Search

Purpose: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is presently the most evidence-based, effective treatment of obesity. Nevertheless, only half of the eligible individuals who are referred for this procedure complete it. This study aims to investigate the association between social support and MBS completion, considering race and ethnicity. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 413 participants were enrolled between 2019 and 2022. Using the 19-item Brief Family Relationship Scale, which comprises three subscales (eight-item Cohesion subscale, four-item Expressiveness subscale, and seven-item Conflict subscale), the quality of family relationship functioning was assessed. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between MBS completion and social support status, adjusting for variables including race, ethnicity, age, gender, body mass index, and insurance. Results: The mean age of the sample was 47.55 years (SD 11.57), with 87% of the participants being female and 39% non-Hispanic White. Nearly 35% of participants (n = 145) completed MBS. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed overall cohesion (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.52 [95% CI, 1.15–2.00]; p =.003) and overall expressiveness (aOR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.22–2.05]; p <.001) were associated with higher odds of pursuing MBS. There was no significant interaction between overall cohesion, expressiveness, conflict, and race/ethnicity (p =.61, p =.63, p =.25, respectively). Conclusion: The findings indicated that there is a link between family-based social support and MBS completion, regardless of race and ethnicity. Future research should continue to explore the complex interplay between family dynamics and MBS outcomes, considering cultural variations to enhance the effectiveness of obesity interventions within diverse communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Less than 50% of eligible candidates who are referred complete Bariatric Metabolic Surgery (BMS). The factors influencing the decision to complete BMS, particularly how these factors vary across different racial and ethnic groups, remain largely unexplored. Methods: This prospective cohort study included adult patients referred to a bariatric surgeon or obesity medicine program between July 2019-September 2022. Sociodemographic characteristics, body mass index (BMI), anxiety, depression, body appreciation, and patient-physician relationship information were collected via survey and electronic health records. The association between BMS completion and potential decision-driving factors was examined using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis. Results: A total of 406 BMS -eligible patients participated in the study (mean [SD] age: 47.5 [11.6] years; 87.2% women; 18.0% Hispanic, 39% non-Hispanic Black [NHB], and 39% non-Hispanic White [NHW]; mean [SD] BMI: 45.9 [10.1] kg/m2). A total of 147 participants (36.2%) completed BMS. Overall, the most influential factor driving the decision to complete BMS was younger age (< 68.4 years), higher patient satisfaction, and BMI (≥ 38.0 kg/m2). Hispanic participants prioritized age (< 55.4 years), female sex, and body appreciation. For NHB participants, the highest ranked factors were age < 56.3 years, BMI ≥ 35.8 kg/m2, and higher patient satisfaction. For NHW patients, the most influential factors were age (39.1 to 68.6 years) and higher body appreciation. Conclusion: These findings highlight racial and ethnic group differences in the factors motivating individuals to complete BMS. By acknowledging these differences, healthcare providers can support patients from different backgrounds more effectively in their decision-making process regarding BMS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Obesity is a complex, chronic disease that is strongly associated with complications which cost the US healthcare system billions of dollars per year. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) has emerged as a safe and effective procedure for treatment of obesity, but without practice guidelines there are likely to be variations practice. We sought to describe current practice patterns amongst endoscopists who perform ESG to help define areas of focus for future research and guideline development. Methods: We conducted an anonymous cross-sectional survey to examine practice patterns related to ESG. The survey was organized in 5 sections: Endoscopic Practice, Training, and Resources; Pre-ESG Evaluation and Payment Model; Perioperative/Operative Period; Post-operative Period; and Endobariatric Practice Other Than ESG. Results: A variety of exclusion criteria were reported by physicians performing ESG. Most respondents (n = 21/32, 65.6%) would not perform ESG for BMI under 27, and 40.6% (n = 13/32) would not perform ESG on patients with BMI over 50. The majority of respondents (74.2%, n = 23/31) reported ESG was not covered in their region, and most reported patients covered residual costs (67.7%, n = 21/31). Conclusions: We found significant variability with respect to practice setting, exclusion criteria, pre-procedural evaluation, and medication use. Without guidelines for the selection of patients or standards for pre- and post-ESG care, substantial barriers to coverage will remain, and ESG will remain limited to those who can meet out-of-pocket costs. Larger studies are needed to confirm our findings, and future research should be focused on establishing patient selection criteria and standards in practices to provide guidance for endobariatric programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]