Search

The aim of this paper is to reflect upon the management interventions of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and diuretic therapy that were implemented for a patient admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. Acute pulmonary oedema is a serious and life-threatening complication of acute heart failure, particularly if this results from an ischaemic event. Statistics highlight that of those patients treated for acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, approximately only one third were alive after 1 year. Many of these patients will require intensive care management in order to restore homeostasis. It is therefore imperative that nurses understand the condition and the relevant management of it in order to maximize the already poor prognosis. Using Driscoll's (2000) reflective model to guide critical thinking, this paper reflects on the management of one patient who was admitted to ICU with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema as a result of heart failure. Although there are many aspects of patient management that can be explored, specific care interventions that this patient received in relation to NIV and diuretic therapy will be considered. The evidence base for their use, together with the relevant nursing management issues, and patient implications will be critically analysed and outlined. This paper identifies that standard therapy for acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema is largely supportive and aimed at promoting gaseous exchange. It also highlights that nurses have a key role in ensuring that these essential treatments are as efficacious as possible. By using a reflective analysis approach, this paper highlights how reflecting on practice improves knowledge and understanding of the use of NIV and diuretic therapy interventions and should facilitate nurses working in ICU to become more competent in ensuring that the treatment provided for acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema is as successful as possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To discuss existing disparity of practice and clinical implications of measuring cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) from differing reference points thus highlighting the need for standardized benchmarks. Background: When managing traumatic brain injury (TBI), the arterial transducer level is a key to an accurate CPP reading; however, there is a lack of national standards about where to zero arterial transducers when monitoring CPP. Methods: A systematized search using the Cochrane library database, Pubmed database, Medline, British Library on line, CINAHL and PROQUEST using key search terms was used to identify articles that could form a basis for a discussion. Papers published between 2000 and 2008 were included. Papers that did not discuss arterial transducer level placement and CPP were excluded. The Brian Trauma Guidelines 2007 were scrutinized for recommendations. Results: Of 57 empirical studies accessed, none reported or explored the placement of the arterial transducer during CPP measurement. Conflicting opinions were identified within the literature and there were no recommendations made for practice within the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines 2007. Discussion: At the present time, there is insufficient evidence for recommending standard placement for mean arterial pressure (MAP) measurements for patients with TBI. There are implications to consider as the treatment prescribed will differ depending on where the arterial transducer is placed because the MAP and CPP displayed will fall by 15 mm Hg at a head elevation of 30 degrees. This poses a number of questions: is the CPP underestimated with the arterial transducer placed at head level? Is the CPP overestimated if the transducer is placed at mid axilla level? Recommendations: Further research is recommended. However, studies would be difficult to power as head-injured patients constitute a heterogeneous population. Professional consensus should be applied and standardized benchmarks agreed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and Objectives: To review the pathophysiology, accuracy, effectiveness and use of Licox for brain tissue oxygen monitoring in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Background: The Licox monitoring system allows continuous monitoring of partial pressure of brain tissue oxygen (PbO2), brain tissue temperature and intracranial pressure (ICP). The application and effectiveness of the use of Licox in TBI is not clearly explored within the literature. Inclusion Criteria: A date limit of 1995-2009, English language, all animal and human studies and the following terms were searched: Licox, brain tissue oxygenation, cerebral oxygenation and TBI. MEDLINE database was the primary data source. Exclusion Criteria: All paediatric papers were excluded from the search. Studies not related to pathophysiology and management of TBI and brain tissue oximetry in adults were excluded. Data relevant to the subject under consideration were extracted by three independent clinicians to form a narrative report. Studies were critically evaluated using the NHS Public Health Resource Unit's checklist for each study analysed. Conclusions: Licox offers new insights into cerebral pathology and physiology. The continuous bedside monitoring provides real-time data that can be used to improve patient management and prognosis in specialist units by trained and experienced staff. More research is required to understand the limitations of this technology and why it is not in widespread use. Relevence to Clinical Practice: A clinical tool that could be utilized more often in the right setting to improve care to patients suffering from TBI by disseminating more information on this unique tool. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]