Search

Indonesia is a rapidly growing county with over 262 million inhabitants, but among highly populated countries it has one of the lowest concentrations of eye care providers. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a program implemented in South Sulawesi, Indonesia that trained school teachers to conduct vision screenings, organized in-school evaluations by opticians, and provided free eyeglasses to school children with refractive error (RE). Schoolteachers across 6 districts in South Sulawesi were trained to screen children with possible RE for subsequent evaluation by opticians. All costs associated with designing and implementing the program (administration, training personnel, labor, service delivery, etc.) were assessed. Expenditures and outcomes data were utilized to calculate the cost per disability-adjusted-life-year (DALY) averted using both 2010 and 2016 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) weights. 521 teachers screened 41,212 students across 172 schools in South Sulawesi. 4,506 (10.9%) students failed screening, 2,652 were seen by optometrists, and 2,038 received glasses. The total program cost was US$97,380, with glasses (39.6%) and labor (23.3%) accounting for the two biggest expenditures. In districts with school-based refraction services, the costs per student screened, refracted, and receiving glasses were $2.57, $31.33, and $41.40, respectively; costs were $2.04, $59.80, and $73.22 when district services were instead provided centrally. The estimated cost per DALY averted was US$89.04 based on GBD 2010 weights. Treating children with correctable RE in limited resource settings can be done cost-effectively through a school-based model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Community Eye Clinics (CEC) increase accessibility of specialist ophthalmic services in the community, reducing demand for tertiary eye services. This paper aims to evaluate the impact of CEC on first-visit referrals from Hougang Polyclinic (HOU) to Tan Tock Seng Hospital Ophthalmology Specialist Outpatient Clinic (SOC). A retrospective analysis was performed on first-visit referrals from Hougang Polyclinic (HOU) to Tan Tock Seng Hospital Ophthalmology Specialist Outpatient Clinic (SOC) over a similar 3-months period before and after the introduction of CEC in August 2018 (1 January to 31 March in 2018 and 2019, respectively). Data pertaining to patients' presenting complaints, referral reasons, final diagnoses, follow-up plans, and need for ophthalmic intervention were obtained. We included 978 patients in our study. There was a 27.5% reduction in the number of first-visit referrals seen at SOC after the establishment of CEC. Patients were more likely to be referred on to sub-specialty eye clinics (10.8% vs. 12.9%, p= p =.304) and receive more ophthalmic interventions (15% vs. 16.3%, p =.066) than prior to CEC. The CEC provides greater accessibility to eye care within the community. Optometrists are upskilled to manage patients with stable eye conditions, whilst eye specialists can provide timely care to the SOC for patients with more severe eye conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To assess differences in eye care utilization by vision difficulty (VD), diabetes status, and sociodemographic characteristics for American adults. The analysis pooled cross-sectional data from the National Health Interview Survey (2010–2018) from US adults ≥ 18 years. The outcome measure was eye care utilization in the past year. The primary independent variable included four groups: no VD or diabetes, only diabetes, only VD, and diabetes and VD. VD was defined as self-reported difficulty seeing even with glasses or contacts. Diabetic status was defined as ever receiving this diagnosis by a health professional. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined associations between eye care utilization, VD, diabetic status, and sociodemographic characteristics. Of the 284,599 adults included in this study, the majority were female (55%), White (73%), and non-Hispanic (84%). In regression analysis, as compared to adults without diabetes or VD, adults with both diabetes and VD had the greatest utilization (OR = 2.49, 99% CI = 2.18–2.85). Females had higher utilization than men (OR = 1.45, 99% CI = 1.41–1.50). Higher levels of education was associated with greater utilization (OR = 1.82, 99% CI = 1.72–1.92). White and American Indian adults without diabetes had higher utilization compared to other races (OR = 1.17, 99% CI = 1.12–1.24, 0.98–1.39). While adults with VD and diabetes are better connected to eye care, significant eye care disparities persist for marginalized groups in the U.S. Identifying and understanding these disparities and eliminating barriers to care is critical to better support all patient populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We compared recruitment of participants at high risk for glaucoma and other eye diseases in three community-based studies designed to improve access to eye care in underserved populations in New York City, Alabama, and Michigan. We used (1) participant data collected at enrollment (e.g. demographic, medical conditions, healthcare access, and method of hearing about study) and (2) interviews with study staff to assess effective recruitment strategies in enrolling people at high risk for eye disease. We analyzed participant data using descriptive statistics and interview data using content analysis to categorize responses to questions. In these community-based studies, all sites recruited greater proportions of populations with increased risk of eye disease compared to their estimates in the US population. High-risk characteristics varied based on the setting (i.e. Federally Qualified Health Centers or affordable housing buildings). Older adults represented 35% to 57%; 43% to 56% identified as Black; 1% to 40% as Hispanic/Latino; 20% to 42% reported a family history of glaucoma; 32% to 61% reported diabetes; and 50% to 67% reported high blood pressure. Social risk factors for under-utilization of eye care due to poverty included that 43% to 70% of participants had high school or lower education; 16% to 40% were employed; and 7% and 31% had no health insurance. From a qualitative perspective, active, personalized, culturally sensitive methods were most effective in recruiting participants. Implementing eye disease detection interventions in community-based settings facilitated recruiting individuals at high risk for glaucoma and other eye diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of our study is to understand the factors associated with non-adherence to the physician's follow-up advice by persons with glaucoma. We use a four-year panel dataset containing demographic, clinical, and intervention details and doctor's advised follow-up date for a random sample of 2,622 glaucoma patients from an Indian tertiary eye care hospital. We model this unique "advised follow-up date" in multivariate logistic regressions to identify factors associated with patients' coming early or late as against on-time. An OLS regression also examines an association between delayed follow-up and declining visual acuity. Demographic variables such as age, gender, distance to hospital, IOP, and visual acuity were not associated with delayed adherence to follow-up. Patients advised to review within 2 months (p <.001), paying patients (p <.001), and those habituated to routine follow-up (diabetes patients) (p <.01) are less likely to delay care-seeking. Patients are more likely to come on-time in visits immediately after clinical interventions relative to later ones (p <.001). Our second analysis reveals the presence of cataract and the very first post-surgery visit as factors influencing patients to come early. Our third analysis reveals that a higher proportion of delayed visits had resulted in worsening of vision in the glaucoma-affected eye. Our results suggest that active counselling by doctors, especially for routine follow-up visits, can help in better follow-up adherence and prevention of glaucoma-related visual impairment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and main causes of blindness and visual impairment in population aged 50 years and older in Armenia using Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) methodology. The study team randomly selected 50 clusters (each consisting of 50 people) from all 11 regions of Armenia. Data on participants' demographics, presenting visual acuity, pinhole visual acuity, principal cause of presenting visual acuity, spectacle coverage, uncorrected refractive error (URE), and presbyopia were collected using the RAAB survey form. Four teams of trained eye care professionals completed data collection in 2019. Overall, 2,258 people of 50 years and older participated in the study. The age- and gender- adjusted prevalence of bilateral blindness, severe and moderate visual impairment were 1.5% (95% CI: 1.0–2.1), 1.6% (95% CI: 1.0–2.2) and 6.6% (95% CI: 5.5–7.7), respectively. The main causes of blindness were cataract (43.9%) and glaucoma (17.1%). About 54.6% and 35.3% of participants had URE and uncorrected presbyopia, respectively. The prevalence of bilateral blindness and functional low vision increased with age and was the highest in participants 80 years and older. The rate of bilateral blindness was comparable with findings from countries that share similar background and confirmed that untreated cataract was the main cause of blindness. Given that cataract blindness is avoidable, strategies should be developed aiming to further increase the volume and quality of cataract care in Armenia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate health disparities in racial and ethnic minorities with dry eye. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, socioeconomic factors, treatments, and objective dry eye parameters. Race/ethnicity was self-reported as delineated by the U.S. Census. The reference group comprised of randomly selected White patients, with number equal to the largest minority group. The study included 465 patients (157 Black, 157 White, 85 Asian, and 66 Hispanic). Compared to White (3.2%) patients, larger proportion of minorities used Medicaid or lacked health insurance (Black 8.3%, P =.054; Asian 10.6%, P =.019; Hispanic 18.2%, P <.001). Black and Hispanic patients had lower estimated median household income than Whites (White $98,472, Black $75,554, P <.001; Asian $105,503, P =.088; Hispanic $86,839, P =.030). Prior to presentation, fewer minority patients received prescription treatments or procedures (White 61.8%; Black 30.6%, P <.001; Asian 43.5%, P =.006; Hispanic 43.9%, P =.014). Although at baseline visit minorities had worse mean conjunctival (White, 1.7; Black 2.2, P =.136, Asian 2.4, P =.022; Hispanic 2.6, P =.005) and corneal staining scores (White, 1.6; Black 2.5, P <.001; Asian 2.3, P =.003; Hispanic 2.4, P =.001), no differences were noted at final visit. Minorities presented with worse objective dry eye parameters, and less prior dry eye care. Income and health care access may not fully explain the observed undertreatment at presentation. Differential management by eye care providers and patient attitudes warrant further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeMethodsResultsConclusionTo the best of our knowledge, implementation of artificial intelligence (AI)-based vision screening in community health fair settings has not been previously studied. This prospective cohort study explored the incorporation of AI in a community health fair setting to improve access to eyecare.Vision screening was implemented during a community health fair event using an AI-based non-mydriatic fundus camera. In addition, a questionnaire was provided to survey the various barriers to eyecare and assess eye health literacy.A total of 53 individuals were screened at this event. Notably, about 88% of participants had follow-up appointments scheduled accordingly with an approximate 62% attendance rate. The most reported barrier to eyecare was lack of health insurance followed by transportation.The addition of AI-based vision screening in community health fairs may ultimately help improve access to eye care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Poor eye-health knowledge and health literacy are pervasive, contributing to worse outcomes. This study aims to examine short- and long-term eye-health knowledge retention following eye-health education interventions in adults. Vision Detroit was an outreach vision screening program that integrated a 5-Point Teaching Intervention (5PTI), at a Southwest Community Center (SW-CC) from 2015–2017. The 5PTI consists of eye-health learning points developed to verbally educate patients. During vision screenings, eye-health knowledge tests were administered before and after 5PTI (Test 1 and Test 2, respectively). In 2016, Community Eye-Health Education Interventions (CHEI) were initiated at the SW-CC. During CHEI, bilingual healthcare students taught voluntary SW-CC members the 5PTI learning points, regardless of participant interest to attend future screenings. CHEI sessions occurred on separate dates prior to vision screening events. Test 1 and Test 2 scores were compared for all participants. Test 1 scores were compared for those who underwent CHEI prior to vision screening (CHEI positive) versus those who did not (CHEI negative). Two-hundred-seventeen adult patients met inclusion criteria, with 75.8% women, 82.6% Hispanic, mean age 50.4 ± 16.2 years, 74.6% had high school or less education, and 49.2% had health insurance. Test 1 to Test 2 scores improved after 5PTI (71.2 ± 26.4% vs. 97.2 ± 9.9%, p <.00001). Forty-eight participants attended CHEI and subsequent vision screening. Test 1 scores were higher among those CHEI positive versus CHEI negative (81.1 ± 2.1% vs. 68.3 ± 3.4%, p =.0027). Simple eye-health education interventions, delivered during vision screenings and via community-based education, can improve eye-health knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Explore door-to-door eye screening in India as a model to reach school age children in need of eye care, especially during school closures due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Children between 5 and 18 years were screened in an urban-slum of Delhi from September 2020 to March 2021. Screening included capturing ocular complaints, visual acuity and conducting a torchlight examination. Children with any eye-related complaints, gross abnormality or a LogMAR acuity of more than 0.2 in either eye were referred to the nearby vision centre. Data were disaggregated by gender and age group. Reporting after referral and proportion of true positives referrals were used to assess the model. 32,857 children were screened. 55% were boys. Only 917 children (2.8%) had previous eye examinations. 1814 (5.5%) children were referred. Overall compliance rate amongst those referred was 59% (1070 of 1814) and compliance was significantly higher (72%) amongst those referred with poor vision as compared to those with only ocular morbidities (38%). Overall compliance was significantly higher amongst older age group (64% vs 50%) and amongst girls than boys (61% vs 56%). 3.9% children were detected with refractive error (RE) and 2.5% with uncorrected RE which was significantly higher in girls and in older age group. Of 1070 children reporting after referral, 85% had confirmed diagnosis for RE or other ocular pathology. Door-to-door screening had good referral compliance and positive predictive value. We recommend this model as a supplement to school screening especially in regions with low enrolment and high absenteeism in schools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In response to the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) World report on vision, the WHO is developing a Package of Eye Care Interventions (PECI) to support the integration of eye care into health systems within countries. This study was done to systematically review clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) related to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) to provide evidence-based recommendations. All AMD-related CPGs published between 2010 and 2020 were reviewed and evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. Of 3778 CPGs identified, 48 underwent full-text screening and eight underwent quality appraisal. Five National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE, UK) guidelines for AMD were finally selected for data extraction. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment was strongly recommended for advanced, active neovascular AMD based on high-quality evidence. Photodynamic therapy and laser photocoagulation were not recommended as an adjunct to anti-VEGF therapy as first-line treatment for AMD. Recommendations on other interventions, including epiretinal brachytherapy, miniature lens system implantation, and limited macular translocation, were weak and evidence mostly came from low-quality case series studies. Hence these interventions were recommended to be used only with special arrangements or research. Existing evidence on treating geographic atrophy was limited, an implantable miniature telescope might be an effective intervention to improve vision but was still under investigation. Current CPGs recommend anti-VEGF therapy for patients with late active neovascular AMD, while other interventions should be used with caution and further researches are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate factors associated with prolonged length of stay and high cost among pediatric hospitalizations with a primary ophthalmic diagnosis. This retrospective, cross-sectional study utilized data on pediatric admissions with a primary ophthalmic diagnosis from the multicenter 2016 Kids' Inpatient Database. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for demographic, hospital, and admission characteristics were used to evaluate factors associated with prolonged stay and high cost, defined as exceeding the 75th percentile (>4 days and $12,642, respectively). An estimated 6,811 pediatric hospitalizations with a primary ophthalmic diagnosis in the United States in 2016 were included. On adjusted analysis, a prolonged length of stay was more likely with Medicaid (vs. private insurance, OR = 1.19, 95% CI: [1.02, 1.40], p =.03), non-trauma (vs. trauma, OR = 2.77, 95% CI: [2.12, 3.63], p <.001) and urban teaching hospitals (vs. rural, OR = 3.48, 95% CI: [1.04, 11.69], p =.04). A high cost of stay was more likely with higher income levels (Quartile 3 vs. 1, OR = 1.30, 95% CI: [1.02, 1.67], p =.04; Quartile 4 vs. 1, OR = 1.49, 95% CI: [1.08, 2.05], p =.02), private insurance (vs. Medicaid, OR = 1.26, 95% CI: [1.04, 1.53], p =.02), Western hospitals (vs. South, OR = 2.74, 95% CI: [1.83, 4.12], p <.001), and trauma (vs. non-trauma, OR = 3.29, 95% CI: [2.57, 4.21], p <.001). Children and young adults had higher odds of prolonged stay, while adolescents and young adults had higher odds of high cost compared to toddlers (p <.05 for all). Additional work addressing the factors associated with higher resource utilization may help promote the delivery of quality inpatient pediatric eye care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

