Search

Epidemiological information is expected to be used to develop key aspects of eye care such as to control and minimise the impact of diseases, to allocate resources, to monitor public health actions, to determine the best treatment options and to forecast the consequence of diseases in populations. Epidemiological studies are expected to provide information about the prevalence and/or incidence of eye diseases or conditions. To determine prevalence is necessary to perform a cross-sectional screening of the population at risk to ascertain the number of cases. The aim of this review is to describe and evaluate capture-recapture methods (or models) to ascertaining the number of individuals with a disease (e.g. diabetic retinopathy) or condition (e.g. vision impairment) in the population. The review covers the fundamental aspects of capture-recapture methods that would enable non-experts in epidemiology to use it in ophthalmic studies. The review provides information about theoretical aspects of the method with examples of studies in ophthalmology in which it has been used. We also provide a problem/solution approach for limitations arising from the lists obtained from registers or other reliable sources. We concluded that capture-recapture models can be considered reliable to estimate the total number of cases with eye conditions using incomplete information from registers. Accordingly, the method may be used to maintain updated epidemiological information about eye conditions helping to tackle the lack of surveillance information in many regions of the globe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate current delivery of glaucoma care in Botswana; in particular, the service infrastructure available and glaucoma-related workload. Methods: A multi-center cross-sectional study was undertaken comprising government eye care institutions and ophthalmic personnel across Botswana. Data on human resources, equipment types and numbers, diagnostic criteria routinely used, treatments routinely provided, and new and repeat glaucoma consultations were obtained through quantitative and qualitative surveys. Results: In 27 government eye care institutions there were two general ophthalmologists, neither of whom had a subspecialty interest in glaucoma, 64 ophthalmic nurses, two optometrists, one low vision therapist, one refractionist, and two equipment technicians. Only 8.5% of available ophthalmic human resources were taken up with provision of glaucoma care. About 1/3 of hospitals did not have tonometers, most primary hospitals lacked slit lamp biomicroscopes and most hospitals lacked sensitive diagnostic equipment. A diagnosis of glaucoma was made by either an ophthalmic nurse or an ophthalmologist, but only 10% of institutions could meet recommendations for follow-up assessment. Topical glaucoma medications were prescribed by almost all hospital clinics, usually by ophthalmic nurses. Drug choices were largely determined by local availability. Glaucoma surgery accounted for 0.8% of total eye operations. Glaucoma patients took up 8.5% of total clinic visits. The total number of glaucoma visits was highest in the two hospitals with ophthalmologists. New glaucoma cases took up 10.3% of total glaucoma visits. Conclusion: This study highlights the challenges faced in caring for glaucoma patients in Botswana; in particular, lack of professional human resources, equipment and availability of effective treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]