Search

To assess efficacy and safety of sarilumab, a human anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, for treatment of posterior segment noninfectious uveitis (NIU).Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study.Fifty-eight patients (eyes) with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis.Eyes received treatment every 2 weeks for 16 weeks with subcutaneous sarilumab 200 mg or placebo.The primary end point was the proportion of patients with ≥2-step reduction in vitreous haze (VH) on the Miami scale or with a reduction of systemic corticosteroids (prednisolone or equivalent) to a dose of10 mg/day at week 16. Primary end point was based on VH evaluation by a central reading center. Investigator evaluation of VH was a prespecified, planned secondary analysis.At week 16, proportion of patients taking sarilumab or placebo with ≥2-step reduction in VH or corticosteroid dose10 mg/day was 46.1% vs. 30.0% (P = 0.2354) based on central reading center assessment of VH and 64.0% vs. 35.0% (P = 0.0372) based on investigator assessment of VH, respectively. In the subgroup of eyes with VH grade ≥2 at baseline, the mean VH reduction from baseline to week 16 was significantly greater with sarilumab vs. placebo regardless of assessment by the central reading center (-2.1 [n = 11] vs. -1.7 [n = 3], respectively; P = 0.0255) or investigator (-2.5 [n = 19] vs. -1.2 [n = 11], respectively; P = 0.0170). The mean best-corrected visual acuity gain from baseline to week 16 was greater with sarilumab vs. placebo in the overall population (8.9 vs. 3.6 letters, respectively; P = 0.0333) and in the subgroup of eyes with central subfield thickness (CST) ≥300 μm at baseline (12.2 [n = 13] vs. 2.1 [n = 7] letters, respectively; P = 0.0517). Corresponding changes in CST were -46.8 vs. +2.6 μm (P = 0.0683) in the overall population and -112.5 [n = 13] vs. -1.8 [n = 6] μm (P = 0.1317) in the subgroup of eyes with CST ≥300 μm at baseline, respectively. The most common ocular adverse events were worsening of uveitis (0 [placebo] and 3 [sarilumab] patients) and retinal infiltrates (1 [placebo] and 2 [sarilumab] patients).Subcutaneous sarilumab may provide clinical benefits in the management of NIU of the posterior segment, especially in eyes with uveitic macular edema.

To compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) with macular grid laser photocoagulation for the treatment of macular edema after branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).The VIBRANT study was a double-masked, active-controlled, randomized, phase III trial.Treatment-naïve eyes with macular edema after BRVO were included in the study if the occlusion occurred within 12 months and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was between ≤73 and ≥24 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (20/40-20/320 Snellen equivalent).Eyes (1 eye per patient) received either IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (n=91) from baseline to week 20 or grid laser (n=92) at baseline with a single grid laser rescue treatment, if needed, from weeks 12 through 20.The primary outcome measure was the proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 ETDRS letters from baseline BCVA at week 24. Secondary end points included mean change from baseline BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT) at week 24.The proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 ETDRS letters from baseline at week 24 was 52.7% in the IAI group compared with 26.7% in the laser group (P=0.0003). The mean improvement from baseline BCVA at week 24 was 17.0 ETDRS letters in the IAI group and 6.9 ETDRS letters in the laser group (P0.0001). The mean reduction in CRT from baseline at week 24 was 280.5 μm in the IAI group and 128.0 μm in the laser group (P0.0001). Traumatic cataract in an IAI patient was the only ocular serious adverse event (SAE) that occurred. There were no cases of intraocular inflammation or endophthalmitis. The incidence of nonocular SAEs was 8.8% in the IAI group and 9.8% in the laser group. One Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration-defined event of nonfatal stroke (1.1%) and 1 death (1.1%) due to pneumonia occurred during the 24 weeks of the study, both in patients in the laser group.Monthly IAI provided significantly greater visual benefit and reduction in CRT at 24 weeks than grid laser photocoagulation in eyes with macular edema after BRVO.