School eye screening is a crucial strategy in the elimination of childhood blindness because of its ability to reach out to children who are otherwise inaccessible to eye care needs. Comprehensive screening programs are recommended and are beneficial, but the economic aspects of such models remain to be understood. This study aimed to analyse the cost of a comprehensive school eye screening model while utilizing optometrists and optometry students. This cross-sectional study was conducted for 295 schools screened in the academic year 2018–2019. The analysis was performed from the service provider's perspective including only the direct costs. Financial records were used for cost estimates. The outcome measures were cost per school and child, predictors for the cost, DALYs averted, cost of childhood blindness, and Benefit–Cost Ratio. A total of 65 094 children underwent screening from 295 schools. The median (IQR) cost per school and child for screening was $29.65 (29.65–44.34) and $0.66 (0.32–1.13). The regression model predicted that the cost of screening was dependent on school strength, number of screening personnel, distance of the schools, and deliverables. With the interventions to improve compliance, 14686.30 DALYs have been averted. Loss of productivity due to childhood blindness was estimated to be $339070.83. Screening for colour vision also had a Benefit–Cost ratio of greater than one. Cost of screening was low and the benefits were high while utilising optometrist and optometry students along with a comprehensive screening protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To develop a simple but more precise model to calculate potential annual productivity losses due to blindness and moderate and severe vision impairment (MSVI) at the national, regional, and global level. Productivity loss was defined as the loss of minimum wage/Gross National Income per capita (GNI) incurred by people aged 50–64 years with blindness or MSVI, who were not able to work or worked with reduced earnings in 2020. We developed a global list of minimum wage data from on-line sources. All other model data were sourced from international, standardised, and open-access databases. For blindness, the total productivity loss (not working) incurred by 64%–90% of the affected population was summed up with partial productivity loss, defined as 10%–36% of the affected population earning one-third of that of the sighted population. For MSVI, the total productivity loss for 30%–55% of the affected population was summed with the partial productivity loss, defined as 45%–70% of the affected population having 35% reduced earnings. The costs of blindness and MSVI were summed to obtain the cost of combined vision loss. The global cost of vision loss based on minimum wage was US$160-US$216.32 billion for 2020. The global cost of vision loss using GNI was US$449.36-US$584.66 billion. A parsimonious model that considers minimum wage and GNI potentially lost due to blindness and MSVI can be used for eye care programming planning and advocacy at the national, regional, and global level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Keywords: Health care utilization; racial disparities; Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders; National Health Interview Survey; health care access EN Health care utilization racial disparities Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders National Health Interview Survey health care access 203 207 5 03/08/23 20230401 NES 230401 Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders (NHPIs) are a poorly studied population in the United States (US) with high rates of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease that place them at risk for vision loss.[1] Most major guidelines recommend dilated eye examinations at regular intervals - depending on patient age and other risk factors - to identify and treat ocular disease, especially among populations at higher risk for vision loss.[2] However, there is a paucity of research on eye care utilization by NHPIs due to their smaller population size and frequent aggregation with Asian Americans.[3] This study identified the rate and correlates of eye care utilization among NHPIs in the US. NHPIs had lower rates of eye care utilization than their non-NHPI counterparts across most ages, both sexes, all income levels, and all insurance statuses. Families with higher income can afford to spend more on eye care.[7] Older adults have a higher incidence of eye disease and vision impairment, which may increase their eye care utilization.[7] However, even higher income, older and vision impaired NHPIs had lower eye care utilization rates than their non-NHPI counterparts. [Extracted from the article]

To explore individual and community factors associated with adherence to physician recommended urgent eye visits via a tele-triage system during the COVID-19 pandemic. We retrospectively reviewed acute visit requests and medical exam data between April 6, 2020 and June 6, 2020. Patient demographics and adherence to visit were examined. Census tract level community characteristics from the U.S. Census Bureau and zip code level COVID-19 related death data from the Cook County Medical Examiner's Office were appended to each geocoded patient address. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, and logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the effects of individual and community variables on adherence to visit. Of 229 patients recommended an urgent visit, 216 had matching criteria on chart review, and 192 (88.9%) adhered to their visit. No difference in adherence was found based on individual characteristics including: age (p =.24), gender (p =.94), race (p =.56), insurance (p =.28), nor new versus established patient status (p =.20). However, individuals who did not adhere were more likely to reside in neighborhoods with a greater proportion of Blacks (59.4% vs. 33.4%; p =.03), greater unemployment rates (17.5% vs. 10.7%; p <.01), and greater cumulative deaths from COVID-19 (56 vs. 31; p =.01). Unemployment rate continued to be statistically significant after controlling for race and cumulative deaths from COVID-19 (p =.04). We found that as community unemployment rate increases, adherence to urgent eye visits decreases, after controlling for relevant neighborhood characteristics. Unemployment rates were highest in predominantly Black neighborhoods early in the pandemic, which may have contributed to existing racial disparities in eye care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The key predictor variable for each model was whether the participant reported diagnosis of macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, or cataracts. In this study, we included adults (age>=40) who indicated having a previous diagnosis of ARMD, DR, glaucoma, or cataracts. [Extracted from the article]

To describe the socioeconomic profile, awareness level and reasons for the delay in accessing timely eye care for cataract surgery in patients of lens-induced glaucoma (LIG). This cross-sectional observational study included all patients with LIG who presented to a tertiary eye care centre in central rural India between March 2019 to February 2020. Data were collected through a questionnaire. Out of the 731 patients included in the study, the majority were females (69.36%). The mean age of the patients at presentation was 62.66 ± 10.37 years. Only a few participants, 193 (26.40%) were aware of LIG. Lower socioeconomic profile, older age, female gender and illiteracy were found to be strongly associated with awareness about LIG (p <.001). Patients waiting for the winter season (58.27%) to get operated was the major reason for delayed presentation to the hospital. Other reasons for the delayed presentation were – need not felt (feeling that intervention was not necessary) due to good vision in other eye (14.36%), financial issues (11.63%), long travelling distance (7.11%), no caretaker (6.89%), medical illness (1.78%) and fear of surgery (0.55%). Delayed reporting for eye healthcare in patients of LIG is found to be multifactorial. Most patients preferred waiting for the winter season to get their eyes operated, which throws light on the mindset and ignorance of the patients in this part of central rural India. We further emphasize on strengthening the education and counseling efforts in the community to enable patients to access services in a timely fashion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine the prevalence of cataract and its relationship with some determinants in individuals above 60 years. Of 3792 subjects that were invited, 3310 participated in the study (response rate = 87.31%). All subjects underwent full optometric, slit lamp, and fundoscopic examinations. Then, their lenses were evaluated according to the World Health Organization cataract grading system after pupil dilation. Age- and sex-standardized prevalence with 95% confidence interval (CI) of nuclear, cortical, posterior subcapsular cataracts (PSC), any type cataract, and all lens change was 53.09% (49.80 to 56.35), 23.02% (20.87 to 25.32), 5.57% (4.62 to 6.70), 58.78% (55.65 to 61.83), and 72.49% (70.14 to 74.71), respectively. Any type, nuclear, cortical, and PSC cataracts, had a positive association with age and an inverse association with education. Moreover, the prevalence of cortical and PSC cataract had an inverse association with economic status. Among all variables, age was the strongest determinant for cataract and its subtype. This study found a higher prevalence of cataract compared to some previous studies such that about two-thirds of the geriatric population had cataract in the past or at the time of the study. Considering the association of cataract with variables such as economic status and education level, it seems that training and increased awareness and knowledge of the elderly population regarding the importance of eye care by physicians plays an important role in reducing the burden of cataract. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study analyzes the factors associated with eye care service utilization among Peruvians 50 years of age and older, measured as self-reporting of having undergone examination of visual acuity during the last 12 months. A secondary analysis of the 2019 Demographic and Family Health Survey (ENDES, for its acronym in Spanish) database was carried out. We estimated the weighted proportion of adults 50 years of age and older that reported having undergone a visual acuity examination in the previous 12 months and the frequency according to the variables of interest. Crude (PR) and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) of eye care service utilization were constructed using generalized linear models. Approximately 28.8% of Peruvians 50 years of age and older underwent a visual acuity examination in the previous 12 months. Having a higher education (aPR = 1.79; 95% CI: 1.33–2.40), health insurance such as EsSalud (aPR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.28–1.87), a previous diagnosis of cataracts (aPR = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.67–2.09) and being part of the richest wealth quintile (aPR = 2.36; 95% CI: 1.74–3.20) were associated with greater utilization of eye care services, while living in the jungle was associated with a lower likelihood of utilization of these services. The unequal distribution of health resources within the territory and socioeconomic gaps among the population could explain our findings. Further efforts are needed to fulfill the eye health needs of the Peruvian population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To explore stakeholders' perceptions of a school-based vision programme (SBVP). We conducted 20 focus groups with 105 parents and teachers at schools in Baltimore, MD, that participated in a SBVP. Facilitators used a semi-structured interview guide to discuss participants' perceptions of the SBVP. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using inductive thematic analysis. Participant perceptions fell into three categories: benefits of school-based eye care, limitations of school-based eye care, and observation of impact. The majority of participants had positive comments about the programme; benefits included convenience (location, time, and cost), the comprehensive nature of the programme, the quality of the eyeglasses and ability to receive replacements, and a positive screening/exam experience. Limitations of programme impact were related to communication and organisation, the time to receive the glasses, missed instructional time, and uncertainty about screenings. Observations of impact included academic and classroom improvements, as well as visual and other health improvements. Parents and teachers reported mostly positive perceptions regarding the SBVP. Their appreciation for the convenience underscores that location, cost, time, and comprehensive services are crucial aspects for implementing a successful programme. To maximize impact, programs must also implement robust communication campaigns that integrate into the schools' workflow to help parents and teachers stay engaged in the process from start to finish. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cataract surgery is the most common surgery performed in the European Union (EU) annually. Analysis of Google Trends (GT) data could give European eye care providers useful information regarding interest in cataract surgery and potential barriers making patients unwilling to undergo surgery. Data were collected using GT for cataract surgery and the two most related queries, for each of 14 included countries from January 2004 to December 2018. Case volumes were extracted from the Eurostat report for the calendar years 2004–2018. The most related queries analysis demonstrated surgery outcomes, founding issues and understanding of the disease as potential factors for patients considering cataract surgery. Trend analysis showed that the total search volumes for "cataract surgery" gradually increased over the study period. Also, for "cataract", "after cataract surgery", "cataract surgery NHF" rising trends were revealed. Trends found for "cataract surgery price" and "cataract surgery complications" were inconclusive. Univariate linear regression analysis demonstrated statistically significant correlations between average annual search volumes of "cataract surgery" and the annual volume of cataract surgeries performed in included countries, according to Eurostat data (R2 = 0.889, p = <.001). In addition, univariate linear regression analyses revealed similar, statistically significant correlation for each the most related queries. To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first and the only analysis of GT data in the ophthalmology literature to date. This study highlights this potentially powerful data set for European eye care providers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vision loss and blindness are among the top ten disabilities in the United States, yet access and utilization of eye care remains low. Vision Detroit aimed to address eye-care disparities via community-based screenings. By investigating burden of eye disease and barriers to eye-care utilization in an underserved urban community, we may direct efforts to improve access. Twenty-three screenings were conducted from March 2015-November 2017. Patient information gathered at screenings were demographics, medical and social history, eye exam/referral history, insurance status, primary care physician (PCP) status, and patient-perceived eye-care barriers. Three-hundred-eighty patients were screened, 42% African American and 51% Hispanic. Average age was 53 ± 16.4 years, 70% reported vision problems, 50% reported over two years of vision problems, and average habitual visual acuity in best-seeing eye was 20/37. Eye-care underutilization was reported in 61% of type-2 diabetics. Older age and PCP recommendations/referrals were associated with increased utilization in all patients. Insurance was the most common barrier (53%); of the 55% insured, 31% reported financial barriers. Employed patients were more likely than unemployed to report a time barrier (odds ratio = 1.76, 95% confidence interval 1.03–3.01). Those with high school or less education reported "unaware of need", "unsure where to go", "transportation", and "insurance" as barriers more often. Visual burden was pervasive, yet access was suboptimal. Financial, logistical, and awareness barriers were common. PCP referral and older age were associated with increased utilization. Those less educated reported more barriers, highlighting the need to address fiscal concerns and eye-health education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate the prevalence, causes and risk factors for vision impairment (VI) among the elderly population in Telangana State, India. A population-based cross-sectional study were conducted in four districts. All participants had eye examinations including visual acuity assessment for distance and near, anterior segment examination and non-mydriatic fundus imaging by trained personnel. VI was defined as presenting visual acuity worse than 6/18 in the better eye. Individuals aged ≥60 years were considered as elderly. In total, 11,238/12,150 (92.5%) individuals aged ≥40 years were examined. Of this, the dataset of 3,640 individuals (32.4%) elderly participants was used for analysis. Among the 3,640 participants, 53.1% were women and 78.1% had no education. The mean age of the participants was 67.8 years (standard deviation: 7 years; range: 60 to 102 years). The age and gender-adjusted prevalence of VI was 32.1% (95% CI: 29.5–34.8). On multivariable analysis, the odds of VI was significantly higher in older age groups, and among those with no education. Gender and district of residence were not associated with the prevalence of VI. Cataract (54.8%) was the leading cause of VI followed by uncorrected refractive errors (37.6%). VI was common and largely avoidable in the elderly population in Telangana state in India. Elderly centric eye care including screening for vision loss, provision of cataract surgery and spectacles can be used as strategies to address VI in the elderly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To estimate prevalence and causes of avoidable blindness among people ≥50 years and to assess willingness to pay (WTP) for cataract surgery in tribal region of south Gujarat, India. A cross-sectional population based survey was conducted with 44 randomly selected clusters each having 50 people aged ≥50 years selected by probability proportional to size of sampling. Adults identified with cataract causing visual loss (<6/18) in any eye were interviewed to assess their WTP for surgery. Total of 2137 examined out of 2200 people enumerated (response rate 97.1%). The prevalence of blindness (Presenting Visual Acuity (PVA)<3/60 in better eye) was 2.23% (95% CI: 2.95%–1.51%). Cataract was main cause of blindness (67.3%) followed by corneal scarring (8.2%). Major barrier to cataract surgery cited by bilaterally blind people was lack of escort to the surgical facility (34.3%). Cataract surgical coverage (CSC) was 84.9% (eyes) and 92% (persons). Of the 492 people interviewed to assess WTP for their surgery, only 36.4% people were willing to pay. The tribal population has a high poverty profile in India. Within this group, cataract remains the main treatable cause of blindness despite a high CSC. Assessment of barriers suggested that a well-coordinated outreach programme with free transport facilities to the surgical facility is required along with strategies to improve accessibility and prioritising cataract blind in the community. One-third of people were willing to pay for their surgeries implying that cross subsidization or tier system could be feasible for eye care programme sustainability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the effect of a mobile-based screening programme on eye care utilization in Iran. In this cluster randomized community trial, a representative sample of residents aged≥50 years from urban and rural areas in four districts in Tehran province were enrolled. The clusters were randomly assigned to one of the three parallel arms; the mHealth arm with digital data collection, vision screening test and retina evaluation using an integrated mobile application, the conventional arm with manual data collection and screening tests using Snellen chart and Fundus photography at the local primary healthcare facility, and the control arm with manual data collection without screening tests. The main outcome measure was eye care utilization which was defined as at least one visit to an optometrist or ophthalmologist. Of 3312 eligible individuals, 2520 (76.1%) participated. In the first 3 months after the screening programme, eye care utilization was higher among those who were referred by the mHealth method (35.6% 95%CI: 31.1–40.4%) compared to those referred by the conventional method (32.7%, 95%CI: 27.5–38.2%) and to those observed in the control arm (4.5%, 95%CI: 3.2–6.0). Eye care utilization improved (OR = 1.5, 95%CI: 1.2–1.9) among the referred people after the screening programme compared to the utilization before this programme; however, this improvement was significantly higher in the mHealth method (OR: 1.7, 95%CI: 1.2–2.4) compared to the conventional method (OR: 1.2, 95%CI: 0.8–1.8). The mobile-based screening programme can significantly improve eye care utilization at the community level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim was to identify severity factors useful in the initial management of patients with acute ocular exposure while considering both categories of products involved and circumstances of exposure. A retrospective study over a one-year period that included patients who benefited from the poison center services for eye exposure to a chemical substance. Within a year, 1582 patients were identified. The sex ratio (M/F) was 0.8. The mean age was 28.5 ± 20.3 years. Among children, those under 4 years represented the most significant age category (n = 277; 50.1%). Exposure to chemicals were mild (n = 1342, 84.8%). Adults over 65 years appeared to be more likely to have severe ocular damage (OR: 4.75; [2.26; 9.98]). Unintentional exposures were the most frequent (n = 1548; 97.8%). Ocular exposure primarily occurred at home (n = 937; 59.2%), and at the workplace (n = 396; 25%) which was associated with a higher risk of severe injury (OR: 2.93 [2.16; 3.97]). Cleaning products accounted for 31.2% of exposure cases (n = 457). Exposure to disinfectants is a risk factor of more severe injuries (OR: 1.48 [1.002; 2.19] p =.0472) whereas pH and severity of injuries were not statistically significant. Our study showed the very wide variety of products involved in ocular exposures. Clinicians should pay attention to factors associated with severe injury, including young and old age, work-related injury, substances such as disinfectants, in addition to previously known factors such as acids and bases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The integration of primary eyecare into existing primary healthcare systems requires simple yet effective tools that do not overburden the grass-root level worker. The objective of this study was to test the accuracy of a questionnaire-based tool administered by trained community-based rehabilitation volunteers (CBRVs) in identifying persons with visual disability, proportions accessing referral pathway and barriers to uptake of eyecare services. CBRVs working in the urban-slum service area of a teaching hospital were trained in administering a questionnaire-based tool derived from the World Health Organization (WHO) "Training in the community for people with disabilities" to a responsible adult member of the household. Post-training, they screened and referred adults with perceived visual problems. This tool was tested against two reference standards: (i) history of visual disability elicited by ophthalmologist; (ii) pre-set visual acuity and diagnosis criteria. Ten CBRVs screened 950 individuals of whom 805 (84.7%) were examined by an optometrist and ophthalmologist. Sensitivity and specificity of this method were 75% (95% CI 72–78%), 95.8% (95% CI 94–98%) respectively, using history and 60.2% (95% CI 57–63%), 91.8% (95% CI 90–94%) using clinical criteria as reference standard. Referral pathway was used by 91/221 (41.2%) referred individuals. The commonest barriers to accessing eye care were 'did not feel the need' (32.2%) and 'busy with work/household responsibilities' (30.2%). This questionnaire-based tool administered by grass-root level health workers to a responsible adult member of the family may be a promising screening method for identification and appropriate referral of persons with visual disability in the community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To identify the impact the COVID-19 lockdown had on the presentation and management of sight-threatening ocular trauma. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of all patients who presented to the Ophthalmology department of Royal Hallamshire Hospital Sheffield with serious ocular trauma during the COVID-19 lockdown period was performed. Data on mechanism of injury and date of injury, presentation, and surgical repair were collected. This process was repeated for the same dates in the previous 5 years for comparison. Results: During the COVID-19 lockdown period, we saw 10 cases of serious ocular trauma (4 globe ruptures, 4 full-thickness lid lacerations, and 2 intra-ocular foreign bodies). This is 3.33 times the average number of cases over the previous 5 years. The delay between injury and presentation rose to 1.1 days compared to 0.33 days pre-COVID; however, the time taken between presentation to surgery was only slightly affected (12 hours in 2020 compared to 11.38 hours pre-COVID). Conclusion: During the COVID-19 lockdown, the number of serious ocular trauma cases was more than three times the average of the previous 5 years. This increase is partially due to more DIY injuries as people stayed at home, but also surprisingly an increase in falls. There did appear to be a longer delay between injury and presentation, suggesting that patients were reluctant to come into hospital during the pandemic. Surgery was performed within 12 hours on average for both groups, reassuringly indicating that sight-saving surgery was not delayed despite extraordinary circumstances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Epidemiological information is expected to be used to develop key aspects of eye care such as to control and minimise the impact of diseases, to allocate resources, to monitor public health actions, to determine the best treatment options and to forecast the consequence of diseases in populations. Epidemiological studies are expected to provide information about the prevalence and/or incidence of eye diseases or conditions. To determine prevalence is necessary to perform a cross-sectional screening of the population at risk to ascertain the number of cases. The aim of this review is to describe and evaluate capture-recapture methods (or models) to ascertaining the number of individuals with a disease (e.g. diabetic retinopathy) or condition (e.g. vision impairment) in the population. The review covers the fundamental aspects of capture-recapture methods that would enable non-experts in epidemiology to use it in ophthalmic studies. The review provides information about theoretical aspects of the method with examples of studies in ophthalmology in which it has been used. We also provide a problem/solution approach for limitations arising from the lists obtained from registers or other reliable sources. We concluded that capture-recapture models can be considered reliable to estimate the total number of cases with eye conditions using incomplete information from registers. Accordingly, the method may be used to maintain updated epidemiological information about eye conditions helping to tackle the lack of surveillance information in many regions of the globe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To estimate the number of patients accessing eye care with low vision (LV) at a large multi-site ophthalmology institute who utilize low vision rehabilitation (LVR) services and compare their characteristics to individuals who do not utilize LVR services. This is an electronic health record-based retrospective chart analysis. Patients with LV were identified as having at least one encounter in 2014 where the best visual acuity (VA) in the better-seeing eye was worse than 20/40. Utilization of LVR services across 9 clinic locations was evaluated. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine patient characteristics associated with service utilization. Of the 7,752 LV patients, 1,585 (20%) utilized LVR services over the 17-month period. Those utilizing LVR were more likely to have VA between 20/60 and 20/200 or between 20/200 and 20/500 than non-users (P <.001). The highest LVR utilization rates were in patients evaluated in retina (23%), glaucoma (22%), and neuro-ophthalmology (18%) subspecialties. Patients seen at clinic locations with onsite LVR services available were more likely to utilize services (odds ratio [OR] ranged from 2.69 [95% confidence interval, 95% CI: 1.63–4.44] to 4.94 [95% CI: 2.12–11.48] across location categories), as were patients who had evidence of fluctuations in VA measurements (OR = 3.33, 95% CI: 2.89–3.84). Patients are more likely to utilize services when VA is moderately to severely impaired, VA fluctuations are present, or when LVR services are provided at the same location where other ophthalmic services are obtained. These estimates are important for developing interventions aimed at improving LVR utilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To examine factors decreasing participation in school-based vision programs from parent and teacher perspectives. Methods: We conducted 41 semi-structured focus groups (20 parent groups, 21 teacher/staff groups), at 10 Baltimore and 11 Chicago public elementary and middle schools offering school-based vision programs. School-based vision programs provided vision screening, eye exams, and eyeglasses if needed. Focus groups ranged in size from 2–9 participants (median = 5). Sessions were recorded, transcribed, and coded through an iterative process to develop themes using inductive analysis. Results: Ninety parents and 117 teachers/staff participated. Participants identified five major factors decreasing participation in school-based vision programs: (1) challenges with the consent form, including distribution, collection, and literacy and language barriers; (2) having existing eye care; (3) misunderstandings about the program, especially related to cost and insurance; (4) difficulty raising parental awareness of the program; and (5) certain attitudes towards vision, eye care, and school-based programs, including low prioritization of eye care, mistrust of the program, fear of sharing private information, not believing their child needs glasses, and reluctance accepting 'subsidized' services. Conclusion: Parents and teachers identified important structural barriers to participation (i.e., consent form challenges and low parental awareness) and specific reasons for non-participation (i.e., attitudes, misunderstanding of the program, existing eye care) in school-based vision programs. Effective strategies are needed to facilitate return of consent forms and promote awareness of school-based vision programs among parents. Programs should also target services towards those currently without access to eye care and increase awareness about paediatric vision needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To estimate the prevalence and associated factors of AMD in an Iranian population in 2014. Methods: In this population-based cross-sectional study, a total of 2975 Iranian residents (age: ≥50 years) from the urban and rural areas of Gilan province were included. The prevalence of different grades of AMD was determined using the International Age-Related Maculopathy Epidemiological Study Group grading system. Results: Of 2975 eligible individuals, 2587 (87.0%) subjects participated and 2275 (76.5%) subjects (62.6 ± 8.8 years old) had gradable fundus photographs. Age- and sex-standardized prevalence of early and late AMD based on the 2016 Iran census were 13.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6–16.2) and 0.7% (95% CI, 0.4–1.3), respectively. In multivariate analysis, each decade increase in age was associated with the adjusted odds of any (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.31, 95% CI, 1.09–1.56; P =.0031), early (AOR = 1.27, 95% CI, 1.06–1.53; P =.012) and late AMD (AOR = 2.39, 95% CI, 1.08–5.28; P =.031). Hyperopia was identified to be less frequent in late AMD (AOR = 0.20, 95% CI, 0.04–0.80; P =.024). No significant association was found between AMD and sex, smoking, outdoor working, diabetes, hypertension, pseudophakia, hyperlipidemia and myopia. Conclusion: Gilan Eye Study demonstrated the first estimate of age-specific AMD prevalence in Iran being compatible with other WHO regions. With the expected increase in the life expectancy and aging of Iranians, the number of people affected by AMD will be increasing in future. Healthcare policy makers should be advised to provide more efficient eye care services and preventive strategies in this regard. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Vision 2020 and the Global Action Plan 2013–2019 prioritise primary eye care (PEC) as an important component of reducing avoidable blindness. Studies in sub-Saharan Africa have demonstrated that current PEC provision is poor. There has been no evaluation of the current practice of PEC among primary health care workers (PHCWs) in Nepal. Methods: A mixed methods descriptive cross-sectional study with semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) was carried out in Eastern Nepal. Government employed PHCWs working at health posts in three districts were invited to take part in a PEC knowledge and skills assessment. Each health post was assessed for ophthalmic equipment and medications. Three focus group discussions and eight semi-structured interviews were carried out with community ophthalmic assistants, PHCWs and a district health manager. Results: 107 PHCWs in 35 health posts took part in the quantitative study. Only 8.4% had received eye care training. 27.1% PHCWs could diagnose a corneal ulcer, 83.2% conjunctivitis, 75.7% cataract and 54.2% ophthalmia neonatorum. Only 14.0% could measure visual acuity, and 5.7% of HPs had a vision chart. Ophthalmic assistants described their concern for the low level of PEC at health posts. PHCWs were keen to receive training and highlighted the need for greater government support in the provision of eye care services. Conclusion: PEC knowledge and skills among PHCWs in eastern Nepal is inadequate to provide quality PEC services. There is a pressing need for PEC training in the region, provision of ophthalmic equipment and greater government support for eye care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Reliable data on eye care needs in Kyrgyzstan are not readily available. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in persons aged 50 and above in the southwest of Kyrgyzstan and to support the Ministry of Health (MoH) in the planning of eye care in the region. Methods: A population-based survey was conducted in three states (Oblast) in the southwest region of Kyrgyzstan. Sixty clusters of 50 people aged 50 years and older were selected by probability proportionate to size sampling. Ethical approval was obtained from the MoH, consent was obtained from each participant. Results: A total number of 3,000 persons aged 50 and older were sampled. Among these 2,897 (95.9%) were examined. The prevalence of bilateral blindness was 1.7% [95%CI: 1.1–2.4]. Cataract (43.3%) was the main cause of blindness, followed by glaucoma (30%), age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) (8.3%), other posterior segment diseases (6.7%) and non-trachomatous corneal opacities (5%). The prevalence of blindness and visual impairment increased strongly with age. The cataract surgical coverage in blind persons was 59%. Conclusion: Cataract and glaucoma were the major causes of blindness and visual impairment in persons 50 and above. The majority of the causes (85%) were avoidable, with 45% (cataract and uncorrected aphakia) treatable, 6.7% (corneal opacity and phthisis) preventable by primary health care/eye care services and 33.3% (cataract surgical complications, glaucoma) preventable by specialized ophthalmic services. The data suggest that an expansion of eye care services to reduce avoidable blindness is needed, as ageing will lead to an increase in older people at risk and a higher demand for eye care in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To modify the Western Canada Waiting List Project (WCWLP) cataract prioritization criteria into measurement instruments for assessing appropriateness and prioritization emphasizing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and examining reliability. Methods: A modified Delphi process was conducted using two rounds of online surveys and a face-to-face meeting. A panel of eye care experts rated the relevancy of criteria on a 5-point scale. Patient narratives highlighted the patient experience. A G-theory framework was used to assess inter- and intra-rater agreement using the criteria. Results: Nine Ophthalmologists, three Optometrists, and one General Practitioner participated in the modified Delphi process. Consensus to include/exclude was reached on all criteria. Seventeen criteria were included and 16 were excluded. The most significant changes were related to the categorization of comorbidities and expansion of HRQoL questions. The overall reliability was good (ϕ = 0.852). Conclusion: The WCWLP was modified to include appropriateness and to better reflect HRQoL. Having achieved consensus and demonstrated reliability of the criteria, the next step is to estimate weights for criteria and to validate against patient health outcomes data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the distribution of cataract surgery performed by ophthalmologists in China. Methods: A cross-sectional study was designed to investigate nationwide ophthalmological resources and capacity for cataract surgery in China⁠—The 2014 China National Eye Care Capacity and Resource Survey. Data analyzed in this report included regional distribution, urban-rural comparison, levels and types of medical institutions, and cataract surgery types and volume per surgeon. In China, only ophthalmologists at or above the level of attending are eligible to perform cataract surgery independently, so the ability of cataract surgery for ophthalmologists at or above the level of attending is analyzed in the current study. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: 36,333 ophthalmologists were included in this survey, which is an average of 1.33 ophthalmologists to every 50,000 population. Of the surgeons in this survey, 23,412 (50.22%) were attending or more senior ophthalmologists and were mainly distributed in eastern urban areas. Annual average cataract surgeries per ophthalmologist in China were 259 in 2017, less than 300 cases. Conclusion: The average number of ophthalmologists per population in China has achieved the goal of WHO's Vision 2020; however, these surgeons are concentrated in urban areas. Further, the ability of cataract surgery among ophthalmologists is unbalanced. The annual average cataract surgeries performed by ophthalmologists are insufficient, which is an important factor resulting in the current situation in China that ophthalmic service capacity has not met the requirements for eliminating cataract blindness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: L. V. Prasad Eye Institute has adopted horizontal approach of eye care delivery for the past 22 years at one of its rural secondary centers. The recent implementation of a diagonal model for enhancing glaucoma care at this center and its outcomes are reported. Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study. We included newly and consecutively diagnosed adult glaucoma patients. A comprehensive ophthalmologist provided glaucoma care. During the study period, an experienced glaucoma specialist supported the care for 2 days every month in a structured format that consisted of triaging glaucoma patients for defined protocols of therapy along with hands-on and remote online guidance to the comprehensive ophthalmologist. The data from the worst or single eye were analyzed. Results: We have included 231 patients (151 study and 80 historical controls). Sixty (75%) control patients were managed at the study center and 20 (25%) were referred. The comprehensive ophthalmologist managed 70 (48.2%) study patients and co-managed 75 (51.7%) with the glaucoma specialist. The latter changed the diagnosis in 15 eyes and altered the treatment plan in 44 eyes. Six were excluded. Successful outcome was achieved in 52 (65%) eyes in the control group and 120 (84.5%) eyes in the study group (P <.01). Additionally, study group did better in terms of case detection rate, compliance to treatment and saving on expenses for patients. Conclusion: The new model has shown better clinical outcomes of glaucoma care in an under-served geographic area. The model has the potential for wider applicability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Primary eye care services delivered through vision centres (VC) form an essential part of the national blindness control efforts, but systematic data on the outputs and cost of providing such services in India are not readily available for further planning and efficient use of resources. Methods: Detailed cost and output data were collected from written records for 2017–2018 fiscal year using standardized methods at nine VC in Kolkata city in West Bengal, India. The total economic cost for these VC was computed and the relation of unit cost of services per patient screened with VC scale was assessed using regression analysis. Break-even point was estimated from average and marginal cost functions. Results: 25,009 patients were screened at the 9 VC (range 709–5,717; median 2,826). The overall total economic cost was INR 7,304,172 (USD 113,306), ranging from INR. 509,618 (USD. 7,905) to INR. 1,390,855 (USD. 21,576). Personnel salaries made up 37.8% of the total cost. The unit economic cost of screening a patient was INR 292.1 (USD 4.4) and varied threefold between 9 VC. With a multiple regression model (p <.035, R2 = 0.797), apart from the fixed costs, the incremental cost for each patient screened was INR 81.33 (USD 1.26). Break-even analysis suggested that 44.4% of the VCs were functioning below optimal scale. Conclusion: A further reduction in the unit costs is possible if the optimal scale of services is achieved. These findings can inform resource requirement for the primary eye care services in India. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To estimate the prevalence and causes of blindness (BL), severe visual impairment (SVI), moderate visual impairment (ModVI) and mild visual impairment (MildVI) in children in Narayani Zone, Nepal. Methods: In 2017, 100 population clusters within the Narayani Zone of Nepal were selected using RAAB software. Children (aged 0–15 years) suspected of having visual problems were identified using Key Informants (KIs) and school teachers and were referred for ophthalmologic examination. Eye care staff actively sought children who failed to present for examination. Causes of BL/SVI/ModVI/MildVI were categorized using standard World Health Organization definitions. Results: Of 76,588 children selected, 72,900 (95%) were screened. Of 2,158 children referred for examination, 1,322 were referred by teachers and 836 by KIs. A total of 1,617 (75%) children received a detailed examination, of whom 128 children [65 girls (51%)] mean age of 9.4 (± 4.1 years) were confirmed to have BL 7 (5.5%), SVI 16 (12.5%), ModVI 19 (15%) or MildVI 86 (67%). The combined prevalence of BL/SVI/ModVI/MildVI was 175/100,000 (95% CI 172–178/100,000); BL/SVI/ModVI was 55/100,000 (95% CI 53–57/100,000) and the combined BL/SVI estimate was 30/100,000 (95% CI 29–31/100,000). The leading causes of BL/SVI/MVI were refractive error 23 (55%) and whole globe disorders 5 (12%). Total avoidable causes were 31 (74%). Conclusion: The prevalence of BL/SVI/ModVI among children in Narayani Zone was moderate and included a high proportion of avoidable and treatable cases. Pediatric ophthalmic services need improvement, mainly refractive error correction in rural areas of Nepal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To determine the repeatability and reproducibility of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and Scheimpflug photography for several measurements of corneal scars, including scar size, scar depth, and corneal thickness. Methods: A series of patients treated for fungal keratitis at a tertiary eye care center in South India were recalled two years after successful treatment. Eyes with corneal scars had a slit lamp examination performed by two ophthalmologists masked to the other's examination. For AS-OCT and Scheimpflug photography, each eye had two scans taken by one technician and a third scan taken by a separate technician. Scar measurements were subsequently assessed from AS-OCT images by three graders masked to each other's results. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) from mixed effects linear regression models. Results: Fifty eyes had all measurements taken. The corneal scar size, measured as the geometric mean of the two longest perpendicular meridians, ranged from 0.8 to 5.4 (mean 2.8 mm, 95%CI 2.6 to 3.1). Scar size measurements taken by two separate individuals were most reproducible when the border of the scar was traced from the OCT (ICC 0.90, 95%CI 0.86 to 0.94), and least repeatable when assessed from slit lamp examination (ICC 0.80, 95%CI 0.70 to 0.90). Conclusions: AS-OCT and Scheimpflug imaging of corneal scars produced measurements with acceptable reproducibility that could be useful as cornea-specific outcomes for clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To describe cataract services in Egypt and explore resources and practices in public and private sectors. Methods: The study was conducted between June and August 2015. All facilities in the country providing cataract services were contacted to obtain information on surgeries performed in 2014. Hospitals performing eye surgery in Quena, Sharkia, and Fayoum regions were visited and a questionnaire on resources for cataract surgery was completed. Results: Cataract surgery was offered in the public sector by 64 government and 16 university teaching hospitals and in the private sector by 101 hospitals. Over 90% of all facilities in the country contacted participated in the study. In 2014, the national cataract surgical rate (CSR) was 3674 varying in governorates from 7579 in Ismailia to 402 in Suez. The private sector performed 70% of cataract surgeries. Analysis of three regions showed an 11.7% increase in cataract output between 2010 and 2014. The average number of cataract surgeries per unit in 2014 was 2272 in private, 1633 in university, and 824 in government hospitals. Private hospitals had 60% of human resources for eye care. Phacoemulsification was the surgical technique in 85.6% of private, 72.1% of university, and 41% of government hospitals. Reasons explaining the differences in output between public and private sectors were the lack of trainers, supervisors, and incentives. Conclusion: The private sector provides most of the cataract services in Egypt, resulting in inadequate services for the poor. There is a 15-fold variation in CSR between the best and least served regions. The public sector could increase cataract output by improving training, supervision, and incentives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Here, we report risk factors associated with outcome in severe bacterial keratitis (BK), fungal keratitis (FK), and Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) in India. Methods: Prospective observational cohort study conducted in Aravind Eye Hospital, India. Adults presenting with severe microbial keratitis (MK) were enrolled (size ≥3 mm) and followed to 21 days post-enrolment. Ulcer clinical features were recorded at presentation. Outcomes by final visit were classified as good (completely healed or reduced infiltrate size) or poor (enlarged infiltrate size, perforated, or surgery performed). Results: Of 252 participants with severe MK, 191 had FK, 18 had AK, 19 had BK, 4 had mixed BK/FK, and 20 were microbiologically negative. Median age was 50 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 37-60 years), 64% were male, 63% were agriculturalists, and 45% had no formal education. Corneal trauma occurred in 72%, and median symptom duration before presentation was 7 days (IQR: 5-15 days). Clinical features associated with FK were feathery margins (p < 0.001), raised profile (p = 0.039), or dry surface (p = 0.007). Hypopyon was more likely in BK (p = 0.001) and ring infiltrate in AK (p < 0.001). Ulcers with poor outcome (n = 106/214) were more likely to be larger (odds ratio [OR]: 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30-2.05, p < 0.001), involve the posterior cornea at presentation (OR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.16-4.59, p = 0.017), involve Aspergillus sp. (OR: 3.23, 95% CI: 1.26-8.25, p = 0.014), or occur in females (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.03-4.04, p = 0.04). Even after treatment, 34% (n = 76/221) had severe visual impairment by the final visit. Conclusions: Severe MK occurred predominantly in agriculturalists post-corneal trauma and often had poor outcomes. Provision of community-based eyecare may allow earlier treatment and improve outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Gender and blindness initiatives continue to make eye care personnel aware of the service utilization inequity strongly favouring men, yet interventions to reduce that inequity, particularly for girls, are under developed. Methods: This descriptive study gathered quantitative data on the degree of gender equity at five Child Eye Health Tertiary Facilities (CEHTFs) in Asia and Africa and conducted in-depth interviews with eye care personnel to assess their strategies and capacity to reduce gender inequity. Cataract surgery was utilized to assess the degree of inequity and success of interventions to reduce inequity in case finding, service utilization, and follow-up. Results: CEHTF administrative data showed significant gender inequity in cataract surgical services favouring boys in all settings. CEHTFs actively seek children through community and school-based outreach, yet do not have initiatives to reduce gender inequity. Little gender inequity was found among children receiving surgical and follow-up care, although two out of three children were boys. CEHTF staff, despite being aware, offered no effective means to reduce gender inequity involving cataract surgical services. Interventions that successfully increased service utilization by girls came from individual cases, involving extraordinary effort by a single eye care programme person. Conclusion: Community-based case finders such as Anganwadi workers in India, Female Community Health Volunteers (FCHVs) in Nepal, and Key Informants (KIs) in Africa are necessary to identify children in need of cataract services, but insufficient to increase service utilization by girls. Secondary, often extra-ordinary community-based interventions by eye care personnel are needed in all settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To develop and implement mechanisms to collect, report, and assess the World Health Organization (WHO) core eye health indicators in Chile, Honduras, Mexico, Peru, and Uruguay. Methods: Simple templates for a situational analysis (of data collection and reporting processes), a national data collection strategy, and a national work plan to implement the core eye health indicators were developed. Public and private sector representatives from the ministries of health (MOHs), national vision committees, and national societies of ophthalmology of each country used these tools with 2013 baseline data to improve their data collection processes and collected 2015 data. Final analysis and cross-validation were performed using intraocular lens sales data and last observation carried forward imputation. Results: Study tools were effectively implemented in all five countries and resulted in improved intersectoral stakeholder collaboration and communications, which improved the data collection and reporting processes. More complete and accurate data were reported by 2015 compared to the 2013 baseline. Conclusions: Multisectoral stakeholders, including national professional societies and national vision committees, should collaborate with MOHs to improve the quality of data that are reported to WHO. This study involved these stakeholders in the data collection processes to better understand the realities of indicator implementation, better manage their expectations, and improve data quality. WHO Member States across the globe can feasibly adapt the study tools and methodologies to strengthen their data collection processes. Overall, the reliability and validity of the indicators is hampered with limitations that prevent fully accurate data from being collected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The shortage of ophthalmologists in many countries is a major barrier to timely provision of eye care. A team work approach to screen, detect and manage diabetic retinopathy (DR) could achieve greater screening coverage of people with diabetes to prevent vision loss. This study aimed to assess the attitudes and perceptions of eye care workers and health administrators regarding task sharing for management of DR. Methods: Using purposive sampling, 121 eye and health care workers in five selected hospitals in two provinces in Pakistan were recruited. A cross-sectional survey explored the possibility for involvement of optometrists and mid-level eye care workers to share tasks with ophthalmologists for DR management and the potential outcomes of task sharing, through multiple choice and open-ended questions. Results: Ninety-six (79%) participants-doctors (n = 56), optometrists (n = 29) and mid-level eye care workers (n = 11) responded to the survey. All participants supported task sharing in screening and detection for management of DR. There was no significant difference among the groups with respect to their positive attitude towards task sharing (p = 0.22). The majority in each group believed that the task sharing would not degrade the quality of care (p = 0.48). Two potential major outcomes of task sharing in the eye care system included the benefits for people with diabetes and potential DR and the strengthening of the health care system. Conclusion: Task sharing among various cadres of eye care workers has the potential to improve screening coverage of people with diabetes to prevent visual loss from DR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To determine the magnitude and determinants of the ratio between prevalence of low vision and prevalence of blindness in rapid assessment of avoidable blindness (RAAB) surveys globally. Methods: Standard RAAB reports were downloaded from the repository or requested from principal investigators. Potential predictor variables included prevalence of uncorrected refractive error (URE) as well as gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, health expenditure per capita of the country across World Bank regions. Univariate and multivariate linear regression were used to investigate the correlation between potential predictor variables and the ratio. Results: The results of 94 surveys from 43 countries showed that the ratio ranged from 1.35 in Mozambique to 11.03 in India with a median value of 3.90 (Interquartile range 3.06;5.38). Univariate regression analysis showed that prevalence of URE (p = 0.04), logarithm of GDP per capita (p = 0.01) and logarithm of health expenditure per capita (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with the higher ratio. However, only prevalence of URE was found to be significant in multivariate regression analysis (p = 0.03). Conclusion: There is a wide variation in the ratio of the prevalence of low vision to the prevalence of blindness. Eye care service utilization indicators such as the prevalence of URE may explain some of the variation across the regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Previous reports, albeit isolated, of vision and ocular screening of athletes with intellectual disability participating in the Special Olympics, UK, indicated high rates of refractive error and ocular morbidity; however, there have been no reports of similar sports events for this population from India. This study set out to evaluate the vision profile and ocular characteristics of athletes with intellectual disability attending the Special Olympics Lions Club International Opening Eyes (SOLCIOE) event in 2012 in India. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted, where a protocol-based ophthalmological assessment was performed by trained optometrists at a tertiary eye care center. Results: Overall, 172 athletes (mean age 18.6 years, 70% male) with intellectual disability participated, and 138 (80%) were able to cooperate for complete or nearly complete vision and ocular assessment. A total of 56 (32%) had never had a previous vision or ocular health status examination. A total of 46 (32%) presented with low vision (World Health Organization definition <6/18 to 3/60 in the better eye), 21% needed a first or updated spectacle prescription, and 28% had significant ocular pathology as the cause of visual loss. Conclusions: The proportions of refractive errors and ocular disorders in athletes with intellectual disability attending the SOLCIOE program in South India are similar to those reported for able-bodied school-aged children in urban and rural India. Like that of their able-bodied peers, the visual needs of children with intellectual disability are also not adequately being met. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]