Search

Vision loss and blindness are among the top ten disabilities in the United States, yet access and utilization of eye care remains low. Vision Detroit aimed to address eye-care disparities via community-based screenings. By investigating burden of eye disease and barriers to eye-care utilization in an underserved urban community, we may direct efforts to improve access.Twenty-three screenings were conducted from March 2015-November 2017. Patient information gathered at screenings were demographics, medical and social history, eye exam/referral history, insurance status, primary care physician (PCP) status, and patient-perceived eye-care barriers.Three-hundred-eighty patients were screened, 42% African American and 51% Hispanic. Average age was 53 ± 16.4 years, 70% reported vision problems, 50% reported over two years of vision problems, and average habitual visual acuity in best-seeing eye was 20/37. Eye-care underutilization was reported in 61% of type-2 diabetics. Older age and PCP recommendations/referrals were associated with increased utilization in all patients. Insurance was the most common barrier (53%); of the 55% insured, 31% reported financial barriers. Employed patients were more likely than unemployed to report a time barrier (odds ratio = 1.76, 95% confidence interval 1.03-3.01). Those with high school or less education reported "unaware of need", "unsure where to go", "transportation", and "insurance" as barriers more often.Visual burden was pervasive, yet access was suboptimal. Financial, logistical, and awareness barriers were common. PCP referral and older age were associated with increased utilization. Those less educated reported more barriers, highlighting the need to address fiscal concerns and eye-health education.

Epidemiological information is expected to be used to develop key aspects of eye care such as to control and minimise the impact of diseases, to allocate resources, to monitor public health actions, to determine the best treatment options and to forecast the consequence of diseases in populations. Epidemiological studies are expected to provide information about the prevalence and/or incidence of eye diseases or conditions. To determine prevalence is necessary to perform a cross-sectional screening of the population at risk to ascertain the number of cases.The aim of this review is to describe and evaluate capture-recapture methods (or models) to ascertaining the number of individuals with a disease (e.g. diabetic retinopathy) or condition (e.g. vision impairment) in the population.The review covers the fundamental aspects of capture-recapture methods that would enable non-experts in epidemiology to use it in ophthalmic studies. The review provides information about theoretical aspects of the method with examples of studies in ophthalmology in which it has been used. We also provide a problem/solution approach for limitations arising from the lists obtained from registers or other reliable sources.We concluded that capture-recapture models can be considered reliable to estimate the total number of cases with eye conditions using incomplete information from registers. Accordingly, the method may be used to maintain updated epidemiological information about eye conditions helping to tackle the lack of surveillance information in many regions of the globe., This study was supported by FCT (COMPETE/QREN) grant reference [PTDC/DPT-EPI/0412/2012] in the context of the Prevalence and Costs of Visual Impairment in Portugal: a hospital-based study (PCVIP-study) and FCT Strategic Funding UID/FIS/04650/2013. PLR is funded by FCT (COMPETE/QREN) grant reference [SFRH/BD/119420/2016].

To estimate the number of patients accessing eye care with low vision (LV) at a large multi-site ophthalmology institute who utilize low vision rehabilitation (LVR) services and compare their characteristics to individuals who do not utilize LVR services.This is an electronic health record-based retrospective chart analysis. Patients with LV were identified as having at least one encounter in 2014 where the best visual acuity (VA) in the better-seeing eye was worse than 20/40. Utilization of LVR services across 9 clinic locations was evaluated. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine patient characteristics associated with service utilization.Of the 7,752 LV patients, 1,585 (20%) utilized LVR services over the 17-month period. Those utilizing LVR were more likely to have VA between 20/60 and 20/200 or between 20/200 and 20/500 than non-users (Patients are more likely to utilize services when VA is moderately to severely impaired, VA fluctuations are present, or when LVR services are provided at the same location where other ophthalmic services are obtained. These estimates are important for developing interventions aimed at improving LVR utilization.

Purpose: To modify the Western Canada Waiting List Project (WCWLP) cataract prioritization criteria into measurement instruments for assessing appropriateness and prioritization emphasizing health-...

