Search

The female reproductive tract undergoes dynamic changes across the life span. Congenital abnormalities, life events, and medical interventions can negatively affect the structure and function of reproductive tract organs, resulting in lifelong sequelae. The objective of regenerative gynecology is to discover and promote endogenous mechanisms by which a healthy tissue maintains overall tissue integrity after injury, after disease, or with age. In this review, we discuss some of the key state-of-the-art cell-based and scaffolding therapies that have been applied to regenerate gynecologic tissues and organs primarily in animal and tissue culture models. We further discuss the limitations of current technologies, problems of implementation and scalability, and future outlook of the field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is an urgent need to diversify the physician workforce in obstetrics and gynecology to serve a diverse patient population and mitigate disparities in care. There is a paucity of data on how to improve recruitment of individuals from underrepresented minoritized groups to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. This article outlines important steps for sharing the department's commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion; addresses ways to attract a diverse applicant pool; and reviews the importance of and need to perform a holistic review of applicants. This commentary also shares some approaches to support faculty and trainees that may lead to sustained increases in diversity. Using this framework, the authors successfully increased the diversity of their obstetrics and gynecology residency program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current practices in the U.S. health care industry drive climate change. This review summarizes the vast research on the negative health effects of the climate crisis on patients as relevant to obstetrics and gynecology. We further propose solutions to decarbonize operating rooms, labor and delivery units, and nurseries and neonatal intensive care units through evidence-based reduction in our single-use supply, energy, and water, as well as anesthetic gases and appropriate waste sorting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To explore the association of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs) decision on future practice locations of graduating obstetrics and gynecology residents. METHODS: This is a mixed-methods survey study of obstetrics and gynecology residents graduating from sites with Ryan Program abortion training programs (109 sites) between March 8, 2023, and April 25, 2023. We conducted both univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify factors that were associated with post-Dobbs change in career plans, particularly location. We also performed a thematic analysis using responses to the survey's optional, open-ended prompt, "Please describe how the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision impacted your professional plans." RESULTS: Of an estimated 724 residents graduating from residencies with Ryan Program abortion training programs, 349 participated in the survey (48.2% response rate); 17.6% of residents indicated that the Dobbs decision changed the location of intended future practice or fellowship plans. Residents who before the Dobbs decision intended to practice in abortion-restrictive states were eight times more likely to change their practice plans than those who planned to practice in protected states before the Dobbs decision (odds ratio 8.52, 95% CI 3.81-21.0). In a thematic analysis of open-ended responses, 90 residents wrote responses related to "not living in a state with abortion restrictions." Of residents pursuing fellowship, 36 indicated that they did not rank or ranked lower programs in restrictive states. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate reduced desire of residents in obstetrics and gynecology to practice or pursue fellowship in restrictive states after residency. This reduction in obstetrics and gynecology workforce could significantly exacerbate maternity care deserts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objectives of this study were to evaluate how obstetrics and gynecology residency program directors used applicant signaling and to understand how two tiers of signals influenced interviews, ranking, and matching into programs. A multimethod, deductive-sequential design was employed using a national survey of residency program directors and a convenience sampling of programs to study how obstetrics and gynecology program directors used program signals in the 2022-2023 residency-application cycle. A total of 80.5% (236/293) of program directors receiving the survey provided information about signaling, and 20 programs provided application outcome data for applicants who signaled them. The majority of program directors (86.9%) opted into signaling, 43.4% used signals as part of their initial screening, and 33.1% used it as a tiebreaker after reviewing applications, with 45.4% feeling it improved their ability to conduct a holistic review and 41.5% inviting applicants they may not have invited previously. Among programs providing applicant data, the influence of signals on the chances of an applicant being interviewed varied, but an overall strong positive effect of signaling was observed across the sample. The mean rank was 42 for gold signals, 45 for silver, and 38 for no signal (F(3)=5.97, PC001). Signaling was widely used by programs and was an effective tool to allow applicants to communicate real interest in a program. Signaling was associated with an increased likelihood of an applicant's being interviewed but did not influence an applicant's position on the rank list. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is growing evidence that language discordance between patients and their health care teams negatively affects quality of care, experience of care, and health outcomes, yet there is limited guidance on best practices for advancing equitable care for patients who have language barriers within obstetrics and gynecology. In this commentary, we present two cases of languagediscordant care and a framework for addressing language as a critical lens for health inequities in obstetrics and gynecology, which includes a variety of clinical settings such as labor and delivery, perioperative care, outpatient clinics, and inpatient services, as well as sensitivity around reproductive health topics. The proposed framework explores drivers of language-related inequities at the clinician, health system, and societal level. We end with actionable recommendations for enhancing equitable care for patients experiencing language barriers. Because language and communication barriers undergird other structural drivers of inequities in reproductive health outcomes, we urge obstetrician–gynecologists to prioritize improving care for patients experiencing language barriers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Steering Committee for the Obstetrics & Gynecology special edition titled “Racism in Reproductive Health: Lighting a Path to Health Equity” formed a working group to create an equity rubric. The goal was to provide a tool to help researchers systematically center health equity as they conceptualize, design, analyze, interpret, and evaluate research in obstetrics and gynecology. This commentary reviews the rationale, iterative process, and literature guiding the creation of the equity rubric. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To assess the change in competitiveness of obstetrics and gynecology programs over 20 years using a normalized competitive index. METHODS: Obstetrics and gynecology match data were obtained from the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) for 2003–2022. Applicant metrics (United States Medical Licensing Examination scores, score percentiles, research output and experiences, and work and volunteer experiences) were obtained from the NRMP and the Association of American Medical Colleges (2007–2021). The competitive index was calculated using the number of positions available divided by match rate each year between 2003 and 2022. The normalized competitive index was calculated by dividing the yearly competitive index by the average competitive index over 20 years. Data were analyzed using univariate analysis and linear regressions. RESULTS: When comparing the two decades (2003–2012 vs 2013–2022), applicants (1,539±242 vs 1,902±144; P<.001), positions (1,173±31 vs 1,345±98; P<.001), and number of programs ranked per applicant (13±1.4 vs 15±0.6; P<.001) have increased. While the match rate did not significantly change from 2003 to 2022 (75.5%±9.9% vs 70.5%±1.6%; P=.14), the normalized competitive index increased (R²=0.92, P<.001), indicating increased competitiveness. Applicant metrics increased over time, including research output (2.4±0.8 vs 5.0±0.7; P=.002) and work experiences (2.9±0.2 vs 3.6±0.1; P=.002; R²=0.98, P<.001). CONCLUSION: Despite an increase in obstetrics and gynecology applicants and applicant metrics, match rates remain unchanged. However, the competitiveness of programs has significantly increased, as demonstrated by the normalized competitive index, applicants per position, and applicant metrics. The normalized competitive index is a useful metric for applicants to determine program or applicant competitiveness, especially when used alongside applicant metrics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article "Real-World Utilization of an Intrauterine, Vacuum-Induced, Hemorrhage-Control Device: Correction" addresses errors in a previous publication regarding serious adverse events and device effects. The corrections clarify specific details in the Results section and provide a corrected version of Figure 2. Similarly, the article "ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline No. 3: Headaches in Pregnancy and Postpartum: Correction" highlights inaccuracies in the text related to metoclopramide and diphenhydramine administration for primary headaches during pregnancy. Both corrections aim to ensure accurate information dissemination in obstetrics and gynecology research. [Extracted from the article]

Job task analyses provide unbiased, objective evidence that reproductive health care and abortion are essential to the practice of obstetrics and gynecology. A social contract exists between medicine and society. In fulfilling the social contract to our patients and society, physicians have an obligation to provide the evidence-based care that patients want and need. What do the data regarding knowledge, judgment, and skills required to practice obstetrics and gynecology show? Obstetrics and gynecology job task analyses assess the importance of knowledge, judgment, and skills through surveys asking practicing physicians about the criticality and frequency of a variety of task statements to create an importance score. Excerpts from a 2018 practice analysis survey clearly indicate that reproductive health care and abortion are important components of the knowledge, judgment, and skills to practice obstetrics and gynecology in the United States. These standards help to assure the knowledge, judgment, and skills of current and future generations of ob-gyns, so their patients and the public can be provided the comprehensive reproductive health care they want and need. It is sometimes important to restate principles and standards that have become ingrained in thoughts and practices that guide physicians and serve to protect our patients. This concept is important now, as our country, health care professionals, and patients examine the future of reproductive health care, including abortion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The transition to residency in obstetrics and gynecology is difficult, threatening the well-being of residents as well as their preparedness to care for patients. In addition to essential foundational knowledge and skills, obstetrics and gynecology interns must develop professional identity and a growth mindset toward learning to acquire the self-directed learning skills required of physicians throughout their careers. The transition to residency is a critical opportunity for learning and development. A group of educators and learners from around the country created a preparedness program building on available resources. The result is a national curriculum for improving the transition to obstetrics and gynecology residency on three levels: self-directed learning, facilitated small-group workshops, and coaching. Sharing tools for preparing matched applicants for residency in obstetrics and gynecology ensures adequate residency preparation for all interns, independent of medical school attended. This program aims to address potential threats to equity in the training of our future workforce and to ensure that all obstetrics and gynecology interns are prepared to thrive in residency training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document is a correction notice from the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology. It includes corrections for three different articles published in the journal. The corrections address errors in author names and sentences within the abstracts of the articles. The corrections ensure the accuracy of the information presented in the articles. [Extracted from the article]

For reasons ranging from the emergence of duty-hour restrictions to a broader focus on primary care, the graduating obstetrics and gynecology resident today does not have the same surgical experiential numbers as residents who graduated before 2000. Graph: Warner K. Huh, MD Graph: Fidel A. Valea, MD Graph: Eva Chalas, MD Graph: Stephanie V. Blank, MD More than 50 years ago, the subspecialty of gynecologic oncology was established to provide patients with gynecologic cancer a multidisciplinary, longitudinal model of care, including expertise in complex surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: To perform a quality-improvement project to increase the rate at which expedited partner therapy is offered and prescribed at our clinic, in line with Connecticut Department of Public Health regulations.Methods: We conducted quality-improvement interventions at an urban hospital-based outpatient clinic in Hartford, Connecticut, to improve prescribing of expedited partner therapy to at least 70% of eligible patients. We defined appropriate provision of expedited partner therapy by infection type (gonorrhea or chlamydia only per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines) and method of prescription per Connecticut Department of Public Health regulations (paper prescription or in-clinic dispensing).Results: Rates of appropriate provision of expedited partner therapy improved with our interventions (21.6% vs 75.5%). We found an unexpected decrease in acceptance by patients after initiation of our interventions (81.3% vs 50.5%).Conclusion: We achieved our goal of improvement of rates of appropriate provision of expedited partner therapy to greater than 70% and have maintained this improvement over time. Future work should investigate potential barriers to expedited partner therapy acceptance, including type of infection, the effect of Department of Public Health regulation of prescribing options, and standard workflow in patient counseling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision on Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization, a direct challenge to Roe v Wade. A detailed policy analysis by the Guttmacher Institute projects that, if Roe v Wade is overturned, 21 states are certain to ban abortion and five states are likely to ban abortion. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires access to abortion training for all obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. We performed a comprehensive study of all accredited U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residency programs to assess how many of these programs and trainees are currently located in states projected to ban abortion if Roe v Wade is overturned. We found that, of 286 accredited obstetrics and gynecology residency programs with current residents, 128 (44.8%) are in states certain or likely to ban abortion if Roe v Wade is overturned. Therefore, of 6,007 current obstetrics and gynecology residents, 2,638 (43.9%) are certain or likely to lack access to in-state abortion training. Preparation for the reversal of Roe v Wade should include not only a recognition of the negative effects on patient access to abortion care in affected states, but also of the dramatic implications for obstetrics and gynecology residency training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transgender individuals face discrimination in several contexts and spaces, which exacerbates dysphoria and disparities in mental and physical well-being. Gender-exclusionary environments in the health care system lead to limitations in access to care and unaddressed health care needs. The full spectrum of gender is often not recognized in the field of medicine, which is predicated on the binary of male and female. Obstetrics and gynecology is societally viewed as a field for cisgender women, but transgender individuals can, and do, benefit from services offered by obstetricians and gynecologists. It is imperative that all specialties consider which aspects of care can be altered to promote the safety and health care of medically marginalized groups, including transgender patients. Alternative vocabulary to gendered language commonly used in medicine is discussed in three contexts: patient counseling, medical records, and institutional language. Understanding and using gender-inclusive language is an important step to create safer, respectful, affirming spaces for transgender people to receive medical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To characterize gynecology clinical trials over time, compare gynecology subspecialties, and analyze factors associated with early discontinuation, results reporting, and publication.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of all gynecology trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between 2007 and 2020 and their resulting publications. Trials were analyzed with descriptive, multivariable logistic, and Cox regression analyses. Primary exposure variables were trial funding and subspecialty. The three primary outcomes included early discontinuation, results reporting to ClinicalTrials.gov, and publication in a peer-reviewed journal indexed on PubMed.Results: Of 223,690 trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between October 2007 and March 2020, only 3.7% focused on gynecology (n=8,174, approximately 3,759,086 participants). Subspecialties included reproductive endocrinology and infertility (n=1,428, 17.5%), gynecologic oncology (n=2,063, 25.2%), urogynecology (n=1,118, 13.7%), family planning (n=648, 7.9%), and other benign gynecology (n=2,917, 35.7%). Only 42.0% of completed trials disseminated results through results reporting and publication. Of all funding types, industry-funded trials were the most likely to be discontinued early (P<.001). Academic-funded trials were the least likely to report results (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.38, 95% CI 0.30-0.50) but the most likely to publish (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.24-2.12). The number of reproductive endocrinology and infertility trials increased the most of any subspecialty between 2007 and 2020 (6.4% growth rate). Reproductive endocrinology and infertility and family planning trials were the most likely to be stopped early (reproductive endocrinology and infertility: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.08, 95% CI 1.59-2.71; family planning: aHR 1.55 95% CI 1.06-2.25). When completed, reproductive endocrinology and infertility trials were the least likely to report results (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.88). No significant differences were seen between subspecialties with respect to publication.Conclusion: Gynecology trials comprise only 3.7% of all clinical trials. The paucity of gynecology clinical trials aligns with decades of female underrepresentation in research. When completed, gynecology trials have poor dissemination. Our findings raise concern about bias in the performance, reporting, and publication of gynecology clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Abortion restrictions affect not only provision of abortion care but also experience for trainees. Data from the 2023 match showed a decrease in obstetrics and gynecology residency applications in restrictive states. Our national survey of medical students applying to obstetrics and gynecology residency sought to assess the effects of the Dobbs decision on their application process. METHODS: Medical students who applied to obstetrics and gynecology residency for the 2023 match were surveyed via an electronic questionnaire. Convenience sampling was used. Institutional review board waiver was granted. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-eight students, from 39 different states, completed the survey. The average age was 27.8 years, and the majority identified as women (89%) and White (80.9%). The majority (72.7%) of respondents reported that the Dobbs decision influenced which residency programs they applied to, and of those, 96.9% report that they applied to programs in states with fewer abortion restrictions. Similarly, 66.5% reported that the decision influenced their rank list, and of those, 98.3% report they ranked programs in states that are less restrictive on abortion services higher. CONCLUSION: Access to abortion training was identified as important to a majority of survey respondents. Students reported applying to states with less abortion restrictions and that access to abortion training influenced their rank list. Prior studies have surveyed third- and fourth-year students about predicted effects of the Dobbs decision on residency applications. This is the first to assess perspectives among students who completed the residency application process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the digital age of the 21st century, we have witnessed an explosion in data matched by remarkable progress in the field of computer science