Search

This study investigated the value and clinical significance of ultrasound combined with CT in the diagnosis of cystic renal cell carcinoma. A total of 85 patients with cystic renal cell carcinoma, who were admitted to the Oncology Department of Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University from December 2015 to April 2017, were selected as the study group, and 70 patients with benign renal cyst, who were examined in Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, were selected as the benign group. The patients in the two groups were examined by ultrasound and CT. The diagnostic value of ultrasound, CT, and ultrasound combined with CT in cystic renal cell carcinoma was analyzed. The sensitivity of ultrasound combined with CT was significantly higher than that of CT and ultrasound (P<0.05). The specificity and diagnostic coincidence rate of ultrasound combined with CT were significantly higher than those of CT (P<0.05). For unicapsular kidney cancer, there was no significant difference among ultrasound, CT and ultrasound combined with CT in the diagnosis of septum and wall nodule (P>0.05). For polycystic kidney cancer, there was no significant difference among ultrasound, CT and ultrasound combined with CT in the diagnosis of the presence or absence of septum (P>0.05). Ultrasound was significantly better than CT in cyst wall confounding (P<0.05). Ultrasound combined with CT was significantly better than ultrasound in calcification and blood supply of tumors (P<0.05). In conclusion, the accuracy of ultrasound combined with CT is higher than that of ultrasound or that of CT in the diagnosis of cystic renal cell carcinoma, which can be beneficial in accurately carrying out clinical diagnosis, reduce the incidence of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis caused by a single diagnosis and treatment. Ultrasound combined with CT is good for clinical screening and can guide clinical symptomatic treatment, which is worthy of generalizing in clinic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present study explored the clinical value of the protein expression levels of nucleotide binding oligomerization-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 1 (NLRP1) and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain leucine-rich repeat and caspase recruitment domain-containing 4 (NLRC4) inflammasomes in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. A total of 54 patients with prostatic hyperplasia and 58 patients with prostate cancer were recruited at The First People's Hospital of Pinghu between January and May 2022. Immunohistochemical staining was used to determine the protein expression levels of the NLRP1 and NLRC4 inflammasomes in addition to the proinflammatory cytokines IL-18 and IL-1β in the two groups of patients. The protein expression levels of NLRP1 and NLRC4 inflammasome were significantly increased in patients with prostate cancer compared with patients with prostate hyperplasia. The differences in expression of NLRP1 and NLRC4 inflammatory vesicles in prostate cancer of different stages were also compared based on data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The protein expression level of NLRP1 demonstrated a significant positive correlation with IL-1β and IL-18 expression, and the protein expression level of the NLRC4 inflammasome was significantly positively correlated with IL-18 expression. The protein expression levels of both NLRP1 and NLRC4 demonstrated a significant positive correlation with the Gleason score of prostate cancer. The expression of NLRP1 in tumor (T)3/T4 was significantly higher compared with T1 and expression of the NLRC4 inflammasome in T2 and T3/T4 was significantly higher compared with T1. Expression of the NLRP1 and NLRC4 inflammasomes was significantly higher in patients with prostate cancer, compared with patients with prostatic hyperplasia. Therefore, expression of NLRP1 and NLRC4 may promote tumorigenesis by promoting the maturation and release of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18. Expression of the NLRP1 and NLRC4 inflammasomes demonstrated a significant positive correlation with the risk of prostate cancer. Expression of the NLRP1 and NLRC4 inflammasomes in middle- and advanced-stage tumors was higher compared with early-stage tumors. These results suggested that inflammasome expression may serve a significant role in the progression of tumors and could provide a fixed value for the risk assessment and prognosis prediction of prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The imaging performance and clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) combined with CT in diagnosis of liver cancer were investigated. A total of 426 liver cancer patients treated in Yuhuangding Hospital (Yantai, China) from February 2011 to May 2016 were selected. Among them, 222 patients underwent CEUS examination, 204 patients underwent CT examination, and 102 patients underwent CEUS combined with CT examination. Sensitivity and specificity of the three methods were examined. CT showed a low density in 92.6% of patients (189 patients) and a high-low hybrid density in 6.4% (13 patients), with calcification seen in 2.5% of patients (5 patients) and bleeding in 3.4% (7 patients). Lesions: 76.5% (156 cases) of patients with multiple type, 23.5% (48 cases) with single type. CEUS showed overall enhancement in 53.2% patients (118 cases), heterogenous enhancement in 16.7% (37 cases), peripheral enhancement in 18.9% of patients (42 cases), necrosis of liquefaction in 11.3% (25 cases). In 65.3% (145 cases) of patients, the portal venous phase and the delayed phase showed a low enhancement, while 34.7% (77 cases) showed no enhancement. The sensitivity and specificity rates of CEUS combined with CT detection of liver cancer were 87.8, 88.2 and 94.1%, respectively. The ROC curve analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS in the diagnosis of liver cancer were 76.8 and 78.9%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of CT were 81.2 and 85.5%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS combined with CT were 90.4 and 92.7%, respectively. CEUS combined with CT detection can make-up for the defi- ciencies of each other and effectively improve the coincidence rate of liver cancer diagnosis, which can be used as an effective examination method for the diagnosis of liver cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]