1. Base-pairing preferences, physicochemical properties and mutational behaviour of the DNA lesion 8-nitroguanine†
- Author
-
Ian A. O'Neil, Richard Cosstick, Inder Bhamra, Patricia Compagnone-Post, Lesley A. Iwanejko, and Andrew D. Bates
- Subjects
Guanine ,Base pair ,Stereochemistry ,DNA damage ,Biology ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Genetics ,Base Pairing ,Polymerase ,chemistry.chemical_classification ,Guanosine ,Oligonucleotide ,RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase ,Hydrolysis ,Glycosidic bond ,DNA ,Templates, Genetic ,chemistry ,Biochemistry ,Oligodeoxyribonucleotides ,Mutagenesis ,Synthetic Biology and Chemistry ,Mutation ,biology.protein ,Primer (molecular biology) ,DNA Damage - Abstract
8-Nitro-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-nitrodG) is a relatively unstable, mutagenic lesion of DNA that is increasingly believed to be associated with tissue inflammation. Due to the lability of the glycosidic bond, 8-nitrodG cannot be incorporated into oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) by chemical DNA synthesis and thus very little is known about its physicochemical properties and base-pairing preferences. Here we describe the synthesis of 8-nitro-2′-O-methylguanosine, a ribonucleoside analogue of this lesion, which is sufficiently stable to be incorporated into ODNs. Physicochemical studies demonstrated that 8-nitro-2′-O-methylguanosine adopts a syn conformation about the glycosidic bond; thermal melting studies and molecular modelling suggest a relatively stable syn-8-nitroG·anti-G base pair. Interestingly, when this lesion analogue was placed in a primer-template system, extension of the primer by either avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (AMV-RT) or human DNA polymerase β (pol β), was significantly impaired, but where incorporation opposite 8-nitroguanine did occur, pol β showed a 2:1 preference to insert dA over dC, while AMV-RT incorporated predominantly dC. The fact that no 8-nitroG·G base pairing is seen in the primer extension products suggests that the polymerases may discriminate against this pairing system on the basis of its poor geometric match to a Watson–Crick pair.
- Published
- 2012