Search

Background: This case report explores the relationship between genetics and phenotypic variability in autosomal dominant vitreoretinochoroidopathy (ADVIRC). The study focuses on a case presenting a novel mutation in the BEST1 gene and its phenotype in the case's relatives, shedding light on the structural and functional intricacies underlying this rare ophthalmologic disorder., Case Presentation: A 33-year-old female presented for consultation with a history of bilateral retinal damage accompanied by a complaint of decreased visual acuity, progressive visual field deficit, and night blindness over the past year. Ophthalmic examination revealed a distinctive phenotype, including fibrillar vitreous, pigmented cells, and atrophic hyperpigmented retina in the periphery which was suggestive of a diagnosis of ADVIRC. Genetic testing revealed a heterozygous c.1101-1 G>T variant in BEST1 , a novel splice site mutation. Functional analysis confirmed its impact on pre-mRNA splicing, resulting in an in-frame deletion (p(Ser367_Asn579del)). Family investigation revealed varying degrees of ophthalmologic impairment in the patient's mother and half-sister, both carrying the same mutation., Conclusions: This case report provides the first clinical description of the c.1101-1 G>T mutation in the BEST1 gene associated with ADVIRC. The presence of intrafamilial variability, as evidenced by the differing clinical features observed in the index case and her half-sister, suggests the potential involvement of mechanisms influencing phenotype expression. Abbreviation : ADVIRC : autosomal dominant vitreoretinochoroidopathy; RNA : ribonucleic acid; RPE : retinal pigment epithelium.

Background : Posterior pole staphylomata (PSS) is an outward bulging of ocular wall, rarely reported in association with inherited retinal degenerations. Patients and methods : We report a large French family of Jewish ancestry with a peculiar form of dominant retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and posterior pole staphyloma (PPS). Eight members were clinically and genetically examined. Results : All affected members complained of night blindness from early childhood and their ERGs were extinguished in the first decade of life. Seven out of eight presented PPS on fundus examination and SD-OCT. The youngest patient did not present PPS at 11 months of age, but the signs of posterior pole bowing became evident at age 8 years. There was no association between the presence of PPS and refraction. Patients with PPS were either hyperopic or myopic, but all have a high with-the-rule astigmatism. A myopic shift was observed for all of them at follow-up. In this family, the disease segregated with the c.886A>G mutation in RHO gene. Conclusion : A PPS development was observed in initially non-myopic patients of a family with unusually severe dominant RP. The PPS concerned only the area with relatively preserved outer retinal layers (outer nuclear layer and ellipsoid zone). How the outer retina could guide choroid and scleral remodelling remains unclear.