1. An Adolescent Substance Prevention Model Blocks the Effect ofCHRNA5Genotype on Smoking During High School
- Author
-
Gabriel L. Schlomer, Cleve Redmond, Mark E. Feinberg, Kerry L. Hair, Richard Spoth, Alisa E. Schink, Mark T. Greenberg, Jenae M. Neiderhiser, David J. Vandenbergh, and H. Harrington Cleveland
- Subjects
Male ,0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Pediatrics ,Adolescent ,Genotype ,Nerve Tissue Proteins ,Smoking Prevention ,Receptors, Nicotinic ,Disease cluster ,Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ,03 medical and health sciences ,Adolescent substance ,Risk Factors ,Internal medicine ,Intervention (counseling) ,medicine ,Humans ,Longitudinal Studies ,Genetic risk ,Students ,Original Investigation ,Schools ,biology ,business.industry ,Prevention model ,CHRNA5 ,Smoking ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Prevention intervention ,030104 developmental biology ,Adolescent Behavior ,biology.protein ,Female ,business - Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prevention intervention programs reduce substance use, including smoking, but not all individuals respond. We tested whether response to a substance use prevention/intervention program varies based upon a set of five markers (rs16969968, rs1948, rs578776, rs588765, and rs684513) within the cluster of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit genes (CHRNA5/A3/B4). METHODS Participants (N = 424) were randomly assigned to either control condition, or a family-based intervention in grade 6 and a school-based drug preventive intervention in grade 7. Smoking in the past month was assessed in grades 9-12 using a four-point scale (0 = never smoked, 1 = smoked but not in last month, 2 = one or a few times, 3 = about once a week or more). RESULTS There was a main effect of both the intervention (b = -0.24, P < .05) and genotype at rs16969968 (b = 0.14, P < .05) on high school smoking. Using dummy coding to allow for nonlinear effects, individuals with the A/A genotype smoked more often than those with G/G (b = 0.33, P < .05). A genotype × intervention effect was found with reduced smoking among those with A/A and G/A genotypes to levels similar to those with the G/G genotype (G/G vs. A/A: b = -0.67, P < .05; A/G vs. A/A: b = -0.61, P < .05; G/G vs. A/G ns). Results were nonsignificant for the other four markers. CONCLUSIONS Preventive interventions can reduce the genetic risk for smoking from rs16969968.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF