Search

In the field, Spinachia fed on four types of prey; copepods, isopods, mysids and amphipods. As fish size increased, mysids gradually succeeded amphipods as the most important food type in the diet. Prey dimensions and morphometry of the fish's mouth most accurately predicted capture efficiency for amphipods, whereas for mysids capture efficiency was determined by the prey's escape response and the fish's fast-start capability. Responses to model prey revealed the ability of fish to differentiate among contrasting prey characteristics, resulting in the adoption of appropriate predatory tactics. Amphipods were associated with a shorter gut evacuation time than mysids, although approximately equal proportions of energy were absorbed from each. Similar rations of mysids and amphipods were required to satiate fish. The lower energy content per unit dry mass of amphipods was off set by their lower water content. From pre-digestive behaviour, we predicted that mysids were more profitable than amphipods, and this was reflected in the fish's choice. Conversely, incorporating the net rate of energy uptake by the gut led us to predict that amphipods were more profitable. Although physiological constraints clearly influence the net rate of energy uptake, it appears that dietary preferences are based on pre-digestive predatory behaviour and hence on time minimisation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]