Purpose: L. V. Prasad Eye Institute has adopted horizontal approach of eye care delivery for the past 22 years at one of its rural secondary centers. The recent implementation of a diagonal model for enhancing glaucoma care at this center and its outcomes are reported.Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study. We included newly and consecutively diagnosed adult glaucoma patients. A comprehensive ophthalmologist provided glaucoma care. During the study period, an experienced glaucoma specialist supported the care for 2 days every month in a structured format that consisted of triaging glaucoma patients for defined protocols of therapy along with hands-on and remote online guidance to the comprehensive ophthalmologist. The data from the worst or single eye were analyzed.Results: We have included 231 patients (151 study and 80 historical controls). Sixty (75%) control patients were managed at the study center and 20 (25%) were referred. The comprehensive ophthalmologist managed 70 (48.2%) study patients and co-managed 75 (51.7%) with the glaucoma specialist. The latter changed the diagnosis in 15 eyes and altered the treatment plan in 44 eyes. Six were excluded. Successful outcome was achieved in 52 (65%) eyes in the control group and 120 (84.5%) eyes in the study group (P < .01). Additionally, study group did better in terms of case detection rate, compliance to treatment and saving on expenses for patients.Conclusion: The new model has shown better clinical outcomes of glaucoma care in an under-served geographic area. The model has the potential for wider applicability.

Cataract surgery is the most common surgery performed in the European Union (EU) annually. Analysis of Google Trends (GT) data could give European eye care providers useful information regarding interest in cataract surgery and potential barriers making patients unwilling to undergo surgery.Data were collected using GT for cataract surgery and the two most related queries, for each of 14 included countries from January 2004 to December 2018. Case volumes were extracted from the Eurostat report for the calendar years 2004-2018.The most related queries analysis demonstrated surgery outcomes, founding issues and understanding of the disease as potential factors for patients considering cataract surgery. Trend analysis showed that the total search volumes for "cataract surgery" gradually increased over the study period. Also, for "cataract", "after cataract surgery", "cataract surgery NHF" rising trends were revealed. Trends found for "cataract surgery price" and "cataract surgery complications" were inconclusive. Univariate linear regression analysis demonstrated statistically significant correlations between average annual search volumes of "cataract surgery" and the annual volume of cataract surgeries performed in included countries, according to Eurostat data (To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first and the only analysis of GT data in the ophthalmology literature to date. This study highlights this potentially powerful data set for European eye care providers.

To outline and detail the importance of conditional probability in clinical decision making and discuss the various diagnostic measures eye care practitioners should be aware of in order to improve the scope of their clinical practice.We conducted a review of the importance of conditional probability in diagnostic testing for the eye care practitioner.Eye care practitioners use diagnostic tests on a daily basis to assist in clinical decision making and optimizing patient care and management. These tests provide probabilistic information that can enable the clinician to increase (or decrease) their level of certainty about the presence of a particular condition. While an understanding of the characteristics of diagnostic tests are essential to facilitate proper interpretation of test results and disease risk, many practitioners either confuse or misinterpret these measures.In the interests of their patients, practitioners should be aware of the basic concepts associated with diagnostic testing and the simple mathematical rule that underpins them. Importantly, the practitioner needs to recognize that the prevalence of a disease in the population greatly determines the clinical value of a diagnostic test.

Purpose: To investigate the distribution of cataract surgery performed by ophthalmologists in China.Methods: A cross-sectional study was designed to investigate nationwide ophthalmological resources and capacity for cataract surgery in China⁠-The 2014 China National Eye Care Capacity and Resource Survey. Data analyzed in this report included regional distribution, urban-rural comparison, levels and types of medical institutions, and cataract surgery types and volume per surgeon. In China, only ophthalmologists at or above the level of attending are eligible to perform cataract surgery independently, so the ability of cataract surgery for ophthalmologists at or above the level of attending is analyzed in the current study. Descriptive statistics were used.Results: 36,333 ophthalmologists were included in this survey, which is an average of 1.33 ophthalmologists to every 50,000 population. Of the surgeons in this survey, 23,412 (50.22%) were attending or more senior ophthalmologists and were mainly distributed in eastern urban areas. Annual average cataract surgeries per ophthalmologist in China were 259 in 2017, less than 300 cases.Conclusion: The average number of ophthalmologists per population in China has achieved the goal of WHO's Vision 2020; however, these surgeons are concentrated in urban areas. Further, the ability of cataract surgery among ophthalmologists is unbalanced. The annual average cataract surgeries performed by ophthalmologists are insufficient, which is an important factor resulting in the current situation in China that ophthalmic service capacity has not met the requirements for eliminating cataract blindness.

To assess the use of eye care services in a rural population in North China and to analyze the factors associated with underuse of these services.In a cross-sectional population-based study, demographic, health and vision-related information including use of eye care services were determined during a face-to-face interview. A single visit to an eye care provider qualified as "use" of eye care services.Of 6612 participants, 754 (11.4%, 95% confidence interval, CI, 8.7-14.1%) had used eye care services. The most common reason cited for not seeing an eye care provider was "no need" (n = 5754). Of the 5754 who thought that there was no need to see an ophthalmologist, 3458 (60.1%) were found to have one or more type of eye disease, including glaucoma (56, 1.0%), cataract (1056, 18.4%), age-related macular degeneration (AMD; 164, 2.9%) and refractive error (3048, 53.0%). Also, 74 (1.3%) and 409 (7.1%) of the 5754 participants had visual impairment (20/60) according to best-corrected visual acuity and presenting visual acuity, respectively. In a multiple regression model, participants who had glaucoma (adjusted odds ratio, OR, 4.0, 95% CI 3.0-5.4), AMD (adjusted OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.3) or refractive error (adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8), were more likely to visit an eye care provider.A high proportion of the Chinese rural population had never used eye care services although three fifths had eye diseases. Further efforts towards better education of the general population about common eye problems as well as increasing the number of ocular health providers would be necessary in future.

To evaluate the association between sociodemographic factors and eye care expenditure and to assess the burden of ocular expenditure compared to total health care expenditure.A retrospective analysis of ocular expenditure in participants of the 2007 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Data from 20,620 unique participants aged ≥18 years were evaluated for eye care expenditure by demographic characteristics.A total of 22% of the studied population had eye care expenditures in 2007. Demographic factors significantly associated with higher probability of having eye care expenditures included older age (65+ years 35%, 45-64 years 23%,45 years 17%), female sex (female 26%, male 19%), higher educational attainment (greater than high school education 25%, less than high school education 17%), having insurance (private 24%, uninsured 13%), and visual impairment (mild 31%, none 22%). Older age, female sex, higher educational attainment, having insurance, and presence of visual impairment were also significantly associated with higher mean eye care expenditure. In those with eye care expenditure, the mean ratio between eye care and total medical expenditure was 24%, with uninsured patients spending 42% of their medical care expenditure on eye care.Demographic factors are associated with both the probability of having ocular expenditure and the amount of expenditure. Of all factors examined, insurance status has the most potential for modification. Policy makers should consider these numbers when devising the terms by which eye care coverage will be provided under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

To investigate patterns and factors associated with subsequent eye care for Taiwan's children.We conducted a population-based historical cohort study of 2464 children aged between 3 and 12 years old from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Participants' ocular conditions were identified based on 2005 NHIS questionnaire answers given by caregivers. Subsequent eye care data was obtained from 2006 and 2007 National Health Insurance claim data. Eye care related to these children's ocular conditions was defined by physician's diagnosis using the International Classification of Diseases version 9 clinical modification codes. Poisson regression with robust variance estimation was used to determine factors associated with eye care use.Of the 2464 children, 712 (28.9%) had ocular conditions in 2005, and 56.5% and 44.7% of them didn't receive eye care during the subsequent 1- and 2-year periods, respectively. Among those with ocular conditions, the 3-4-year-olds were least likely to receive eye care in the subsequent 1 and 2 years. Children with highly educated fathers were more likely to receive eye care in the subsequent 1-year period. Sex, family income, level of mother's education, residential area and eye care resources were not significant factors for children with ocular conditions receiving subsequent eye care within either 1 or 2 years.Despite the fact that Taiwan has a National Health Insurance Program, lack of subsequent eye care remains high, even when a child's ocular condition is known by the caregiver. Determinants associated with follow-up eye care must be considered when designing eye care enhancing programs for children.