and engineering, with the development of powerful and portable artificial intelligence-powered technologies. At the same time, global connectivity powered by mobile technology has led to an increasing number of connected users and connected devices. In just the past 5 years, the convergence of these technologies in obstetrics and gynecology has resulted in the development of innovative artificial intelligence-powered digital health devices that allow easy and accurate patient risk stratification for an array of conditions spanning early pregnancy, labor and delivery, and care of the newborn. Yet, breakthroughs in artificial intelligence and other new and emerging technologies currently have a slow adoption rate in medicine, despite the availability of large data sets that include individual electronic health records spanning years of care, genomics, and the microbiome. As a result, patient interactions with health care remain burdened by antiquated processes that are inefficient and inconvenient. A few health care institutions have recognized these gaps and, with an influx of venture capital investments, are now making in-roads in medical practice with digital products driven by artificial intelligence algorithms. In this article, we trace the history, applications, and ethical challenges of the artificial intelligence that will be at the forefront of digitally transforming obstetrics and gynecology and medical practice in general. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recognized the need for educational materials for clinicians on the prevention and early diagnosis of gynecologic cancers. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists convened a panel of experts in evidence review from the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology and content experts from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology to review relevant literature, best practices, and existing practice guidelines for the development of evidence-based educational materials for women's health care clinicians about uterine cancer. This article is the evidence summary of the literature review of health disparities and inequities related to uterine cancer. Substantive knowledge gaps are noted and summarized to provide guidance for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The proposed changes to obstetrics and gynecology fellowship start dates have unintended consequences that introduce inequity in the fellowship-training process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We performed a retrospective cohort study of all Type 1 cesarean scar pregnancies (n=18) or cervical pregnancies (n=5) at an academic tertiary center after treatment with a cervical double balloon catheter from 2018 to 2022 to evaluate outcomes and maternal morbidity. Cervical double balloon catheter treatment was associated with no cases (95% confidence interval 0-16%) of maternal hemorrhage treated with transfusion, hysterectomy, or ICU admission. Treatment was successfully performed by nine different obstetrics and gynecology specialists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In these placebo-controlled, randomized, double blind trials, which used identical protocols, symptom improvement was rapid and clinically meaningful, with significant improvement in uterine leiomyoma-associated symptoms during 24 weeks of daily oral relugolix combination therapy. Relugolix combination therapy was also reported to be well tolerated and effective in reduction of endometriosis-associated pain in the SPIRIT 1 and 2 trials.[7] Similar to relugolix, elagolix is a GnRH antagonist, which was first approved for the management of moderate-to-severe endometriosis-related pain. Further, the bone resorption and vasomotor symptoms that had been associated with GnRH antagonist monotherapy without add-back hormones were ameliorated.[6] Al-Hendy et al established that extended 52-week relugolix combination therapy can sustain the improvement in uterine leiomyoma-associated heavy menstrual bleeding. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: To assess the risk for obstetric complications in women with congenital uterine anomalies and the risk in each main class of uterine anomaly (U2 [septate], U3 [bicorporeal], U4 [hemi-uterus]), based on the 2013 classification by the ESHRE (European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology) and the ESGE (European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy).Data Sources: MEDLINE, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception until January 2021. The reference list of all included articles and previous systematic reviews were also screened to identify potential additional articles.Methods Of Study Selection: Comparative and noncomparative studies that investigated the obstetric outcomes of women with any type of known congenital uterine anomaly were considered eligible for inclusion. Screening and eligibility assessment was performed independently by two reviewers.Tabulation, Integration, and Results: Forty-seven studies were included. The quality of included comparative studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Odds ratios (ORs), pooled proportions of each obstetric outcome, and 95% CIs were calculated in RevMan and Stata accordingly, using random effects models. Congenital uterine anomalies were associated with increased risk of preterm birth (OR 3.89, 95% CI 3.11-4.88); cervical insufficiency (OR 15.13, 95% CI 11.74-19.50); prelabor rupture of membranes (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.38-4.48); fetal malpresentation (OR 11.11, 95% CI 5.74-21.49); fetal growth restriction (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.88-7.46); placental abruption (OR 5.21, 95% CI 3.34-8.13); placenta previa (OR 4.00, 95% CI 1.87-8.56); placental retention (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.16-2.52); and cesarean birth (OR 4.52, 95% CI 2.19-9.31); when compared with those without anomalies. Pooled estimated risks were 25% for preterm birth, 40% for fetal malpresentation, 64% for cesarean birth, 12% for prelabor rupture of membranes, 15% for fetal growth restriction, 4% for placental abruption, 5% for preeclampsia, 13% for cervical insufficiency, and 2% for placenta previa. Classes U2 (septate), U3 (bicorporeal), and U4 (hemi-uterus) were also associated independently with preterm birth, fetal malpresentation, cesarean birth, and placental abruption.Conclusion: Congenital uterine anomalies are associated with obstetric complications across all examined ESHRE and ESGE classifications.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42021244487. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

More PGY-4 residents in programs with routine abortion care training felt competent in all early pregnancy loss management options and in managing early pregnancy loss complications than those in programs with no training (Table 1). Residents with optional abortion training were more likely to intend to provide manual uterine aspiration for early pregnancy loss care than those with no training (odds ratio 1.67, 95% CI 1.0-2.78, P=.05). [Extracted from the article]

Maternal mortality and morbidity continue to occur at unacceptably high levels in the United States, with communities of color experiencing significantly higher rates than their White counterparts, even after adjustment for confounding factors such as socioeconomic status. Many obstetrics and gynecology departments across the country have begun to incorporate routine discussion and analysis of health equity into peer review and educational processes, including grand rounds and morbidity and mortality conferences. Despite the desire and drive, there is little published guidance on best practices for incorporation of an equity component into these conferences. This document outlines the current processes at four academic institutions to highlight the variety of ways in which health equity and social justice can be incorporated when analyzing patient experiences and health outcomes. This commentary also provides a list of specific recommendations based on the combined experiences at these institutions so that others across the country can incorporate principles of health equity into their peer-review processes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) serve as the pillar of evidence-based medicine and guide medical practice. Compromised data integrity in RCTs undermines the authority of this valuable tool for science and puts patients at risk. Although a large number of retractions due to data issues in obstetrics and gynecology have occurred in the past few years, many problematic RCTs could still go uncovered because in general there is insufficient willingness to envisage and confront research misconduct. In this article, we discuss the necessity of assessing research misconduct, summarize methods that have been applied in detecting previous cases of misconduct, and propose potential solutions. There is no established mechanism to monitor feedback on published articles and the current system that handles potential research misconduct is unsatisfactory. Fortunately, there are methods to assess data integrity in RCTs both with and without individual participant data. Investigations into research misconduct can be facilitated by assessing all publications from a leading author or author group to identify duplication and patterns of ongoing misconduct. There is a pressing need to improve the mechanism that investigates data manipulation. The mechanism that handles misconduct should prioritize the interests of patients and readers rather than trial authors and their institutions. An equally urgent issue is to establish mechanisms that prevent compromised trials from polluting evidence synthesis or misguiding practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the setting of long-standing structural racism in health care, it is imperative to highlight inequities in the medical school-to-residency transition. In obstetrics and gynecology, the percentage of Black residents has decreased in the past decade. The etiology for this troubling decrease is unknown, but racial and ethnic biases inherent in key residency application metrics are finally being recognized, while the use of these metrics to filter applicants is increasing. Now is the time for action and for transformational change to rectify the factors that are detrimentally affecting the racial diversity of our residents. This will benefit our patients and learners with equitable health care and better outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Inequitable outcomes in sexual and reproductive health disproportionately burden communities minoritized by systems of oppression. Although there is evidence linking structural determinants to these inequities, clinical learners have limited exposure to these topics in their training. We developed a curriculum aimed to teach clinical learners the structural determinants of sexual and reproductive health.Method: We implemented Kern's six-step method for curriculum development. Through literature review, we identified structural competency as the foundational framework and explored community priorities for clinical training. We assessed learner needs regarding structural equity training, articulated goals and objectives, and chose video modules as the primary educational strategy. We collaboratively developed content with community scholars and reproductive justice advocates. For phase 1 of our curriculum, we created pillar videos with reflection questions, resources, and a visual glossary of key terms. All materials are available through an online educational platform offering open-access, evidence-based curricula.Experience: We launched our curriculum with a social media campaign and presented our videos at several national convenings. We implemented videos with clinical learners with positive preliminary evaluation results.Conclusion: With rigorous development rooted in community engagement, our curriculum contributes to the tools promoting structural equity training in obstetrics and gynecology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although reproductive injustices and reproductive health disparities are well-documented in the United States, recent studies have begun to explore the health care professional's role in their perpetuation. We hypothesized that obstetrics and gynecology residents would observe reproductive injustices during their training. Thus, using a national survey, we asked obstetrics and gynecology residents to share clinical cases in which discrimination, bias, inequity, or injustice was involved in a patient's reproductive health care and queried their preparedness to respond. Through qualitative analysis, we found that respondents shared cases involving racism, discrimination, and structural barriers to care and that they felt poorly equipped to handle injustice. We call for clinician educators to combat reproductive injustice through three key changes to obstetrics and gynecology residency training: 1) incorporate reproductive justice training into formal residency education; 2) create safe spaces for residents to collectively debrief about their experiences with injustice and collaborate on care improvement; and 3) teach community engagement and advocacy skills that identify, center, and elevate local reproductive health priorities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Meeting the ethical obligations of informed consent requires that an obstetrician-gynecologist gives the patient adequate, accurate, and understandable information and requires that the patient has the ability to understand and reason through this information and is free to ask questions and to make an intentional and voluntary choice, which may include refusal of care or treatment. Shared decision making is a patient-centered, individualized approach to the informed consent process that involves discussion of the benefits and risks of available treatment options in the context of a patient's values and priorities. Some informed consent challenges are universal to medicine, whereas other challenges arise more commonly in the practice of obstetrics and gynecology than in other specialty areas. This Committee Opinion focuses on informed consent for adult patients in clinical practice and provides new guidance on the practical application of informed consent through shared decision making. The principles outlined in this Committee Opinion will help support the obstetrician-gynecologist in the patient-centered informed consent process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2006;33:305-23. doi: 2 Leonardi M, Luketic L, Sobel ML, Toor K, D'Souza R, Murji A. Evaluation of obstetrics & gynecology ultrasound curriculum and self-reported competency of final-year Canadian residents. The current state of ultrasound training in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. [Extracted from the article]

