Search

Background Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab significantly improved efficacy compared with chemotherapy in patients with advanced endometrial cancer (aEC) regardless of microsatellite instability status or histologic subtype, who had disease progression following prior platinum-based therapy, in Study-309/KEYNOTE-775. The safety profile of the combination was generally consistent with that of each monotherapy drug and of the combination in patients with endometrial cancer and other solid tumors. Given the medical complexity of patients with aEC, this paper aims to characterize key adverse reactions (ARs) of the combination treatment and review management strategies, providing a guide for AR management to maximize anticancer benefits and minimize treatment discontinuation. Materials and Methods In Study-309/KEYNOTE-775, patients received lenvatinib (20 mg orally once daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) or chemotherapy (doxorubicin or paclitaxel). The incidence and median time to the first onset of ARs, dose modifications, and concomitant medications are described. Key ARs characterized include hypothyroidism, hypertension, fatigue, diarrhea, musculoskeletal disorders, nausea, decreased appetite, vomiting, stomatitis, weight decreased, proteinuria, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome. Results As expected, the most common any-grade key ARs included: hypothyroidism, hypertension, fatigue, diarrhea, and musculoskeletal disorders. Grades 3-4 key ARs with incidence ≥10% included: hypertension, fatigue, and weight decreased. Key ARs first occurred within approximately 3 months of treatment initiation. AR management strategies consistent with the prescribing information and the study protocol are discussed. Conclusion Successful AR management strategies for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab include education of the patient and entire treatment team, preventative measures and close monitoring, and judicious use of dose modifications and concomitant medications. Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT03517449 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) refers to a cognitive decline associated with cancer or its treatments. While research into CRCI is expanding, evidence remains scattered due to differences in study designs, methodologies, and definitions. The present umbrella review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current evidence regarding the impact of different breast cancer therapies on cognitive functioning, with a particular focus on the interplay among objective cognitive deficits (ie, measured with standardized tests), subjective cognitive concerns, (ie, self-reported), and other mediating psycho-physical factors. Methods The search was made in Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus for articles published until July 2023, following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis protocol. Results Chemotherapy and endocrine therapy appear consistently associated with CRCI in patients with breast cancer, primarily affecting memory, attention/concentration, executive functioning, and processing speed. Subjective cognitive concerns were often found weakly or not associated with neuropsychological test results, while overall CRCI seemed consistently associated with psychological distress, fatigue, sleep quality, and inflammatory and biological factors. Conclusion Current evidence suggests that CRCI is common after chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for breast cancer. However, heterogeneity in study designs and the scarcity of studies on more recent treatments such as targeted therapies and immunotherapies, highlight the need for more systematic and harmonized studies, possibly taking into account the complex and multifactorial etiology of CRCI. This may provide valuable insights into CRCI's underlying mechanisms and potential new ways to treat it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background In male patients with cancer treated with antineoplastic drug, hypogonadism is a neglected cause of diminished quality of life. This condition may be cancer related as well as toxicity related. The role of antineoplastic drug in causing hypogonadism is poorly understood. The aim of this systematic review was to establish the prevalence, nature (primary/secondary), and impact of hypogonadism on quality of life in male patients with cancer on antineoplastic therapy. Methods The search strategy used PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to select articles in English language that described hypogonadism in male patients with cancer. The search period was from January 1, 1945 to February 28, 2023. We included observational studies, case reports or case series and excluded studies concerning hematological malignancies, prostate cancer, female patients, and survivors. Findings Of 4488 records identified, 28 studies met inclusion criteria (17 observational studies, 11 case reports or case series). Anti-angiogenic drugs and crizotinib were found to have a role in the development of hypogonadism. Patients treated with immune checkpoint-inhibitors developed secondary hypogonadism due to immune-related hypophysitis or orchitis. As for active chemotherapy, platinum salts were often associated with hypogonadism, followed by antimetabolites and taxanes. Selected studies were heterogeneous for populations, interventions, and outcomes assessments. Thus, a generalization is difficult. Moreover, the role of concurrent etiologies cannot be excluded in most studies. Conclusion Our research emphasizes the importance of evaluating the gonadal axis before treatment in patients considered at risk and testing it at regular intervals or in case of clinical suspicion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Our previous work indicated that the addition of lobaplatin to combined therapy with taxane and anthracycline can improve the pathological complete response rate of neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and lengthen long-term survival significantly, but the therapeutic markers of this regimen are unclear. Methods Eighty-three patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in this post hoc analysis. We analyzed the association between platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) before neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the efficacy and prognosis after treatment with docetaxel, epirubicin, and lobaplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. χ2 test and Cox regression were used to analyze the association between PLR and NLR with total pathologic complete response (tpCR), as well as the association between PLR and NLR with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively. Results The tpCR rate in the PLR− group was 49.0% (25/51), which was significantly higher than that in the PLR+ group (25.0% [8/32], P  = .032). The tpCR rate in the NLR− group was 49.1% (26/53), which was significantly higher than that in the NLR+ group (23.3% [7/30], P  = .024). The