To examine whether the local availabilities of ophthalmologists and optometrists were associated with outcomes related to the prevention and timely treatment of vision conditions.Data on adults from the 2008 National Health Interview Survey were linked to county-level information on the numbers of ophthalmologists and optometrists per capita from the Area Health Resources File. Multivariate logistic regression models were estimated for whether individuals likely to perceive themselves as being at lower risk of vision conditions had undergone a dilated eye exam in the previous 2 years, whether individuals with diabetes had a dilated eye exam in the previous year, and whether individuals with an age-related eye disease (ARED) had lost vision due to the condition. The models included measures of local eye care provider availability and additional explanatory variables.The county-level availabilities of ophthalmologists and optometrists were positively and significantly related to the likelihood that perceived lower-risk individuals had undergone a dilated eye exam in the previous 2 years. Local eye care provider availability was not significantly related to whether individuals with diabetes had a dilated eye exam in the previous year. Greater county-level availability of ophthalmologists, but not optometrists, was associated with a significantly lower likelihood that individuals with an ARED had lost vision due to the condition.Public health interventions may be needed in order to increase access to preventive eye care in areas with limited overall eye care provider availability and to improve the treatment of vision conditions in areas with limited ophthalmologist availability.

To test whether general nurses, trained in screening for glaucoma, can increase the number of glaucoma cases seen by eye-care professionals in a rural setting in Africa.In two districts in Malawi, 87 clinic nurses and two ophthalmic clinical officers were trained in case detection and referral of patients with suspect glaucoma. Data were collected on the number of patients screened and referred over a 12-month period. The clinic nurses and ophthalmic clinical officers received supportive supervision four times during the period and interviews were used to elicit their perspectives on the training and referral procedures.The 87 nurses screened 294 people (mean 3.4 per nurse) and referred 147 (50%) of them. Of the 147 referred, 56 (38%) were seen by the ophthalmic clinical officers who referred 15 (27%) to the ophthalmologist. Only two people were seen by the ophthalmologist. Testing visual acuity in people over 40 years of age was not seen as a priority by primary level clinic nurses. Nurses reported that cost and distance were barriers precluding attendance by patients at the next level. Women were two times less likely to be referred. About one quarter of patients who were offered surgery refused. Fewer than half the patients who had surgery attend for follow-up.Training general nurses to screen for and refer suspect glaucoma cases did not lead to increased glaucoma service delivery. Other strategies to identify high risk patients need to be tested.

To determine how people attending outreach eye care clinics in Papua New Guinea (PNG) perceive eye health and eye health services.An interview-based questionnaire was administrated to a convenience sample of 614 adult participants across four provinces and perceptions of eye health and eye health services were recorded. Presenting and near visual acuity were measured and cause of visual impairment (VI) determined.In this sample, 113/614 participants (18.4%) presented with distance VI, 16 (2.6%) with distance blindness, and 221 (47.6%) with near VI. Older participants and those with near VI were more likely to indicate that it is hard to have an eye examination due to travel time, lack of transport and transport costs. Female participants and those from underserved areas were more likely to report shame and fear of jealousy from others when asked about their attitudes towards spectacles. Participants reporting that they were willing to pay higher amounts for testing and spectacles/treatment also reported higher education levels, higher household incomes and were more likely to be male. A quarter of participants (25.9%) indicated that they did not like having an eye examination because their reading and writing was poor.People attending outreach eye care clinics in PNG reported finding it difficult to attend eye health services due to transport difficulties and anticipated high costs. Negative attitudes towards spectacles were also prevalent, and negative perceptions appeared more frequently among older participants and those with less education.

