1. Combined gemcitabine and S-1 chemotherapy for treating unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized open-label clinical trial.
- Author
-
Li H, Zhang ZY, Zhou ZQ, Guan J, Tong DN, and Zhou GW
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Bile Duct Neoplasms mortality, CA-19-9 Antigen metabolism, Deoxycytidine administration & dosage, Deoxycytidine adverse effects, Deoxycytidine analogs & derivatives, Disease-Free Survival, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Klatskin Tumor mortality, Male, Middle Aged, Oxonic Acid administration & dosage, Oxonic Acid adverse effects, Tegafur administration & dosage, Tegafur adverse effects, Gemcitabine, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Bile Duct Neoplasms drug therapy, Klatskin Tumor drug therapy
- Abstract
Although the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine (GEM) is considered the standard first-line chemotherapy against unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC), its efficacy is discouraging. The present randomized open-label clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the GEM plus S-1 (GEM-S-1) combination against unresectable HC. Twenty-five patients per group were randomly assigned to receive GEM, S-1 or GEM-S-1. Neutropenia (56%) and leukopenia (40%) were the most common chemotherapy-related toxicities in the GEM-S-1 group. Median overall survival (OS) in the GEM-S-1, GEM and S-1 groups was 11, 10 and 6 months, respectively. GEM plus S-1 significantly improved OS compared to S-1 monotherapy (OR=0.68; 95%CI, 0.50-0.90; P=0.008). Median progression-free survival (PFS) times in the GEM-S-1, GEM and S-1 groups were 4.90, 3.70 and 1.60 months, respectively. GEM plus S-1 significantly improved PFS compared to S-1 monotherapy (OR=0.50; 95%CI, 0.27-0.91; P=0.024). Response rates were 36%, 24% and 8% in the GEM-S-1, GEM and S-1 groups, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found in response rates between the gemcitabine-S-1 and S-1 groups (36% vs 8%, P=0.017). Patients with CA19-9<466 U/ml were more responsive to chemotherapeutic agents than those with CA19-9≥571 U/ml (88.9% vs 0%, P<0.001). We conclude that the combination of GEM plus S-1 provides a better OS, PFS and response rate than S-1 monotherapy, but it did not significantly differ from GEM monotherapy. (ChiCTR-TRC-14004733)., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF