Search

Background: Studies investigating the underlying pathophysiology are needed to help explain and understand the postoperative complications following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. This study aimed to characterize segmental gastrointestinal pH profiles, motility measures, and transit times in patients with RYGB. Materials and Methods: Nineteen patients with RYGB underwent a standardized wireless motility capsule assessment. The oro-cecal segment was defined from capsule ingestion until the passage of the ileocecal junction. Segmental median pH, motility index, and transit time were determined for the oro-cecal and colonic segment as well as for the first and last hour of both these segments. For comparison to reference values, data from 17 healthy age- and gender-matched controls was used. A mixed effect model was used to describe differences between groups. Results: Median pH was high in patients with RYGB during the first hour of the oro-cecal segment (6.45 ± 0.4 vs 3.65 ± 1.55 pH units for healthy controls; P < 0.001), as well as during the entire oro-cecal segment (6.97 ± 0.4 vs 5.51 ± 1.1 pH units; P < 0.001). The same was evident for the median motility index (152 ± 64 vs 35.8 ± 31.1 mmHg*sec/min; P < 0.001 and 130 ± 65.9 vs 89.1 ± 20 mmHg*sec/min; P < 0.012, respectively). Median motility index was low the first hour of the colon (55.2 ± 45.7 vs 122 ± 77.9 mmHg*sec/min; P < 0.002). Additionally, patients had short oro-cecal transit time (5.8 ± 1.6 vs 7.6 ± 1.4 h; P < 0.001) and long colonic transit time (29.4 ± 17.5 vs 19.6 ± 12.2 h; P = 0.048). Conclusions: In patients with RYGB, the oro-cecal segment was characterized by an alkaline intraluminal environment, high motility activity, and short transit time. In contrast, colonic transit time was long. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Udgivelsesdato: 2009 BACKGROUND: Morbid obesity defined as BMI > 40 is a growing problem. It is primarily treated with diet, lifestyle changes, and medicine. However, at present, surgery remains the only effective option for the management. METHODS: Seventeen patients were studied 2 months after laparoscopic gastric banding. The aims were to evaluate the association between (1) the extent of pouch filling and satiety, (2) gastric emptying and weight loss, and (3) the pouch pressure during a meal and the sensation of satiety and weight loss. RESULTS: The preoperative weight was 146 kg (range 108-202 kg). The average weight loss was 21 kg between the banding and the examination. The half time (T (50%)) for the pouch emptying was 3 min (quartiles 3-12.5) and the time to 90% of pouch emptying (T (90%)) was 40 min (24.5-60). The sensation of satiety lasted 75 min (57.5-105), and the feeling of hunger started after 90 min (40-90). Neither T (50%) nor T (90%) correlated to the weight loss (R = 0.006, P > 0.5 and R = 0.1, P > 0.5). The sensation of satiety did not correlate to T (50%) or T (90%) (R = 0.6, P = 0.12 and R = 0.5, P = 0.15). No association was found between the sensory data and the pressure decline. Significant association was found between the load of the meal expressed as the area under the pouch pressure curve and the weight loss (R = 0.786, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: The satiety sensation lasted much longer than the pouch emptying and the pressure increase. The pressure load correlated to the weight loss. This indicates that neuroendocrine mechanisms caused by the accumulated mechanical load are most important for maintaining satiety.