Search

Purpose: A population based, cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted to estimate the total penetrance of contact lens wear in Australia. Methods: A total of 42,749 households around Australia were randomly selected from the national electronic telephone directory based on postcode distribution. Before contact was attempted, letters of introduction were sent. The number of individuals and contact lens wearers in each household was ascertained and lens wearers were interviewed to determine details of lens type and mode of wear using a structured questionnaire. Results: Of households contacted, 59.2% (19,171/32,405) agreed to participate. Response rates were only marginally higher amongst households that first received a letter of introduction. In these households, 35,914 individuals were identified, of which, 1,798 were contact lens wearers. The penetrance of contact lens wear during the study period was 5.01% (95% CI: 4.78-5.24). Soft hydrogel lenses had the largest penetrance in the community, (66.7% of all wearers), however, their market share decreased significantly over the study period with increased uptake of newly introduced lens types. Conclusions: The penetrance of contact lens wear concurs with market estimates and equates to approximately 680,000 contact lens wearers aged between 15 and 64 years in Australia. The low response rate obtained in this study highlights the difficulty in contemporary use of telephone survey methodology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose : The aim of this study was to develop an innovative, rapid and economical assessment methodology to determine the knowledge, attitudes and behaviours regarding eye health and to determine the rates of the most common causes of visual impairment and undiagnosed eye disease. Methods : Letters were posted to Seniors Card holders aged 70–79 in 18 randomly selected areas, stratified by socio-economic status. A questionnaire was developed to measure knowledge, attitudes and behaviours regarding eye health. Uncorrected refractive error was determined by measuring presenting and best-corrected visual acuity (VA). Diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration were assessed using digital non-mydriatic retinal photography. Glaucoma was assessed using Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) and digital images of the optic nerve head. Cataract was determined using digital retroillumination images of the lens taken with a non-mydriatic camera. The cost for recruiting, examining and grading images for each participant was calculated by dividing the total study cost by the number of participants examined. Results : Of the 13,483 participants invited to participate in the study, appointments were made for 1860 (13.8%) people with 1701 (91%) actually attending. Overall, missing data from the 1695 questionnaires represented less than 1.0% and all participants attended the vision screening over a three-month period. Presenting and best-corrected visual acuity and FDT results on both eyes were obtained on 99% of the sample. The proportion of gradable digital images of the fundus in both eyes in the sample was 89%, while 90% of participants with bilateral presenting VA [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]