To evaluate the quality and efficacy of the Ban Phaeo Mobile Eye Clinic (BPMEC) model in providing cataract surgery to rural Thailand.Retrospective review of 4-week postoperative visual acuity (VA) of 7040 patients receiving unilateral cataract surgery at 75 sites from October 2008 to March 2011. BPMEC conducted screening, surgery, and follow-up at partnering local hospitals that otherwise do not offer eye care. The primary outcome was achievement of VA ≥20/70, which was secondarily analyzed by cataract extraction method (phacoemulsification, phaco, or extracapsular cataract extraction, ECCE) and intraocular lens (IOL) type (foldable acrylic or rigid polymethylmethacrylate).Preoperatively, 249 eyes (4%) had uncorrected VA ≥20/70. Four weeks postoperatively, 5957 (85%) had VA ≥20/70, 3288 (47%) had VA ≥20/40, and 69 (1%) were lost to follow-up. Phaco was performed in 6324 eyes (90%), 1581 (25%) receiving foldable IOLs. A total of 1403 eyes (89%) undergoing phaco with a foldable IOL had postoperative VA ≥20/70, compared to 4058 (85%) and 496 (69%) of those undergoing phaco with a rigid IOL (p 0.05) and ECCE with a rigid IOL (p 0.001), respectively. Overall, 37 eyes were left aphakic. Reported intraocular complications included zonular dehiscence (37 eyes), retained lens fragment (2 eyes), wound leakage (1 eye), and posterior capsule tear (1 eye).The 4-week uncorrected postoperative VAs met the World Health Organization's quality target of VA ≥20/70 for eyes undergoing phaco and were comparable to those published by an urban hospital in Bangkok.

Glaucoma is a priority eye disease in Oman. In order to revise the existing policies for eye care, a study was conducted to review the noncompliance rates among glaucoma patients.Using the random method, we selected 105 glaucoma patients from among those visiting glaucoma clinics during 2003. They were interviewed by trained health professionals. A closed-ended questionnaire with 42 questions was used to note their responses. The questions dealt with their personal characteristics along with the patients' glaucoma treatment and their knowledge of and attitudes towards different components of noncompliance with medical treatment. The field staffs also observed the 'practice' of instilling placebo eyedrops. The responses were analyzed to grade the compliance, knowledge, attitude and practice of each patient.Excellent compliance was found in 26 patients. Discontinuation of medication in the past was reported by 87 patients. Missing instillation of eyedrops and irregular visits to the ophthalmologist were noted in 10 and 14 patients, respectively. Adequate knowledge about glaucoma and its complications was negatively associated with noncompliance [RR 2.05 (95% CI 1.07-3.93)].The high rates of noncompliance among glaucoma patients in Oman demand a systematic programmed approach. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the causal association between noncompliance and Knowledge, Attitude and Practice. Health education, communication while dispensing medication, reducing the frequency of medication and using devices for the easy administration of eyedrops could further improve compliance.

The aim of the study was to develop a new questionnaire to assess visual symptoms/dysfunction and impact on vision-specific quality of life for those undergoing second eye cataract extraction. Items for the VSQ questionnaire were devised with reference to existing literature and following consultation with eye care experts (n = 18) and interviews with cataract patients (n = 40). Piloting work conducted with 53 patients indicated that the questionnaire was promising, with a high level of internal consistency, low levels of missing data and indications that it was responsive to surgery. A modified version of the questionnaire was completed by 105 patients having received 'early' surgery and 103 scheduled for routine surgery within a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of second eye cataract surgery. Analyses showed that the internal consistency of both the visual symptoms/dysfunction and quality of life areas was high (Cronbach's alpha 0.82 and 0.83, respectively). Highly significant improvements were found for early surgery patients (p < 0.0001), with little change among routine surgery patients. Two final versions of the VSQ questionnaire have been produced for future use in assessing visual symptoms/dysfunction and impact on vision-specific quality of life: a scoreable short form and more detailed and sensitive long form.

