1. The Bidirectional Relationship between Vision and Cognition
- Author
-
Benjamin K.J. Tan, Tien Y Wong, Alfred Tau Liang Gan, Preeti Gupta, Varshini Varadaraj, Greta Rait, Christopher Chen, Felipe A. Medeiros, Sigrid Mueller-Schotte, Carlos A. Reyes-Ortiz, Willa D. Brenowitz, Virginie Nael, Jacobijn Gussekloo, Kaavya Narasimhalu, Allen T C Lee, Ryan E. K. Man, Ecosse L. Lamoureux, Tai Anh Vu, Yih Chung Tham, Stella Trompet, Bonnielin K. Swenor, Eva K Fenwick, Ching-Yu Cheng, Kam Chun Ho, and Joan M. O'Brien
- Subjects
0303 health sciences ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Odds ratio ,Publication bias ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,3. Good health ,03 medical and health sciences ,Ophthalmology ,0302 clinical medicine ,Quality of life ,Internal medicine ,Meta-analysis ,030221 ophthalmology & optometry ,medicine ,Dementia ,Observational study ,Risk factor ,business ,030304 developmental biology - Abstract
Topic Visual impairment (VI) and cognitive impairment (CIM) are prevalent age-related conditions that impose substantial burden on the society. Findings on the hypothesized bidirectional association of VI and CIM remains equivocal. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine this bidirectional relationship. Clinical Relevance Sixty percent risk of CIM has not been well elucidated in the literature. A bidirectional relationship between VI and CIM may support the development of strategies for early detection and management of risk factors for both conditions in older people. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central registers were searched systematically for observational studies, published from inception until April 6, 2020, in adults 40 years of age or older reporting objectively measured VI and CIM assessment using clinically validated cognitive screening tests or diagnostic evaluation. Meta-analyses on cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between VI and CIM outcomes (any CIM assessed using screening tests and clinically diagnosed dementia) were examined. Random effect models were used to generate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We also examined study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity. Results Forty studies were included (n = 47 913 570). Meta-analyses confirmed that persons with VI were more likely to have CIM, with significantly higher odds of: (1) any CIM (cross-sectional: OR, 2.38 [95% CI, 1.84–3.07]; longitudinal: OR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.46–1.89]) and (2) clinically diagnosed dementia (cross-sectional: OR, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.48–4.01]; longitudinal: OR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.37–3.21]) compared with persons without VI. Significant heterogeneity was explained partially by differences in age, sex, and follow-up duration. Also, some evidence suggested that individuals with CIM, relative to cognitively intact persons, were more likely to have VI, with most articles (8/9 [89%]) reporting significantly positive associations; however, meta-analyses on this association could not be conducted because of insufficient data. Discussion Overall, our work suggests that VI is a risk factor of CIM, although further work is needed to confirm the association of CIM as a risk factor for VI. Strategies for early detection and management of both conditions in older people may minimize individual clinical and public health consequences.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF