant chemotherapy or biologic modifiers.