To report the prevalence and causes of blindness in people aged 50 years and older in Paraguay, and to compare these with the previous national survey in 1999, focusing on planning of future eye care activities.A rapid assessment of avoidable blindness (RAAB) was conducted in 2011. A total of 60 clusters of 50 residents aged 50 years and older were randomly selected and visited, and 2862 people were examined (95.4%). Survey data were analyzed with the RAAB software and compared with findings of a similar survey from 1999.The prevalence of bilateral blindness in Paraguay was 1.0% (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.6-1.6) in 2011, significantly less than the 3.1% (95% CI 2.2-4.4) in 1999. Prevalence of bilateral cataract and cataract eyes had also reduced significantly for visual acuity, VA,3/60, VA6/60 and VA6/18. Cataract surgical coverage in persons doubled to 90% for VA3/60, 78% for VA6/60 and 63% for VA6/18. Visual outcome after cataract surgery also improved to nearly the World Health Organization norm. Cataract was the main cause of blindness (43.8%), followed by severe visual impairment (40.5%). Uncorrected refractive errors were the main cause of moderate (78.0%) and the second cause of severe (18.9%) visual impairment.The reduction in blindness and visual impairment due to cataract in Paraguay between 1999 and 2011 was highly significant. Results and coverage of cataract surgical services improved substantially. The reported numbers of cataract operations may not have been complete as these do not seem to match the dramatic improvement in the cataract situation in Paraguay.

Purpose Family practice (FP), General Practice (GP) and obstetrics-gynecology (OB/GYN) physicians were surveyed to determine whether they routinely referred pregnant patients with diabetes to an ophthalmologist, looked into the patient's eyes to screen for retinopathy, and dilated the eyes for fundi examination.Methods Hospitals providing obstetrical services were contacted to identify primary-care physicians. Physicians identified as having obstetrical privileges were surveyed by mail to determine if they were actively providing obstetrical care. Physicians who provided both obstetrical and diabetes care were mailed a survey.Results Of 668 physicians surveyed, 429 responded: 224 FPS, 184 OB/GYNS and 21 GPS. A relatively small percentage (27%) of physicians in both groups routinely refer all of their pregnant patients with pre-existing diabetes to an ophthalmologist. Family practice physicians were more likely to perform an eye exam to screen for retinopathy in patients with both pre-existing and gestatio...

To explore the effect of demographic characteristics on the outcomes of cataract surgery in terms of visual acuity and patient satisfaction, and gender role in the uptake of postoperative care.Comprehensive ocular examinations were performed on 478 subjects (558 eyes) over the age of 50 years who underwent surgery for age-related cataract at the largest eye hospital in Iran. Demographic characteristics were obtained and surgical records were reviewed.Male subjects had significantly better outcomes in terms of uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) (mean difference 0.12 and 0.13 logMAR; p = 0.004 and p0.001, respectively). Women were significantly less satisfied than men (73.2% vs. 83.6%; p = 0.011). Postoperative UCVA and BSCVA were better in patients with higher levels of education (both p0.001). Age had an inverse association with UCVA (p = 0.004) and BSCVA (p0.001). Women were twice as likely to need capsulotomy (p = 0.002). Men's uptake of postoperative refractive care was 4-fold that of women's (31% vs. 7%). In multivariable analyses, age, sex, education, presence of ocular comorbidity and need for capsulotomy, spectacle prescription and other care were associated with postoperative UCVA (all p0.05; adjusted R(2) = 0.256).Female patients were shown to be at a clear disadvantage in cataract surgery; outcomes of the procedure and postoperative care were both poorer. Older age, lower level of education, ocular comorbidity and unmet postoperative need were also associated with a poorer outcome.

To examine the different dimensions of access to eye care from a public health perspective.We substantively review the theoretical and empirical literature on access to eye care and summarize the major considerations in measuring access to eye care using a modified behavioral framework.We found that progress has been made, but some gaps still remain in measuring access to eye care. Most studies have focused on individual characteristics and use of eye care services. Only a very few studies have touched on contextual characteristics, such as demographic make-up of the area in which the patient lives, and their impact on the use of eye care services. Few studies have explored the linkage between the use of eye care services and outcomes or between the use of such services and patient satisfaction.To address a variety of demands from patients, providers, and policy makers, it is necessary to account for potential access and realized access measures. We need to adopt new methods in assessing the relationship between contextual characteristics and use of eye care services. Moreover, we need to better understand patients' satisfaction and their relationship with utilization and health outcomes.

