Search

Although it is feasible today to perform laparoscopic surgical staging and treatment of ovarian low malignant potential tumors and early-stage ovarian cancer safely, it is still generally agreed that a patient with ovarian cancer should have a laparotomy. Concerns related to laparoscopy in managing gynecologic malignancy include the accuracy of intraoperative diagnosis, inadequate resection, significance of tumor spillage, improper or delay in surgical staging, delay in therapy, and the possibility of port-site metastasis. On the other hand, laparoscopy has the advantages of being a minimally invasive surgery, with shorter hospitalization, decreased postoperative pain, and quicker return to normal daily activities. We review the current literature discussing the consequences of laparoscopic surgery in ovarian tumors of low malignant potential and early-stage ovarian cancer.

Fetal infection by Parvovirus B 19 is a common cause of fetal anemia and nonimmune hydrops fetalis and may result in fetal death. Recent improvements in diagnosing parvovirus infections by sensitive molecular biology techniques now allow for a new insight into its pathogenic rule, immunology, and the varied clinical manifestations. The estimated overall risk of fetal loss after maternal exposure is about 6.5 percent, which is much less than previously thought. Inasmuch as complete spontaneous reversal of fetal hydrops has been commonly described, controversy exists regarding the management of the fetus with clinical signs of infection by Parvovirus B 19. According to the experience that has accumulated, it seems that only cases with severe fetal anemia or signs of fetal compromise should be managed by intrauterine transfusion. This procedure, however, is not without risk. Although an association between fetal viral infection and structural abnormalities has been described, it has not been proved yet. However, infection by Parvovirus B 19 has been recently proposed as a causative factor for congenital red blood cell aplasia.

A review is given of the various methods of assessing carbohydrate tolerance in pregnancy. Oral glucose tolerance screening and diagnostic tests have been in use for more than 25 years. They are easily administered, relatively inexpensive, and present reasonable sensitivity; therefore, they continue to be uses quite extensively. However, lack of reproducibility of the results and side effects such as nurses, vomiting, and headache have led to the use of alternate methods including glucose polymer (Polycose) and standard breakfast meals. These methods have been reported to present satisfactory results in clinical practice. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA10) and fructosamie assays are also alternate forms of testing carbohydrate metabolism HbA10measurement have been proven insensitive as a screening test for gestatioal diabetes, while their use as an index of overall glucose control remains valuable. The role of fructosamine in the assessment of carbohydrate intolerance remains controversial with conflicting claims made by various investigators regarding its sensitivity in detecting gestational diabetes and its response to alternations in glycemic control. In this review, the relative advantages ad disadvantages of each glucose tolerance test are discussed and recommendations are given regarding their utility in pregnancy.

Fetal infection by Parvovirus B 19 is a common cause of fetal anemia and nonimmune hydrops fetalis and may result in fetal death. Recent improvements in diagnosing parvovirus infections by sensitive molecular biology techniques not allow for a new insight into its pathogenic rule, immunology, and the varied clinical manifestations. The estimated overall risk of fetal loss after maternal exposure is about 6.5 percent, which is much less than previously thought. Inasmuch as complete spontaneous reversal of fetal hydrops has been commonly described, controversy exists regarding the management of the fetus with clinical signs of infection by Parvovirus B 19. According to the experience that has accumulated, it seems that only cases with severe fetal anemia or signs of fetal compromise should be managed by intrauterine transfusion. This procedure, however, is not without risk. Although an association between fetal viral infection and structural abnormalities has been described, it has not been proved yet. However, infection by Parvovirus B 19 has been recently proposed as a causative factor for congenital red blood cell aplasia.

This review provides recent data and clinical opinions on a new technology in assessing fetal well-being during labor, the fetal pulse oximeter. Fetal pulse oximetry is potentially superior to electronic fetal heart rate monitoring because it allows direct assessment of both fetal oxygen status and fetal tissue perfusion. Several studies during recent years have demonstrated that fetal pulse oximetry during labor is feasible and accurate. On the other hand, these very same studies have demonstrated a few potential disadvantages and limitations of fetal oximetry. The main limitation seems to be a wide range of normal values. The correlation of fetal oximetry during labor with perinatal outcome and long-term newborn outcome has not yet been determined. In summary, fetal pulse oximetry during labor merits further randomized prospective studies, especially with regard to improvement of perinatal outcome.