Holistic review of residency applications is touted as the gold standard for selection, yet vast application numbers leave programs reliant on screening using filters such as United States Medical Licensing Examination scores that do not reliably predict resident performance and may threaten diversity. Applicants struggle to identify which programs to apply to, and devote attention to these processes throughout most of the fourth year, distracting from their clinical education. In this perspective, educators across the undergraduate and graduate medical education continuum propose new models for student-program compatibility based on design thinking sessions with stakeholders in obstetrics and gynecology education from a broad range of training environments. First, we describe a framework for applicant-program compatibility based on applicant priorities and program offerings, including clinical training, academic training, practice setting, residency culture, personal life, and professional goals. Second, a conceptual model for applicant screening based on metrics, experiences, attributes, and alignment with program priorities is presented that might facilitate holistic review. We call for design and validation of novel metrics, such as situational judgment tests for professionalism. Together, these steps could improve the transparency, efficiency and fidelity of the residency application process. The models presented can be adapted to the priorities and values of other specialties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess whether a pediatric and adolescent gynecology electronic learning (eLearning) module improves knowledge and clinical performance among obstetrics and gynecology residents.Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial across four university programs; three had pediatric and adolescent gynecology rotations, and two had pediatric and adolescent gynecology fellowship-trained faculty. Applying permutated block randomization, residents were randomized to no intervention or completion of a validated eLearning module on prepubertal bleeding. All residents subsequently completed a pediatric and adolescent gynecology-related knowledge assessment that queried understanding of prepubertal bleeding and an objective structured clinical examination that assessed history collection, performance of a prepubertal genital examination, vaginal culture, and vaginoscopy for a pediatric patient. Objective structured clinical examinations were videotaped and reviewed by two faculty, blinded to randomization group; interrater reliability score was 97%. We calculated descriptive frequencies and compared randomization groups using χ analyses and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables, and median tests for continuous variables; a value of P<.05 was considered significant.Results: From July 2018 to June 2019, we invited 115 residents to participate; 97 (83%) completed both objective structured clinical examination and follow-up knowledge assessments. Most were female (91%) and the majority reported limited pediatric and adolescent gynecology didactic or clinical experience, with 36% reporting prior didactics on prepubertal vaginal bleeding and 33% reporting prior exposure to the prepubertal genital examination. Forty-five participants (46%) were randomized to the module and groups were similar across training levels. Residents assigned to the module scored significantly higher on the knowledge assessment (4/5 vs 2/5, P<.001) and objective structured clinical examination (13/16 vs 7/16, P<.001) and were more likely to avoid a speculum in the examination of a pediatric patient (95.6% vs 57.7%, P<.001).Conclusion: Our pediatric and adolescent gynecology eLearning module resulted in improved short-term resident knowledge and simulated clinical skills among obstetrics and gynecology residents. Applying this learning technique in other programs may help address deficiencies in pediatric and adolescent gynecology education and training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Shortly after its inception, the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology recognized that no data described the composition and faculty activities of "academic generalist divisions." Consequently, in 2018, the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology appointed a presidential task force and conducted the current surveys of chairs and division directors and key informant interviews to understand the composition and faculty activities in divisions of academic specialists in departments of obstetrics and gynecology and propose criteria for excellence in each mission area to guide development of divisions. In 2014, with Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology's guidance, these divisions were referred to as academic specialists divisions and the faculty within as academic specialists to emphasize that they provide specialized women's health care in academic settings. The divisions comprised approximately 30% of departments' full-time faculty (median 12). In 27% of the departments, these divisions contributed more than half of departmental revenue, and 49% contributed 26-50%. Nearly 90% of divisions provided a sizeable proportion of the department's total teaching efforts. Compensation relied more on clinical productivity than on seniority, quality, academic contributions, or academic rank. Subsequently, five performance domains were identified to help divisions define divisional excellence: clinical, education, research, service & advocacy, and academic environment. Furthermore, excellent divisions were characterized as those with outstanding clinicians and educators who emphasize scholarly productivity. Although academic specialists contribute significantly to their departments' financial, clinical, and educational productivity, many have limited opportunities for scholarly activity. Achieving divisional excellence likely will depend on the ability to recruit and retain faculty with career expectations that align with the division's prioritized performance domains. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To use the Messick validity framework for a simulation-based assessment of vaginal hysterectomy skills.Methods: Video recordings of physicians at different levels of training and experience performing vaginal hysterectomy on a high-fidelity vaginal surgery model were objectively assessed using a modified 10-item Vaginal Surgical Skills Index, a one-item global scale of overall performance, and a pass-fail criterion. Participants included obstetrics and gynecology trainees and faculty from five institutions. Video recordings were independently assessed by expert surgeons blinded to the identities of the study participants.Results: Fifty surgeons (11 faculty, 39 trainees) were assessed. Experience level correlated strongly with both the modified Vaginal Surgical Skills Index and global scale score, with more experienced participants receiving higher scores (Pearson r=0.81, P<.001; Pearson r=0.74, P<.001). Likewise, surgical experience was also moderately correlated with the modified Vaginal Surgical Skills Index and global scale score (Pearson r=0.55, P<.001; Pearson r=0.58, P<.001). The internal consistency of the modified Vaginal Surgical Skills Index was excellent (Cronbach's alpha=0.97). Interrater reliability of the modified Vaginal Surgical Skills Index and global scale score, as measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient, was moderate to good (0.49-0.95; 0.50-0.87). Using the receiver operating characteristic curve and the pass-fail criterion, a modified Vaginal Surgical Skills Index cutoff score of 27 was found to most accurately (area under the curve 0.951, 95% CI 0.917-0.983) differentiate competent from noncompetent surgeons.Conclusion: We demonstrated validity evidence for using a high-fidelity vaginal surgery model with the modified Vaginal Surgical Skills Index or global scale score to assess vaginal hysterectomy skills. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To define and assess the prevalence of potentially life-threatening gynecologic emergencies among women presenting for acute pelvic pain for the purpose of developing measures to audit quality of care in emergency departments.Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods multicenter study at gynecologic emergency departments in France and Belgium. A modified Delphi procedure was first conducted in 2014 among health care professionals to define relevant combinations of potentially life-threatening conditions and near misses in the field of gynecologic emergency care. A prospective case-cohort study in the spring of 2015 then assessed the prevalence of these potentially life-threatening emergencies and near misses among women of reproductive age presenting for acute pelvic pain. Women in the case group were identified at 21 participating centers. The control group consisted of a sample of women hospitalized for acute pelvic pain not caused by a potentially life-threatening condition and a 10% random sample of outpatients.Results: Eight gynecologic emergencies and 17 criteria for near misses were identified using the Delphi procedure. Among the 3,825 women who presented for acute pelvic pain, 130 (3%) were considered to have a potentially life-threatening condition. The most common diagnoses were ectopic pregnancies with severe bleeding (n=54; 42%), complex pelvic inflammatory disease (n=30; 23%), adnexal torsion (n=20; 15%), hemorrhagic miscarriage (n=15; 12%), and severe appendicitis (n=6; 5%). The control group comprised 225 hospitalized women and 381 outpatients. Diagnostic errors occurred more frequently among women with potentially life-threatening emergencies than among either hospitalized (odds ratio [OR] 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.7) or outpatient (OR 14.7, 95% CI 8.1-26.8) women in the control group. Of the women with potentially life-threatening conditions, 26 met near-miss criteria compared with six with not potentially life-threatening conditions (OR 25.6, 95% CI 10.9-70.7).Conclusions: Potentially life-threatening gynecologic emergencies are high-risk conditions that may serve as a useful framework to improve quality and safety in emergency care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vulvar skin disorders include a variety of inflammatory conditions of the vulva that also may affect the extragenital area. Pruritus and pain are two of the most common presenting symptoms in vulvar clinics (). Vulvovaginal symptoms often are chronic and can adversely affect sexual function and sense of well-being. The purpose of this Practice Bulletin is to provide updated diagnostic and management recommendations for the most common vulvar skin conditions associated with inflammation: contact dermatitis, lichen simplex chronicus, lichen sclerosus, and lichen planus. Other vulvovaginal disorders such as vaginitis, vulvar low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (previously termed vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia), genitourinary syndrome of menopause (vulvovaginal atrophy), and vulvar pain (vulvodynia) are addressed in other documents from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate differences in standardized scores and surgical confidence in the completion of a standardized total laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TLH-BSO) among obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) with different levels of training, and to assess a TLH-BSO model for validity.Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 68 participants within four categories of ob-gyns: 1) graduating or recently graduated residents (n=18), 2) minimally invasive gynecologic surgery graduating or recently graduated fellows (n=16), 3) specialists in general obstetrics and gynecology (n=15), and 4) fellowship-trained minimally invasive gynecologic surgery subspecialists (n=19) who completed a TLH-BSO simulation. Participants completed presimulation questionnaires assessing laparoscopic confidence. Participants performed a video-recorded TLH-BSO and contained specimen removal on a standardized 250-g biological model in a simulated operating room and completed a postsimulation questionnaire.Results: Randomized videos were scored by blinded experts using the validated OSATS (Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills). The surgery was divided into five standardized segments: 1) adnexa, 2) dissection and pedicles, 3) colpotomy, 4) cuff closure, and 5) tissue extraction. Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery subspecialists averaging 8.9 years in practice scored highest in all categories (overall median score 91%, P<.001), followed by fellows (64%, P<.001), specialists in obstetrics and gynecology averaging 19.7 years in practice (63%, P<.001), and residents (56%, P<.001). Residents, fellows and specialists in obstetrics and gynecology were comparable overall. Fellows scored higher on cuff closure (63% vs 50%, P<.03) and tissue extraction (77% vs 60%, P<.009) compared with specialists in obstetrics and gynecology. Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery subspecialists were fastest overall and on each individual component. Residents were slowest in almost all categories.Conclusion: When performing a TLH-BSO of a standardized 250-g uterus on a simulation model, fellowship-trained minimally invasive gynecologic surgery subspecialists achieved higher OSATS in all areas and completed all components faster. Similar performances were noted between residents, fellows, and specialists in obstetrics and gynecology in practice an average of 19.7 years.Funding Source: Support from Applied Medical, Medtronic, CooperSurgical, and Karl Storz in the form of in-kind equipment was obtained through unrestricted educational grants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To establish validity evidence for the Essentials in Minimally Invasive Gynecology laparoscopic and hysteroscopic simulation systems.Methods: A prospective cohort study was IRB approved and conducted at 15 sites in the United States and Canada. The four participant cohorts based on training status were: 1) novice (postgraduate year [PGY]-1) residents, 2) mid-level (PGY-3) residents, 3) proficient (American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ABOG]-certified specialists without subspecialty training); and 4) expert (ABOG-certified obstetrician-gynecologists who had completed a 2-year fellowship in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery). Qualified participants were oriented to both systems, followed by testing with five laparoscopic exercises (L-1, sleeve-peg transfer; L-2, pattern cut; L-3, extracorporeal tie; L-4, intracorporeal tie; L-5, running suture) and two hysteroscopic exercises (H-1, targeting; H-2, polyp removal). Measured outcomes