Evisceration is an alternative treatment modality to enucleation for many end-stage eye diseases. No study has addressed the indications for evisceration of eyes in Saudi Arabia. The aim of this study was to determine the current clinical indications for evisceration in patients at a tertiary eye care center and attempt clinicopathological correlation.Clinical records of patients who had undergone evisceration at a tertiary eye care center over a 4-year period were reviewed retrospectively. The patients' demographic data and clinical indications for evisceration were studied, and the results from histopathological findings were correlated with the clinical diagnosis.Evisceration of the eyes was performed in 187 patients. Males outnumbered females in a ratio of 1.3:1 (105 males and 82 females). Blind painful eye was the primary presenting symptom in 117 (62.6%) patients and unsightly eye in 38 (20.3%) patients. Clinical indications for evisceration included endophthalmitis in 85 (45.5%), phthisis bulbi in 38 (20.3%), traumatic injury in 36 (19.2%), and glaucoma in 14 (7.5%) patients. Sixty-three patients (33.7%) had prior history of cataract surgery, penetrating keratoplasty, glaucoma surgery, or retina surgery. Clinicopathological correlation was 100% in cases with definite clinical diagnosis of endophthalmitis.Blind painful eye, endophthalmitis, phthisis bulbi, severe traumatic injury, and glaucoma were the major indications for eviscerations in a tertiary eye care center.

To determine the awareness, use, and barriers to use of eye services in Fiji's Central Province.A cross-sectional survey study design with random clusters of households was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted (152 females and 22 males). For 267 household members, presenting distance and near visual acuities were measured, and the perception of and satisfaction with their vision were recorded.Most (86%; 150/174) respondents were aware of at least one conventional eye care service. However, only 66% (121/183) of household members with previous eye problems had consulted one of these; the proportion was even lower for those in the older age groups (p0.01). Rural dwellers expressed satisfaction with their vision, despite being more likely to regard it as limiting their activities and being less likely to seek conventional care. A higher proportion of females were reported to have (or have had) eye problems (60:40) and were found to have bilateral visual impairment (60:40). Despite this, females and males attended the hospital eye clinic (47:53) or sought treatment from conventional services (51:49) nearly equally. The reasons given for not seeking conventional care were "fatalistic attitude" ("did not bother", "could manage", or accepted the condition: 57%), expense (12%), and fear (8%).Central Province Fijians, particularly the old, rural, and female, under-utilise conventional eye care services. As in developing countries elsewhere, fatalistic attitudes to visual impairment are a significant contributor to this. To improve eye health, planning and implementation of eye care services must overcome under-utilisation by addressing local barriers to uptake through community participation in education and affirmative action.

purpose To determine the prevalence of non-vision-impairing ocular conditions (NVIC) and estimate the number of primary eye care treatments per 1000 population per month. methods A cross-sectional study in a random sample of 1670 people was done to determine the load of NVIC in a village in Chakwal district. results The prevalence of NVIC was 30.6% (306 per 1000 population). NVIC with the exclusion of presbyopia accounted for 14.6%. The main NVIC were allergic conjunctivitis (3.7%), bacterial conjunctivitis (3.5%), pterygium/pinguicula (2.6%) and acute/chronic dacryocystitis (1%). The average Complaint Frequency (CF) per month/1000 population was 55, excluding complaints of near vision and watery eyes. conclusions The foundation of a comprehensive district eye care strategy in the light of VISION 2020 ‐ the Right to Sight ‐ remains an effective primary eye care service whose elements are treatment of NVIC, detection and referral of cataracts and refractive errors, and promotion of eye health.