tpCR rate of the PLR−NLR− (PLR− and NLR−) group was 53.7% (22/41), which was significantly higher than that of the PLR+/NLR+ (PLR+ or/and NLR+) group (26.1% [11/42]; P  = .012). EFS and OS in the NLR+ group were significantly shorter than those in the NLR− group (P  = .028 for EFS; P  = .047 for OS). Patients in the PLR−NLR− group had a longer EFS than those in the PLR+/NLR+ group (P  = .002). Conclusion PLR and NLR could be used to predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy with the taxane, anthracycline, and lobaplatin regimen for patients with TNBC, as patients who had lower PLR and NLR values had a higher tpCR rate and a better long-term prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The treatment of multiple myeloma has evolved significantly over the past few decades with the development of novel therapeutics. The introduction of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, monoclonal antibodies, and high-dose chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has led to improved response rates and survival outcomes. The use of bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is currently under study, and early results are showing promise. Although outcomes for patients with MM have improved with the development of new treatments, there remains a subset of patients with high-risk disease who have a particularly poor prognosis. Therefore, it is critical that future clinical trials focus on developing new therapies specifically for high-risk multiple myeloma. Here we review the literature and provide guidance on treating patients with multiple myeloma for practicing oncologists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Fatigue is common in patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) and can significantly impact quality of life. Melatonin, a safe inexpensive natural supplement, may improve symptoms and attenuate the side effects of RT. The purpose of this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase III trial was to assess the effects of melatonin for preventing fatigue and other symptoms in patients with breast cancer undergoing RT. Methods Female early stage or Ductal carcinoma in situ patients with breast cancer ≥18 years of age with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status <3, hemoglobin ≥9 g/dL, planned for outpatient RT treatment with curative intent, were randomized 1:1 to melatonin 20 mg or placebo, orally, starting the night before RT initiation until 2 weeks post-RT. Randomization was stratified according to treatment duration (<3 weeks, ≥3 weeks) and prior chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue scale), and secondary endpoints were FACIT-F subscales, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores obtained at baseline, and 2 and 8 weeks post-RT. A 2-sided ANOVA F -test at a 4.5% significance level for the primary endpoint was used. Secondary analyses were reported using an F -test at a 5% significance level. The goal was to recruit approximately 140 patients with interim analysis planned mid-recruitment. Results Eighty-five patients were screened for eligibility; 79 patients were randomized: 40 to melatonin and 39 to placebo; 78 patients were treated and included in the interim analysis at the mid-recruitment point. Baseline patient characteristics of age, race, and ECOG performance status were similar in both arms. The treatment effect was studied using a longitudinal mixed effects model with the effect of treatment over time (treatment × time) as the primary outcome parameter. The treatment × time for FACIT-Fatigue did not demonstrate statistical significance (P -value.83) in the melatonin group compared to placebo. In addition, secondary analyses of FACIT physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being scores did not demonstrate statistical significance (P -values of.35,.06,.62, and.71, respectively). Total PROMIS scores, collected as secondary outcome reported by patients, did not demonstrate statistically significant change over time either (P -value is.34). The other secondary scale, ESAS, was analyzed for each individual item and found to be nonsignificant, anxiety (P  = .56), well-being (.82), drowsiness (.83), lack of appetite (.35), nausea (.79), pain (.50), shortness of breath (.77), sleep (.45), and tiredness (.56). Depression was the only item demonstrating statistical significance with a decrease of 0.01 unit in the placebo group, a change not considered clinically significant. Melatonin was well-tolerated with no grade 3 or 4 adverse events reported. The most common side effects were headache, somnolence, and abdominal pain. No patients died while participating in this study. Two patients died within a year of study completion from breast cancer recurrence. Sixteen patients withdrew prior to study completion for various reasons including adverse events, hospitalizations unrelated to study drug, RT discontinuation, and COVID-19 precautions. Conclusions In this double-blind placebo-controlled phase III trial, melatonin did not prevent or significantly improve fatigue and other symptoms in patients with early stage breast cancer undergoing RT. The analysis, showing little evidence of an effect, at mid-recruitment, assured early termination of the trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction FDA's Project Optimus was developed in part to better identify appropriate dose and schedule of cancer therapeutics. The tabular method to summarize patients' maximum toxicity in a clinical trial does not allow for ready comparison to the treatment's benefit. In this manuscript, we apply a simple tool, the weighted toxicity score (WTS), to trials involving lung cancer immunotherapy and chemotherapy, as well as those cited in a recent publication as examples of trials that represent successful reduction of the appropriate dose of anti-cancer agents. Methods PubMed was queried for randomized controlled trials of therapy involving immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer. Trial data from studies highlighting initial success with dose adjustments after FDA approval also were assembled and analyzed according to the WTS procedure described previously, compared to clinical outcomes data. Results The WTS provided, with the clinical outcome(s), a data pair that leads to easy interpretation of the expected benefit versus relative toxicity of studies involving immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in lung cancers. The WTS was consistent with the conclusions of the primary studies, helping to quantitate the toxicity difference between treatments in a previously unavailable way. Conclusion The WTS provides a tool to show the cost in toxicity of therapy in a randomized clinical trial, with applicability to studies involving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or kinase-directed therapy. Inclusion of a running tally of WTS during conduct of a trial could serve as one means to adjust dosing or to provide feedback during data safety monitoring of a clinical trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]