included accuracy and exercise times, including incompletion rates.Results: Of 227 participants, 77 were novice, 70 were mid-level, 33 were proficient, and 47 were experts. Exercise times, in seconds (±SD), for novice compared with mid-level participants for the seven exercises were as follows, and all were significant (P<.05): L-1, 256 (±59) vs 187 (±45); L-2, 274 (±38) vs 232 (±55); L-3, 344 (±101) vs 284 (±107); L-4, 481 (±126) vs 376 (±141); L-5, 494 (±106) vs 420 (±100); H-1, 176 (±56) vs 141 (±48); and H-2, 200 (±96) vs 150 (±37). Incompletion rates were highest in the novice cohort and lowest in the expert group. Exercise errors were significantly less and accuracy was greater in the expert group compared with all other groups.Conclusion: Validity evidence was established for the Essentials in Minimally Invasive Gynecology laparoscopic and hysteroscopic simulation systems by distinguishing PGY-1 from PGY-3 trainees and proficient from expert gynecologic surgeons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention launched the Bring Your Brave campaign to increase knowledge about early-onset breast cancer, defined as breast cancer in women aged 18-45 years. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists convened a panel of experts in breast disease from the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology to review relevant literature, validated tools, best practices, and practice guidelines as a first step toward developing educational materials for women's health care providers about early-onset breast cancer. Panel members conducted structured literature reviews, which were then reviewed by other panel members and discussed at an in-person meeting of stakeholder professional and patient advocacy organizations in April 2019. This article summarizes the relevant literature, existing guidance, and validated tools to guide health care providers in the prevention, early detection, and special considerations of early-onset breast cancer. Substantive knowledge gaps were noted and summarized to provide guidance for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and features of policies regulating abortion in U.S. teaching hospitals.Methods: In this mixed-methods study, we conducted a national survey of obstetrics and gynecology teaching hospitals (2015-2016) and qualitative interviews (2014 and 2017) with directors at obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. We asked participants about hospital regulations on abortion and their perceptions of the nature and enforcement of these policies. Interview analysis was conducted with a grounded theoretical approach and informed development of the survey. The prevalence of policies was described using survey data; differences in policy structures by region were analyzed using a series of logistic regression models.Results: Directors from 169 of 231 eligible training programs responded to the survey (73%). Institutional policies limited abortion beyond state law in 57% of teaching hospitals, most commonly in the Midwest and South (odds ratio [OR] 4.3, P<.01 for Midwest; OR 4.0, P=.001 for South vs Northeast). Policies varied in form (written and unwritten) and restricted abortion based on the indication for the procedure and gestational age. Nonmedically indicated, or "elective" procedures were more commonly restricted (48% of sites reporting any policy and 25% prohibiting these abortions altogether) than medically indicated ones (28% of sites reporting any policy.) Policies were created by those with institutional power, including hospital leadership and obstetrics and gynecology department chairs, and were perceived to be motivated by personal beliefs and a desire to avoid controversy. Rules were commonly enforced by medical specialists, hospital ethics committees, and department chairs. Qualitative data highlighted the convoluted nuances of these policies, which often put clinicians at odds with their professional mandates.Discussion: Reportedly driven by broader institutional interests, obstetrics and gynecology teaching hospital policies often restricted abortion beyond state law to the detriment of abortion access and training opportunities. Vague or unwritten abortion policies, although difficult to navigate, gave health care providers some agency and flexibility over their practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the rate of vaginal hysterectomy and outcomes after initiation of a prospective decision-tree algorithm to determine the optimal surgical route of hysterectomy.Methods: A prospective algorithm to determine optimal route of hysterectomy was developed, which uses the following factors: history of laparotomy, uterine size, and vaginal access. The algorithm was implemented at our institution from November 24, 2015, to December 31, 2017, for patients requiring hysterectomy for benign indications. Expected route of hysterectomy was assigned by the algorithm and was compared with the actual route performed to identify compliance compared with deviation. Surgical outcomes were analyzed.Results: Of 365 patients who met inclusion criteria, 202 (55.3%) were expected to have a total vaginal hysterectomy, 57 (15.6%) were expected to have an examination under anesthesia followed by total vaginal hysterectomy, 52 (14.2%) were expected to have an examination under anesthesia followed by robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy, and 54 (14.8%) were expected to have an abdominal or robotic-laparoscopic route of hysterectomy. Forty-six procedures (12.6%) deviated from the algorithm to a more invasive route (44 robotic, two abdominal). Seven patients had total vaginal hysterectomy when robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy or abdominal hysterectomy was expected by the algorithm. Overall, 71% of patients were expected to have a vaginal route of hysterectomy per the algorithm, of whom 81.5% had a total vaginal hysterectomy performed; more than 99% of the total vaginal hysterectomies attempted were successfully completed.Conclusion: Vaginal surgery is feasible, carries a low complication rate with excellent outcomes, and should have a place in gynecologic surgery. National use of this prospective algorithm may increase the rate of total vaginal hysterectomy and decrease health care costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The rapidly evolving genetic technologies that are available to patients and obstetrician-gynecologists have transformed the practice of clinical medicine. From cell-free DNA screening technologies in pregnancy to expanded carrier screening and hereditary cancer gene panels, obstetrician-gynecologists often are faced with questions about their legal responsibilities regarding genetic information as well as the legal ramifications of this information for their patients.The Committee on Genetics has constructed the following case studies to highlight some of the legal issues an obstetrician-gynecologist may encounter when performing genetic testing. These cases do not cover the breadth of legal issues affecting clinical genetics, but rather they illustrate certain legal concepts and principles as well as key pieces of legislation that are pertinent to clinical care. These case descriptions are not intended to serve as legal advice. Obstetrician-gynecologists are strongly encouraged to seek expert legal assistance to resolve questions involving legal rights or responsibilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]