To estimate the direct and indirect costs of three cataract surgery procedures: extracapsular cataract extraction with intra-ocular lens implantation (ECCE-IOL), phacoemulsification (PHACO) and manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) using economic costing principles in a well-established eye care programme (Aravind Eye Hospital) in Tamil Nadu, South India during 2000-01. Previous literature suggests that PHACO and MSICS have similar effectiveness.The average unit cost for each surgical procedure was calculated from the societal perspective using economic costing methods. Total annual provider's direct costs for each input to surgery were calculated and apportioned appropriately to different cataract surgery techniques using a 'micro-costing approach'. The patient's direct and indirect costs for each procedure were calculated by interviewing staff and patients and by using assumptions about prices for relevant cost items such as transportation, food, medicine, spectacles and economic productivity loss.Average provider's direct costs were highest for PHACO procedures (25.55 US dollars) compared to MSICS (17.03 US dollars) and ECCE-IOL (16.25 US dollars). The difference can be attributed to the cost of equipment and materials. Average direct and indirect patient costs were highest for ECCE-IOL (19.85 US dollars), while the costs for PHACO and MSICS were identical (12.37 US dollars). ECCE-IOL had the highest total costs and MSICS had the lowest total costs from the societal perspective.Our results suggest that MSICS may have a lower societal cost than other options. Government and NGO hospitals providing cataract surgeries should invest in regular cost analyses, reviews of the literature on effectiveness, and formal cost-effectiveness analyses in order to plan economically efficient interventions. Considering the small incremental cost for providers (less than 1 US dollar), improved outcomes, and lower patient costs, we also believe that MSICS is an important technique to use in efforts to eliminate cataract blindness in India and this result may be generalised to other developing countries.

To identify the location of barriers to treatment for glaucoma and cataract among African-American Medicare beneficiaries.We examined the receipt of eye care in general and care for glaucoma and cataract in particular among black and white Medicare beneficiaries using 1991 Medicare physician claims data. Racial differences in treatment for glaucoma and cataract were examined both for the Medicare population as a whole and for identified eye care users. The results were compared to the expected value of black-white difference based on population prevalence data for each specific condition.Thirty percent of black beneficiaries and 45% of white Medicare beneficiaries used eye care services in 1991. After adjusting for the expected difference in prevalence, black beneficiaries were half as likely to be surgically treated for glaucoma compared to white beneficiaries, and 80% as likely for cataract. When the analysis was restricted to those using eye care services, blacks continued to have lower than expected rates of treatment for glaucoma (observed RR = 3.2, 95% confidence interval = 3.1-3.4 vs an expected RR of 4.3, 95% confidence interval = 3.5-5.4), but a higher rate of treatment for cataract (RR = 1.2, 95% confidence interval = 1.2-1.3). Among those with physician-diagnosed glaucoma and cataract, blacks were more likely to undergo surgical treatment for these conditions than whites (RR = 1.5 for glaucoma, 95% confidence interval = 1.4-1.5; RR = 1.2 for cataract, 95% confidence interval = 1.2-1.3).Barriers to treatment for glaucoma and cataract among black Medicare beneficiaries involve primarily limitations in access to the eye care system. The undertreatment for glaucoma among black beneficiaries was reduced, but not eliminated, after removing the effect of unequal access to the eye care system.

Only 5% of the world's population is found in the United States, yet we as a nation consume 40% of the world's resources. In stark contrast, two thirds of the world's population live in developing countries where 90% of all blindness occurs and where even the most basic resources for eye care delivery are scarce or absent. Using U.S. criteria defining blindness (less than 20/200 [6/60]), the World Health Organization estimated in 1984 that 42-52 million people were blind from all causes, an increase of more than 10% since 1978. High population growth rates in most developing countries coupled with the failure of governments to develop health services commensurate with needs are responsible for this trend. On economic grounds alone, the U.S. eye care delivery paradigm cannot be broadly replicated in the developing world. Instead, cost-effective creative strategies, many already in place, such as mass surgery camps in Asia and delivery of eye care by non-ophthalmologists in Africa, can be expanded and streamlined. The upgrading of sight restoration and preservation care depends upon mobilization of political will within the international health community; governments must prioritize eye care as a public health problem; health planners must mobilize financial resources and work closely with technical assistance organizations, and ministries of health must cease to emulate expensive high-technology eye care models.