Search

Aims: Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) represents a complication after radical prostatectomy or benign prostatic obstruction surgery. The artificial urinary sphincter is considered the standard treatment but interest on minimally invasive devices, such as adjustable balloons, has recently increased. Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ProACT system., Methods: In this multicentric retrospective study, we reported the data from nine centers. Patients with SUI who underwent a ProACT device implantation for postoperative SUI and had a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included. Efficacy was evaluated at the maximum available follow-up and was assessed utilizing a 24-hour pad test. Patients were considered: "Dry" if presenting a urine leak weight lower than 8 g at the 24-hour pad test; "Improved" if presenting a reduction of urine leak higher than 50% (but >8 g/24 hours); "Failure" if presenting a reduction in urine leak lower than 50%. The evaluation included a record of intraoperative and long-term complications., Results: Safety and efficacy results are reported on 240 patients. 29.6% of patients were dry at 24 months, 37.5% were improved and 32.9% of patients were considered failures. The baseline mean pad weight of 367 g was reduced to 123 g at 24 months. Five-year follow-up on 152 patients showed similar efficacy. The complication rate was 22.5%, with the top complication being long-term balloon failure., Conclusions: ProACT implantation represents a safe and efficacious treatment for male postoperative SUI at both medium and long-term follow up. 67.1% of patients were dry or improved at 24 months. The majority of complications are low grade., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aims: To assess efficacy and safety as well as predictive factors of dry rate and freedom from surgical revision in patients underwent AUS placement. The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is still considered the standard for the treatment of moderate to severe post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, data reporting efficacy and safety from large series are lacking., Methods: A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted in 16 centers in Europe and USA. Only primary cases of AUS implantation in non-neurogenic SUI after prostate surgery, with a follow-up of at least 1 year were included. Efficacy data (continence rate, based on pad usage) and safety data (revision rate in case of infection and erosion, as well as atrophy or mechanical failure) were collected. Multivariable analyses were performed in order to investigate possible predictors of the aforementioned outcomes., Results: Eight hundred ninety-two men had primary AUS implantation. At 32 months mean follow-up overall dry rate and surgical revision were 58% and 30.7%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that patients without previous incontinence surgery had a higher probability to be dry after AUS implantation (OR: 0.51, P = 0.03). Moreover institutional case-load was positively associated with dry rate (OR: 1.18; P = 0.005) and freedom from revision (OR: 1.51; P = 0.00)., Conclusions: The results of this study showed that AUS is an effective option for the treatment of SUI after prostate surgery. Moreover previous incontinence surgery and low institutional case-load are negatively associated to efficacy and safety outcomes., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)